Inverse Schulterendoprothetik – aktueller Stand

Die inverse Schulterendoprothetik hat im Laufe der letzten Dekade einen immensen Zuwachs in der Behandlung verschiedener Schulterpathologien erfahren. Begründet wird dieser durch verlässliche Kurz- und vielversprechende Langzeitergebnisse sowie weiterentwickelte Endoprothesendesigns. Dieser Artikel gibt einen Überblick über die biomechanischen Eigenschaften, die aktuellen Indikationsfelder und klinischen Ergebnisse der inversen Schulterendoprothetik.

Abstract

Due to first promising long term outcome data, reverse shoulder arthroplasty experienced an immense increase of usage during the past decade. Moreover, the initial Grammont concept has constantly been refined and adapted to current scientific findings. Therefore, clinical and radiological problems like scapular notching and postoperative instability were constantly addressed but do still remain an area of concern.

This article summarises current concepts in reverse shoulder arthroplasty and gives an overview of actual indications like cuff tear arthropathy, severe osteoarthritis, proximal humerus fractures, tumours, fracture sequelae as well as revision surgery and their corresponding clinical and radiological results.

Schlüsselwörter

inverse Schulterendoprothese - Schulter - Arthrose - Defektarthropathie

Keywords

reverse shoulder arthroplasty - shoulder - arthritis - cuff tear arthropathy

• Literatur

• 1 Chalmers PN, Salazar DH, Romeo AA. et al. Comparative utilization of reverse and anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty: a comprehensive analysis of a high-volume center. J Am Acad Orthop Sur 2018; 26: e504-e510
• 2 Jang YH, Lee JH, Kim SH. Effect of scapular notching on clinical outcomes after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. Bone Joint J 2020; 102-B: 1438-1445
• 3 Melis B, DeFranco M, Lädermann A. et al. An evaluation of the radiological changes around the Grammont reverse geometry shoulder arthroplasty after eight to 12 years. Bone Joint J Br 2011; 93: 1240-1246
• 4 Chae J, Siljander M, Wiater JM. Instability in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2018; 26: 587-596
• 5 Zmistowski B, Gutman M, Horvath Y. et al. Acromial stress fracture following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: incidence and predictors. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2020; 29: 799-806
• 6 Boileau P, Moineau G, Roussanne Y. et al. Bony increased offset-reversed shoulder arthroplasty (BIO-RSA). JBJS Essent Surg Tech 2017; 7: e37
• 7 Imiolczyk JP, Audigé L, Harzbecker V. et al. Metallic humeral and glenoid lateralized implants in reverse shoulder arthroplasty for cuff tear arthropathy and primary osteoarthritis. JSES Int 2022; 6: 221-228
• 8 Werthel JD, Walch G, Vegehan E. et al. Lateralization in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a descriptive analysis of different implants in current practice. Int Orthop 2019; 43: 2349-2360
• 9 Lädermann A, Tay E, Collin P. et al. Effect of critical shoulder angle, glenoid lateralization, and humeral inclination on range of movement in reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Bone Joint Res 2019; 8: 378-386
• 10 Kennon JC, Songy C, Bartels D. et al. Primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty: how did medialized and glenoid-based lateralized style prostheses compare at 10 years?. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2020; 29(Suppl. 7S): S23-S31
• 11 Denard PJ, Lederman E, Parsons BO. et al. Finite element analysis of glenoid-sided lateralization in reverse shoulder arthroplasty. J Orthopaed Res 2017; 35: 1548-1555
• 12 Duethman NC, Aibinder WR, Nguyen NTV. et al. The influence of glenoid component position on scapular notching: a detailed radiographic analysis at midterm follow-up. JSES Int 2020; 4: 144-150
• 13 Haidamous G, Lädermann A, Hartzler RU. et al. Radiographic parameters associated with excellent versus poor range of motion outcomes following reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Shoulder Elb 2022; 14: 39-47
• 14 Matsuki K, King JJ, Wright TW. et al. Outcomes of reverse shoulder arthroplasty in small- and large-stature patients. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2018; 27: 808-815
• 15 Lädermann A, Denard PJ, Boileau P. et al. Effect of humeral stem design on humeral position and range of motion in reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Int Orthop 2015; 39: 2205-2213
• 16 Holschen M, Kiriazis A, Bockmann B. et al. Treating cuff tear arthropathy by reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: do the inclination of the humeral component and the lateral offset of the glenosphere influence the clinical and the radiological outcome?. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 2022; 32: 307-315
• 17 Freislederer F, Toft F, Audigé L. et al. Lateralized vs. classic Grammont-style reverse shoulder arthroplasty for cuff deficiency Hamada stage 1–3: does the design make a difference?. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2022; 31: 341-351
• 18 Boileau P, Chuinard C, Roussanne Y. et al. Modified latissimus dorsi and teres major transfer through a single delto-pectoral approach for external rotation deficit of the shoulder: as an isolated procedure or with a reverse arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2007; 16: 671-682
• 19 Hamada K, Fukuda H, Mikasa M. et al. Roentgenographic findings in massive rotator cuff tears. A long-term observation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1990; (254) 92-96
• 20 Favard L, Lautmann S, Sirveaux F, Oudet D, Kerjean Y, Huquet D. Hemiarthroplasty versus reverse arthroplasty in the treatment of osteoarthritis with massive rotator cuff tear. In: Walch G, Boileau P, Molé D. 2000 Shoulder Prostheses two to ten Years Follow-up. Montpellier: Sauramps Medical; 2001: 261-268
• 21 Cuff DJ, Pupello DR, Santoni BG. et al. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of rotator cuff deficiency. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2017; 99: 1895-1899
• 22 Gerber C, Canonica S, Catanzaro S. et al. Longitudinal observational study of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for irreparable rotator cuff dysfunction: results after 15 years. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2018; 27: 831-838
• 23 Bacle G, Nové-Josserand L, Garaud P. et al. Long-term outcomes of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2017; 99: 454-461
• 24 Lädermann A, Denard PJ, Collin P. et al. Effect of humeral stem and glenosphere designs on range of motion and muscle length in reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Int Orthop 2020; 44: 519-530
• 25 Boileau P, Rumian AP, Zumstein MA. Reversed shoulder arthroplasty with modified L’Episcopo for combined loss of active elevation and external rotation. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2010; 19: 20-30
• 26 Boileau P, Chuinard C, Roussanne Y. et al. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty combined with a modified latissimus dorsi and teres major tendon transfer for shoulder pseudoparalysis associated with dropping arm. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2008; 466: 584-593
• 27 Valenti P, Zanjani LO, Schoch BS. et al. Mid- to long-term outcomes after reverse shoulder arthroplasty with latissimus dorsi and teres major transfer for irreparable posterosuperior rotator cuff tears. Int Orthop 2021; 45: 1263-1271
• 28 Flury M, Kwisda S, Kolling C. et al. Latissimus dorsi muscle transfer reduces external rotation deficit at the cost of internal rotation in reverse shoulder arthroplasty patients: a cohort study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2019; 28: 56-64
• 29 Young BL, Connor PM, Schiffern SC. et al. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty with and without latissimus and teres major transfer for patients with combined loss of elevation and external rotation: a prospective, randomized investigation. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2020; 29: 874-881
• 30 Roux A, Decroocq L, Batti SE. et al. Epidemiology of proximal humerus fractures managed in a trauma center. Orthop Traumatology Surg Res 2012; 98: 715-719
• 31 Lill H, Scheibel M, Vogt C. Die proximale Humerusfraktur. Berlin: Springer; 2014
• 32 Peters PM, Plachel F, Danzinger V. et al. Clinical and radiographic outcomes after surgical treatment of proximal humeral fractures with head-split component. J Bone Joint Surg 2019; 102: 68-75
• 33 Imiolczyk JP, Brunner U, Imiolczyk T. et al. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humerus head-split fractures—a retrospective cohort study. J Clin Med 2022; 11: 2835
• 34 Spross C, Meester J, Mazzucchelli RA. et al. Evidence-based algorithm to treat patients with proximal humerus fractures—a prospective study with early clinical and overall performance results. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2019; 28: 1022-1032
• 35 Spross C, Zdravkovic V, Manser M. et al. Outcomes of management of proximal humeral fractures with patient-specific, evidence-based treatment algorithms. J Bone Joint Surg 2021; 103: 1906-1916
• 36 Gallinet D, Cazeneuve J-F, Boyer E. et al. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for recent proximal humerus fractures: outcomes in 422 cases. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2019; 105: 805-811
• 37 Decrooq L, Sirveaux F, Clavert P. Long-term results of RSA for acute fractures. In: Boileau P, Walch G, Molé D, Favard L, Lévigne C, Sirveaux F. Shoulder Concepts: Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty. Montpellier: Sauramps Medical; 2016: 107-108
