Early versus late endoscopic treatment of pancreatic necrotic collections: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract

Background and study aims Recently studies have compared early (<4 weeks) vs. late or standard (>4 weeks) endoscopic treatment of pancreatic necrotic collections (PNC) and have reported favorable results for early treatment. In this meta-analysis, we compared the efficacy and safety of early vs. late endoscopic treatment of PNC.

Patients and methods We reviewed several databases from inception to September 30, 2021 to identify studies that compared early with late endoscopic treatment of PNC. Our outcomes of interest were adverse events (AEs), resolution of PNC, performance of direct endoscopic necrosectomy, need for further interventions, and mean number of endoscopic necrosectomy sessions. We calculated pooled risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for categorical variables and mean differences (MDs) with 95% CIs for continuous variables. Data were analyzed by random effect model. Heterogeneity was assessed by I₂ statistic.

Results We included four studies with 427 patients. We found no significant difference in rates of AEs, RR (95% CI) 1.70 (range, 0.56–5.20), resolution of necrotic or fluid collections, RR (95% CI) 0.89 (range, 0.71–1.11), need for further interventions, RR (95% CI) 1.47 (range, 0.70–3.08), direct necrosectomy, RR (95% CI) 1.39 (range, 0.22–8.80), mortality, RR (95% CI) 2.37 (range, 0.26–21.72) and mean number of endoscopic necrosectomy sessions, MD (95% CI) 1.58 (range,–0.20–3.36) between groups.

Conclusions Early endoscopic treatment of PNC can be considered for indications such as infected necrosis or sterile necrosis with symptoms or complications; however, future large multicenter studies are required to further evaluate its safety.

Keywords

Endoscopic ultrasonography - Pancreas - Intervention EUS

Publication History

Received: 28 February 2022

Accepted after revision: 17 May 2023

Accepted Manuscript online:
25 May 2023

Article published online:
04 September 2023

• References

• 1 Trikudanathan G, Wolbrink DRJ, van Santvoort HC. et al. Current concepts in severe acute and necrotizing pancreatitis: an evidence-based approach. Gastroenterology 2019; 156: 1994-2007 e3 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.01.269. (PMID: 30776347)
• 2 Baron TH, DiMaio CJ, Wang AY. et al. American Gastroenterological Association Clinical Practice Update: Management of Pancreatic Necrosis. Gastroenterology 2020; 158: 67-75 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.07.064. (PMID: 31479658)
• 3 Isayama H, Nakai Y, Rerknimitr R. et al. Asian consensus statements on endoscopic management of walled-off necrosis Part 1: Epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2016; 31: 1546-1554 DOI: 10.1111/jgh.13394. (PMID: 27044023)
• 4 Baron TH. Drainage for infected pancreatic necrosis - Is the waiting the hardest part?. N Engl J Med 2021; 385: 1433-1435 DOI: 10.1056/NEJMe2110313. (PMID: 34614334)
• 5 Arvanitakis M, Dumonceau JM, Albert J. et al. Endoscopic management of acute necrotizing pancreatitis: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) evidence-based multidisciplinary guidelines. Endoscopy 2018; 50: 524-546 DOI: 10.1055/a-0588-5365. (PMID: 29631305)
• 6 Sugimoto M, Sonntag DP, Flint GS. et al. Better outcomes if percutaneous drainage is used early and proactively in the course of necrotizing pancreatitis. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2016; 27: 418-425 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2015.11.054. (PMID: 26806694)
• 7 Singh AK, Samanta J, Gulati A. et al. Outcome of percutaneous drainage in patients with pancreatic necrosis having organ failure. HPB (Oxford) 2021; 23: 1030-1038
• 8 Chantarojanasiri T, Yamamoto N, Nakai Y. et al. Comparison of early and delayed EUS-guided drainage of pancreatic fluid collection. Endosc Int Open 2018; 6: 1398-1405 DOI: 10.1055/a-0751-2698. (PMID: 30505932)
• 9 Oblizajek N, Takahashi N, Agayeva S. et al. Outcomes of early endoscopic intervention for pancreatic necrotic collections: a matched case-control study. Gastrointest Endosc 2020; 91: 1303-1309 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.01.017. (PMID: 31958461)
• 10 Sharaiha RZ, Saumoy M, Andalib I. et al. Complete pancreatic walled off necrosis resolution; optimal time of drainage, is four weeks that important?. Gastrointest Endosc 2017; 85: 240
• 11 Rana SS, Sharma R, Kishore K. et al. Safety and efficacy of early (<4 weeks of illness) endoscopic transmural drainage of post-acute pancreatic necrosis predominantly located in the body of the pancreas. J Gastrointest Surg 2021; 25: 2328-2335 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-021-04945-y. (PMID: 33547585)
• 12 Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM. et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 2021; 372: n71 DOI: 10.1136/bmj.n71. (PMID: 33782057)
• 13 Slim K, Nini E, Forestier D. et al. Methodological index for non-randomized studies (minors): development and validation of a new instrument. ANZ J Surg 2003; 73: 712-716 DOI: 10.1046/j.1445-2197.2003.02748.x. (PMID: 12956787)
• 14 Boxhoorn L, van Dijk SM, van Grinsven J. et al. Immediate versus postponed intervention for infected necrotizing pancreatitis. N Engl J Med 2021; 385: 1372-1381 DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2100826. (PMID: 34614330)
• 15 Trikudanathan G, Tawfik P, Amateau SK. et al. Early (<4 weeks) versus standard (≥ 4 weeks) endoscopically centered step-up interventions for necrotizing pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol 2018; 113: 1550-1558 DOI: 10.1038/s41395-018-0232-3. (PMID: 30279466)
• 16 Bakker OJ, van Santvoort HC, van Brunschot S. et al. Endoscopic transgastric vs surgical necrosectomy for infected necrotizing pancreatitis: a randomized trial. JAMA 2012; 307: 1053-1061 DOI: 10.1001/jama.2012.276. (PMID: 22416101)
• 17 van Brunschot S, van Grinsven J, van Santvoort HC. et al. Endoscopic or surgical step-up approach for infected necrotising pancreatitis: a multicentre randomised trial. Lancet 2018; 391: 51-58 DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32404-2. (PMID: 29108721)