Standardized vs. Relative Intensity in CrossFit

Abstract

CrossFit is characterized by being a standardized training program that improves physical performance through the provision of several stimuli regardless of the participant’s strength level. This study aimed to compare the acute response in total repetitions as a measurement of performance, jump ability, physiological demand (heart rate and blood lactate), and perceived effort considering the participants’ strength level with individualized intensity in CrossFit. Thirty-five participants were assessed and asked to participate on two separate days in a standardized and relative ‘As Many Repetitions As Possible’ (AMRAP) CrossFit circuit. Both AMRAPs comprised strength, gymnastic and aerobic exercises, although only strength was individualized according to the participant’s level. Before the statistical analysis, participants were allocated to higher- or lower-strength groups following the one-repetition maximum-bodyweight ratio in the push press exercise. Results support the existence of a strong relationship between strength level and total repetitions in both AMRAPs. In addition, differences in total repetitions and rate of perceived exertion between strength groups are discarded when AMRAP intensity is individualized while physiological demand and jump ability are maintained. Thus, the higher-strength participants may benefit from similar responses with a lower number of repetitions. Therefore, CrossFit trainers should be encouraged to prescribe strength tasks based on the percentage of 1RM for every training.

Key words

high-intensity resistance training - acute response - resistance

Publication History

Received: 30 May 2023

Accepted: 24 October 2023

Article published online:
18 December 2023

• References

• 1 Shaw BS, Dullabh M, Forbes G. et al. Analysis of physiological determinants during a single bout of crossfit. Int J Perform Anal Sport 2015; 15: 809-815
• 2 Escobar KA, Morales J, Vandusseldorp TA. Metabolic profile of a crossfit training bout. J Human Sport Exerc 2017; 12: 1248-1255
• 3 Martínez-Gómez R, Valenzuela PL, Alejo LB. et al. Physiological predictors of competition performance in crossfit athletes. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2020; 17: 1-12
• 4 Weineck J. Entrenamiento total. Paidotribo;. 2005
• 5 Sánchez-Medina L, González-Badillo JJ. Velocity loss as an indicator of neuromuscular fatigue during resistance training. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2011; 43: 1725-1734
• 6 Kraemer WJ, Ratamess NA. Fundamentals of Resistance Training: Progression and Exercise Prescription. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2004; 36: 674-688
• 7 Jiménez-Reyes P, Samozino P, Brughelli M. et al. Effectiveness of an individualized training based on force-velocity profiling during jumping. Front Physiol 2017; 7: 677
• 8 Bellar D, Hatchett A, Judge LW. et al. Herthe relationship of aerobic capacity, anaerobic peak power and experience to performance in CrossFit exercise. Biol Sport 2015; 32: 315-320
• 9 Mangine GT, Tankersley JE, McDougle JM. et al. Predictors of CrossFit Open Performance. Sports (Basel) 2020; 8: 102
• 10 Suchomel TJ, Comfort P, Lake JP. Enhancing the force-velocity profile of athletes using weightlifting derivatives. Strength Cond J 2017; 39: 10-20
• 11 Hoffman JR, Ratamess NA, Klatt M. et al. Comparison between different off-season resistance training programs in Division III American college football players. J Strength Cond Res 2009; 23: 11-9
• 12 Hartmann H, Wirth K, Keiner M. et al. Short-term Periodization Models: Effects on Strength and Speed-strength Performance. Sports Med 2015; 45: 1373-1386
• 13 Häkkinen K, Komi PV, Alén M. et al. EMG, muscle fibre and force production characteristics during a 1-year training period in elite weight-lifters. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 1987; 56: 419-427
• 14 Prieske O, Chaabene H, Kullmann N. et al. Effects of Individualized Versus Traditional Power Training on Strength, Power, Jump Performances, and Body Composition in Young Male Nordic Athletes. Int J Sports Physiol Perform 2022; 17: 541-548
• 15 Claudino JG, Gabbett TJ, Bourgeois F. et al. CrossFit Overview: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Sports Med Open 2018; 4: 11
• 16 Weakley JJ, Till K, Darrall-Jones J. et al. The Influence of Resistance Training Experience on the Between-Day Reliability of Commonly Used Strength Measures in Male Youth Athletes. J Strength Cond Res 2017; 31: 2005-2010
• 17 Montalvo AM, Shaefer H, Rodriguez B. et al. Retrospective Injury Epidemiology and Risk Factors for Injury in CrossFit. J Sports Sci Med 2017; 16: 53-59
• 18 Ángel Rodríguez M, García-Calleja P, Terrados N. et al. Injury in CrossFit: A Systematic Review of Epidemiology and Risk Factors. Phys Sports Med 2022; 50: 3-10
• 19 Grier T, Canham-Chervak M, McNulty V. et al. Extreme Conditioning Programs and Injury Risk in a US Army Brigade Combat Team. US Army Med Dep J 2013; Oct–Dez: 36-47
• 20 Soriano MA, García-Ramos A, Torres-González A. et al. Comparison of 1-repetition-maximum performance across 3 weightlifting overhead pressing exercises and sport groups. Int J Sports Physiol Perform 2020; 15: 862-867
• 21 Haff G, Triplett NT. Essentials of strength training and conditioning. 4th edition. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics,; 2016
• 22 Buitrago M, Jianping M. Chinese Weightlifting Method: Technical mastery and training. Amherst, MA: Strength, LLC; 2018
• 23 Lake JP, Mundy PD, Comfort P. Power and impulse applied during push press exercise. J Strength Cond Res 2014; 28: 2552-2559
• 24 Smith MM, Sommer AJ, Starkoff BE. et al. Crossfit-based high-intensity power training improves maximal aerobic fitness and body composition. J Strength Cond Res 2013; 27: 3159-3172
• 25 Borg G. Psychophysical scaling with applications in physical work and the perception of exertion. Scand J Work Environ Health 1990; 16: 55-58
• 26 Foster C, Florhaug JA, Franklin J. et al. A New Approach to Monitoring Exercise Training.. 2001
• 27 Tanner RK, Fuller KL, Ross MLR. Evaluation of three portable blood lactate analysers: Lactate Pro, Lactate Scout and Lactate Plus. Eur J Appl Physiol 2010; 109: 551-559
• 28 Tanaka H, Monahan KD, Seals DR. Age-predicted maximal heart rate revisited. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001; 37: 153-156
• 29 Hopkins WG. A scale of magnitudes for effect statistics. A new view of statistics 2002; 502: 411
• 30 Hedges LV. Distribution Theory for Glass’s Estimator of Effect size and Related Estimators. J Educ Behav Stats 1981; 6: 107-128
• 31 Schwingshandl J, Sudi K, Eibl B. et al. Effect of an individualised training programme during weight reduction on body composition: A randomised trial. Arch Dis Child 1999; 81: 426-428
• 32 Coakley SL, Passfield L. Individualised training at different intensities, in untrained participants, results in similar physiological and performance benefits. J Sports Sci 2018; 36: 881-888
• 33 Zabaloy S, Pareja-Blanco F, Giráldez JC. et al. Effects of individualised training programmes based on the force-velocity imbalance on physical performance in rugby players. Isokinet Exerc Sci 2020; 28: 181-190
• 34 Oliver-Lopez A, Garcia-Valverde A, Sabido R. Summary of the evidence on responses and adaptations derived from CrossFit training. A systematic review. Retos 2022; 46: 309-332
• 35 Butcher SJ, Judd TB, Benko CR. et al. Relative Intensity of Two Types of Crossfit Exercise: Acute Circuit and High-Intensity Interval Exercise. Journal of Fitness Research 2015; 4: 3-15
• 36 Maté-Muñoz JL, Lougedo JH, Barba M. et al. Cardiometabolic and muscular fatigue responses to different crossfit workouts. J Sports Sci Med 2018; 17: 668-679
• 37 Tibana RA, de Sousa NMF, Cunha GV. et al. Validity of Session Rating Perceived Exertion Method for Quantifying Internal Training Load during High-Intensity Functional Training. Sports 2018; 6: 68
• 38 Drum SN, Bellovary BN, Jensen RL. et al. Perceived demands and postexercise physical dysfunction in CrossFit compared to an ACSM based training session. J Sports Med Phys Fitness 2016; 57: 604-609
• 39 Timón R, Olcina G, Camacho-Cardeñosa M. et al. 48-hour recovery of biochemical parameters and physical performance after two modalities of CrossFit workouts. Biol Sport 2019; 36: 283
• 40 Dias MR, Vieira JG, Pissolato JC. et al. TRAINING LOAD THROUGH HEART RATE AND PERCEIVED EXERTION DURING CROSSFIT. Revista Brasileira de Medicina do Esporte 2022; 28: 315-319
• 41 Maia NM, Kassiano W, Assumpção CO. et al. Neuromuscular and autonomic responses during a crossfit competition: A case study. Trends Sport Sci 2019; 26: 165-170
• 42 Prado Dantas T, Aidar FJ, de Matos Gama D. et al. Avaliação da força, potência e temperatura corporal em uma sessão de crossfit Assessment of body strength, power and temperature in a crossfit session. Edições Desafio Singular 2018; 14: 311-315
• 43 Serafini PR, Feito Y, Mangine GT. Self-reported Measures of Strength and Sport-Specific Skills Distinguish Ranking in an International Online Fitness Competition. J Strength Cond Res 2018; 32: 3474-3484
• 44 de Sousa Neto IV, de Sousa NMF, Neto FR. et al. Time Course of Recovery Following CrossFit Karen Benchmark Workout in Trained Men. Front Physiol 2022; 13: 1388
• 45 Jordan B. Vertical jump height as an indicator of lower-extremity muscular fatigue in recreational Crossfit athletes. Reno: University of Nevada,; 2019
• 46 Conde TF, De Souza Silva MR, Caobianco J. et al. Sensitivity of operational tests to training load in Crossfit. J Phys Educ Sport 2022; 22: 1493-1498
• 47 Tibana RA, de Almeida LM, Frade de Sousa NM. et al. Two Consecutive Days of Extreme Conditioning Program Training Affects Pro and Anti-inflammatory Cytokines and Osteoprotegerin without Impairments in Muscle Power. Front Physiol 2016; 7: 260
• 48 Fernández-Fernández J, Sabido Solana R, Moya D. et al. Acute physiological responses during crossfit workouts. Motricidad - Eur J Human Movement 2015; 35: 114-124
• 49 Perciavalle V, Marchetta NS, Giustiniani S. et al. Attentive processes, blood lactate and CrossFit. Phys Sportsmed 2016; 44: 403-406
• 50 Meier N, Sietmann D, Schmidt A. Comparison of Cardiovascular Parameters and Internal Training Load of Different 1-h Training Sessions in Non-elite CrossFit Athletes. J Sci Sport Exerc 2022; 5: 130-141