• 38 Luciani P, Farinelli L, Procaccini R. et al. Primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty for acute proximal humerus fractures: a 5-year long term retrospective study of elderly patients. Injury 2019; 50: 1974-1977
• 39 Sirveaux F, Roche O, Molé D. Shoulder arthroplasty for acute proximal humerus fracture. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2010; 96: 683-694
• 40 Plausinis D, Kwon YW, Zuckerman JD. Complications of humeral head replacement for proximal humeral fractures. Curr Orthopaed 2005; 2: 236-239
• 41 Jain NP, Mannan SS, Dharmarajan R. et al. Tuberosity healing after reverse shoulder arthroplasty for complex proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients—does it improve outcomes? A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2019; 28: e78-e91
• 42 Walch G, Badet R, Boulahia A. et al. Morphologic study of the glenoid in primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis. J Arthroplasty 1999; 14: 756-760
• 43 Bercik MJ, Kruse K, Yalizis M. et al. A modification to the Walch classification of the glenoid in primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis using three-dimensional imaging. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2016; 25: 1601-1606
• 44 Leschinger T, Raiss P, Loew M. et al. Predictors of medium-term clinical outcomes after total shoulder arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Traum Su 2017; 137: 187-193
• 45 Raiss P, Schmitt M, Bruckner T. et al. Results of cemented total shoulder replacement with a minimum follow-up of ten years. J Bone Joint Surg 2012; 94: e171
• 46 Collin P, Hervé A, Walch G. et al. Mid-term results of reverse shoulder arthroplasty for glenohumeral osteoarthritis with posterior glenoid deficiency and humeral subluxation. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2019; 28: 2023-2030
• 47 Nabergoj M, Neyton L, Bothorel H. et al. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty with bony and metallic versus standard bony reconstruction for severe glenoid bone loss. A retrospective comparative cohort study. J Clin Med 2021; 10: 5274
• 48 Boileau P, Morin-Salvo N, Bessière C. et al. Bony increased-offset–reverse shoulder arthroplasty: 5 to 10 years’ follow-up. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2020; 29: 2111-2122
• 49 Seeto B, Clowez G, Neyton L, Trojani C, Boileau P. Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty for Fracture Sequelae: a Minimum 5 Year Follow-up. In: Boileau P, Walch G, Molé D, Favard L, Lévigne C, Sirveaux F. Shoulder Concepts: reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty. Montpellier: Sauramps Medical; 2016: S109-S120
• 50 Boileau P, Trojani C, Chuinard C. et al. Proximal humerus fracture sequelae. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006; 442: 121-130
• 51 Bassens D, Decock T, Van Tongel A. et al. Long-term results of the Delta Xtend reverse shoulder prosthesis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2019; 28: 1091-1097
• 52 Chua N, Onggo JR, Nambiar M. et al. Functional outcomes of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in boileau class 1 and class 2 proximal humeral fracture sequelae: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Shoulder Elb 2023; 15 (Suppl. 3) S43-S53
• 53 Holschen M, Pallmann J, Schorn D. et al. Simultaneous removal of a locking plate and implantation of a reversed shoulder prosthesis in elderly patients suffering from fracture sequelae of the proximal humerus. Musculoskelet Surg 2020; 104: 295-301
• 54 Schliemann B, Theisen C, Kösters C. et al. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for type I fracture sequelae after internal fixation of proximal humerus fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2017; 137: 1677-1683
• 55 Raiss P, Edwards TB, Collin P. et al. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for malunions of the proximal part of the humerus (type-4 fracture sequelae). J Bone Joint Surg 2016; 98: 893-899
• 56 Grosel TW, Plummer DR, Everhart JS. et al. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty provides stability and better function than hemiarthroplasty following resection of proximal humerus tumors. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2019; 28: 2147-2152
• 57 De Wilde L, Boileau P, Van derBracht H. Does reverse shoulder arthroplasty for tumors of the proximal humerus reduce impairment?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2011; 469: 2489-2495
