Tierarztl Prax Ausg K Kleintiere Heimtiere 2024; 52(01): 17-24
DOI: 10.1055/a-2229-3039
Originalartikel

Applicability, reproducibility, and reliability of the German version of the Glasgow composite measured pain scale – feline during implementation into a small animal clinic

Artikel in mehreren Sprachen: deutsch | English

Authors

  • Alexandra Schütter*

    1   Abteilung für Anästhesie und Analgesie, Klinik für Kleintiere, Stiftung Tierärztliche Hochschule Hannover
  • Ana Chorbadzhieva*

    1   Abteilung für Anästhesie und Analgesie, Klinik für Kleintiere, Stiftung Tierärztliche Hochschule Hannover
  • Sabine Kästner

    1   Abteilung für Anästhesie und Analgesie, Klinik für Kleintiere, Stiftung Tierärztliche Hochschule Hannover
Preview

Abstract

Objective The aim of the study was to evaluate reproducibility and practicality of the German version of the Glasgow composite measured pain scale – feline, during its implementation into a German veterinary hospital.

Material and methods The study comprised of 2 parts. Participation of veterinary professionals was voluntary. During part 1, 15 staff members (all rater=AR) with variable clinical experience (nurses, interns, junior clinician, senior clinicians), from 4 disciplines (anesthesia, internal medicine, surgery, neurology), and one main investigator (AC), pain scored 45 diseased cats and 10 healthy cats. Part 2 was an online survey, evaluating the practical experience of participants during part 1 and asking for suggestions to improve the scale and process of pain assessment. For part 1 normal distribution of data was tested by Shapiro-Wilk-Test and histograms. Intrarater and interrater reliability were evaluated by calculating the intraclass-correlation. Statistical analysis of part 2 used descriptive methods.

Results The interrater reliability was moderate (ICC AR : 0.59) and the intrarater reliability was good (ICC AC : 0.88). The pain scores of cats with medical (AR: 3.06±2.33, AC 3.52±2.34) and surgical disease (AR: 3.78±2.38, AC: 4.02±2.72) showed no significant difference. All healthy cats were classified as “not painful” (AR: 0.77±0.67, AC: 1.09±0.83). Clinical experience of the rater did not significantly influence pain scores. The GCMPS-F was judged as easy to use and as helpful tool for cats with unclear pain conditions.

Conclusion The GCMPS-F had a good acceptance and moderate interrater reliability.

Clinical Relevance Using the German version of the GCMPS-F, veterinary professionals from different disciplines and with different grades of specialisation can reliably assess pain levels in cats without prior extensive training.

Zusatzmaterial

Supplementary material



Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 29. Juni 2023

Angenommen: 13. November 2023

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
27. Februar 2024

© 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany