RSS-Feed abonnieren
PDF herunterladen
DOI: 10.1055/a-2199-2584
Combined Application of a Novel Robotic System and Exoscope for Microsurgical Anastomoses: Preclinical Performance
Funding This study received funding from Recovery Assistance for Cohesion and the Territories of Europe (REACT-EU) x EFRE-0802073.
Abstract
Background The concept of robotic microsurgery is becoming increasingly known as several robotic systems tailored to the specific needs of microsurgery are being introduced. Training with these devices is essential to draw conclusions about their potential clinical utility. This study describes the training and learning curve of experienced microsurgeons and complete novices using such a robotic surgical system in combination with an exoscope.
Methods Four experienced microsurgeons and three complete novices performed a total of 62 manual and robot-assisted anastomoses. The time for anastomosis completion and surgeon's satisfaction with the anastomosis and with the robotic system were recorded. The anastomoses' quality was assessed using the Structured Assessment of Microsurgery Skills (SAMS) and the Anastomosis Lapse Index (ALI). The Rapid Entire Body Assessment (REBA) was used for ergonomics evaluation.
Results All expert microsurgeons and novices improved their performance during training. The average anastomosis time decreased significantly, while satisfaction with the anastomosis and robotic system increased significantly over time. Multiple SAMS score parameters increased significantly throughout robotic but not manual training and the ALI score demonstrated more errors in the manual group. The REBA score displayed a significantly lower risk for musculoskeletal disorders in the robotic group.
Conclusion Currently, the first clinical applications of robotic surgical systems specifically designed for microsurgery are being reported. The introduction of such systems into clinical practice can be expected to have a steep learning curve, as demonstrated in our study. Meanwhile, robotic systems for microsurgical procedures may hold great potential for improvement of surgical quality and ergonomics.
Publikationsverlauf
Eingereicht: 26. März 2023
Angenommen: 31. Juli 2023
Accepted Manuscript online:
26. Oktober 2023
Artikel online veröffentlicht:
23. November 2023
© 2023. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA
-
References
- 1 Winocour S, Tarassoli S, Chu CK, Liu J, Clemens MW, Selber JC. Comparing outcomes of robotically assisted latissimus dorsi harvest to the traditional open approach in breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2020; 146 (06) 1221-1225
- 2 Selber JC. The robotic DIEP flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 2020; 145 (02) 340-343
- 3 Choi JH, Song SY, Park HS. et al. Robotic DIEP flap harvest through a totally extraperitoneal approach using a single-port surgical robotic system. Plast Reconstr Surg 2021; 148 (02) 304-307
- 4 Gundlapalli VS, Ogunleye AA, Scott K. et al. Robotic-assisted deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap abdominal harvest for breast reconstruction: a case report. Microsurgery 2018; 38 (06) 702-705
- 5 Toesca A, Peradze N, Galimberti V. et al. Robotic nipple-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction with implant: first report of surgical technique. Ann Surg 2017; 266 (02) e28-e30
- 6 Lai HW, Chen ST, Lin SL. et al. Robotic nipple-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction with gel implant: technique, preliminary results and patient-reported cosmetic outcome. Ann Surg Oncol 2019; 26 (01) 42-52
- 7 Sarfati B, Struk S, Leymarie N. et al. Robotic nipple-sparing mastectomy with immediate prosthetic breast reconstruction: surgical technique. Plast Reconstr Surg 2018; 142 (03) 624-627
- 8 Joo OY, Song SY, Park HS, Roh TS. Single-port robot-assisted prosthetic breast reconstruction with the da Vinci SP Surgical System: first clinical report. Arch Plast Surg 2021; 48 (02) 194-198
- 9 Kuo WL, Huang JJ, Huang YT. et al. Robot-assisted mastectomy followed by immediate autologous microsurgical free flap reconstruction: techniques and feasibility in three different breast cancer surgical scenarios. Clin Breast Cancer 2020; 20 (01) e1-e8
- 10 Huang JJ, Chuang EYH, Cheong DCF, Kim BS, Chang FCS, Kuo WL. Robotic-assisted nipple-sparing mastectomy followed by immediate microsurgical free flap reconstruction: Feasibility and aesthetic results - case series. Int J Surg 2021; 95: 106143
- 11 van Mulken TJM, Schols RM, Scharmga AMJ. et al. First-in-human robotic supermicrosurgery using a dedicated microsurgical robot for treating breast cancer-related lymphedema: a randomized pilot trial. Nat Commun 2020; 11 (01) 757
- 12 Lindenblatt N, Grünherz L, Wang A. et al. Early experience using a new robotic microsurgical system for lymphatic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2022; 10 (01) e4013
- 13 Aitzetmüller MM, Klietz M-L, Dermietzel AF, Hirsch T, Kückelhaus M. Robotic-assisted microsurgery and its future in plastic surgery. J Clin Med 2022; 11 (12) 3378
- 14 Will PA, Hirche C, Berner JE, Kneser U, Gazyakan E. Lymphovenous anastomoses with three-dimensional digital hybrid visualization: improving ergonomics for supermicrosurgery in lymphedema. Arch Plast Surg 2021; 48 (04) 427-432
- 15 van Mulken TJM, Boymans CAEM, Schols RM. et al. Preclinical experience using a new robotic system created for microsurgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 2018; 142 (05) 1367-1376
- 16 Chan W, Niranjan N, Ramakrishnan V. Structured assessment of microsurgery skills in the clinical setting. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2010; 63 (08) 1329-1334
- 17 Ghanem AM, Al Omran Y, Shatta B, Kim E, Myers S. Anastomosis Lapse Index (ALI): a validated end product assessment tool for simulation microsurgery training. J Reconstr Microsurg 2016; 32 (03) 233-241
- 18 Hignett S, McAtamney L. Rapid Entire Body Assessment (REBA). Appl Ergon 2000; 31 (02) 201-205
- 19 Dermietzel A, Aitzetmüller M, Klietz M-L. et al. Free flap breast reconstruction using a novel robotic microscope. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2022; 75 (07) 2387-2440
- 20 Ballestín A, Malzone G, Menichini G, Lucattelli E, Innocenti M. New robotic system with wristed microinstruments allows precise reconstructive microsurgery: preclinical study. Ann Surg Oncol 2022; 29 (12) 7859-7867
- 21 van Mulken TJM, Wolfs JAGN, Qiu SS. et al. One-year outcomes of the first human trial on robot-assisted lymphaticovenous anastomosis for breast cancer-related lymphedema. Plast Reconstr Surg 2022; 149 (01) 151-161
- 22 Barbon C, Grünherz L, Uyulmaz S, Giovanoli P, Lindenblatt N. Exploring the learning curve of a new robotic microsurgical system for microsurgery. JPRAS Open 2022; 34: 126-133
- 23 Innocenti M, Malzone G, Menichini G. First-in-human free flap tissue reconstruction using a dedicated microsurgical robotic platform. Plast Reconstr Surg 2023; 151 (05) 1078-1082