• 58 Sirveaux F, Jullion S, Raynier JL. Reverse Prothesis for proximal humeral Tumor. In: Boileau P, Walch G, Molé D, Favard L, Lévigne C, Sirveaux F. Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty for non-operated, irreparable massive Cuff Tear (Hamada I‑II-III) minimum 5‑Year Follow-up. Montpellier: Sauramps Medical; 2016: 133-140
• 59 Ameziane Y, Meyer L, Holschen M. et al. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty after failed anatomic shoulder arthroplasty. Does the design of the original implant affect the long-term outcome?. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2022; 31: e132
• 60 Holschen M, Meyer L, Ameziane Y. et al. Conversions from anatomic shoulder replacements to reverse shoulder arthroplasty: do the indications for initial surgery influence the outcome?. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2022; 31: e132-e133
• 61 Iannotti J, Baker J, Rodriguez E. et al. Three-dimensional preoperative planning software and a novel information transfer technology improve glenoid component positioning. J Bone Joint Surg 2014; 96: e71
• 62 Berhouet J, Gulotta LV, Dines DM. et al. Preoperative planning for accurate glenoid component positioning in reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2017; 103: 407-413
• 63 Eraly K, Stoffelen D, Sloten JV. et al. A patient-specific guide for optimizing custom-made glenoid implantation in cases of severe glenoid defects: an in vitro study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2016; 25: 837-845
• 64 Throckmorton TW, Gulotta LV, Bonnarens FO. et al. Patient-specific targeting guides compared with traditional instrumentation for glenoid component placement in shoulder arthroplasty: a multi-surgeon study in 70 arthritic cadaver specimens. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2015; 24: 965-971
• 65 Elsheikh AA, Galhoum MS, Mokhtar MA. et al. Patient-specific instrumentation versus standard surgical instruments in primary reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a retrospective comparative clinical study. J Shoulder Elbow Arthroplast 2022; 6
• 66 Hwang S, Werner BC, Provencher M. et al. Short term functional outcomes of reverse shoulder arthroplasty following three-dimensional planning is similar whether placed with a standard guide or patient specific instrumentation (PSI). J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2023; 32: 1654-1661
• 67 Kirsch JM, Puzzitiello RN, Swanson D. et al. Outcomes after anatomic and reverse shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of glenohumeral osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg 2022; 104: 1362-1369
• 68 Shah SS, Gaal BT, Roche AM. et al. The modern reverse shoulder arthroplasty and an updated systematic review for each complication: part I. JSES Int 2020; 4: 929-943
• 69 Shah SS, Roche AM, Sullivan SW. et al. The modern reverse shoulder arthroplasty and an updated systematic review for each complication: part II. JSES Int 2020; 5: 121-137
• 70 Liu EY, Kord D, Yee NJ. et al. Stemless reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review of short- and mid-term results. Shoulder Elbow 2021; 13: 482-491
• 71 Beck S, Patsalis T, Busch A. et al. Long-term results of the reverse Total Evolutive Shoulder System (TESS). Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2019; 139: 1039-1044
• 72 Erickson BJ, Denard PJ, Griffin JW. et al. A 135° short inlay humeral stem leads to comparable radiographic and clinical outcomes compared with a standard-length stem for reverse shoulder arthroplasty. JSES Int 2022; 6: 802-808
• 73 Schoch C, Plath JE, Ambros L. et al. Clinical and radiological outcomes of a stemless reverse shoulder implant: a two-year follow-up in 56 patients. JSES Int 2021; 5: 1042-1048
• 74 Moroder P, Ernstbrunner L, Zweiger C. et al. Short to mid-term results of stemless reverse shoulder arthroplasty in a selected patient population compared to a matched control group with stem. Int Orthop 2016; 40: 2115-2120
• 75 Schlueter-Brust K, Henckel J, Katinakis F. et al. Augmented-reality-assisted k-wire placement for glenoid component positioning in reversed shoulder arthroplasty: a proof-of-concept study. J Pers Med 2021; 11: 777
• 76 Kriechling P, Roner S, Liebmann F. et al. Augmented reality for base plate component placement in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a feasibility study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2021; 141: 1447-1453
• 77 Moroder P, Akgün D, Plachel F. et al. The influence of posture and scapulothoracic orientation on the choice of humeral component retrotorsion in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2020; 29: 1992-2001
• 78 Moroder P, Urvoy M, Raiss P. et al. Patient posture affects simulated ROM in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a modeling study using preoperative planning software. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2022; 480: 619-631