CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Endosc Int Open 2023; 11(03): E276-E283
DOI: 10.1055/a-2039-3936
Original article

Comparison of the hybrid and partial stent-in-stent method for endoscopic three-segment drainage for unresectable malignant hilar biliary obstruction

1   National Cancer Center Hospital, Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology, Tokyo, Japan
2   Kumamoto University, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Faculty of Life Sciences, Kumamoto, Japan
,
1   National Cancer Center Hospital, Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology, Tokyo, Japan
,
Yoshikuni Nagashio
1   National Cancer Center Hospital, Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology, Tokyo, Japan
,
Yuta Maruki
1   National Cancer Center Hospital, Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology, Tokyo, Japan
,
Akihiro Ohba
1   National Cancer Center Hospital, Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology, Tokyo, Japan
,
Yuki Kawasaki
1   National Cancer Center Hospital, Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology, Tokyo, Japan
,
Kotaro Takeshita
1   National Cancer Center Hospital, Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology, Tokyo, Japan
,
Chigusa Morizane
1   National Cancer Center Hospital, Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology, Tokyo, Japan
,
Yasuhito Tanaka
2   Kumamoto University, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Faculty of Life Sciences, Kumamoto, Japan
,
Takuji Okusaka
1   National Cancer Center Hospital, Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology, Tokyo, Japan
› Author Affiliations
Supported by: National Cancer Center Research and Development Fund 2022-A-16

Abstract

Background and study aims The clinical outcome of the new hybrid drainage method for unresectable malignant hilar biliary obstruction (UMHBO) has not yet been compared with that of the partial stent-in-stent (PSIS) method with three or more stents.

Patients and methods Patients with UMHBO underwent drainage of three segments using the hybrid or PSIS method. The clinical outcomes of both methods were compared retrospectively.

Results Overall, 54 patients underwent the hybrid (n = 31) or PSIS (n = 23) method of drainage with three or more stents for UMHBO. There were no significant differences in the technical success rate (hybrid vs. PSIS, 87.1 % vs. 87 %), clinical success rate according to per-protocol analysis (81.5 % vs. 70 %), early adverse events rate (14.8 % vs. 10%), late adverse events rate (7.4 % vs. 0 %), and technical success rate of the endoscopic transpapillary reintervention (90.9 % vs. 100 %). Time to recurrent biliary obstruction (TRBO) of the hybrid and PSIS methods was 178 and 231 days, respectively, with no significant difference (P = 0.354).

Conclusions The choice between the two methods should be made at the physician’s discretion.

Supplementary material



Publication History

Received: 13 July 2022

Accepted after revision: 16 January 2023

Accepted Manuscript online:
21 February 2023

Article published online:
23 March 2023

© 2023. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 
  • References

  • 1 Dumonceau JM, Tringali A, Papanikolaou IS. et al. Endoscopic biliary stenting: indications, choice of stents, and results: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Clinical Guideline – Updated October 2017. Endoscopy 2018; 50: 910-930
  • 2 Perdue DG, Freeman ML, DiSario JA. et al. Plastic versus self-expanding metallic stents for malignant hilar biliary obstruction: a prospective multicenter observational cohort study. J Clin Gastroenterol 2008; 42: 1040-1046
  • 3 Mukai T, Yasuda I, Nakashima M. et al. Metallic stents are more efficacious than plastic stents in unresectable malignant hilar biliary strictures: a randomized controlled trial. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 2013; 20: 214-222
  • 4 Sangchan A, Kongkasame W, Pugkhem A. et al. Efficacy of metal and plastic stents in unresectable complex hilar cholangiocarcinoma: a randomized controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 76: 93-99
  • 5 Dumas R, Demuth N, Buckley M. et al. Endoscopic bilateral metal stent placement for malignant hilar stenoses: identification of optimal technique. Gastrointest Endosc 2000; 51: 334-338
  • 6 Lee JH, Kang DH, Kim JY. et al. Endoscopic bilateral metal stent placement for advanced hilar cholangiocarcinoma: a pilot study of a newly designed Y stent. Gastrointest Endosc 2007; 66: 364-369
  • 7 Park DH, Lee SS, Moon JH. et al. Newly designed stent for endoscopic bilateral stent-in-stent placement of metallic stents in patients with malignant hilar biliary strictures: multicenter prospective feasibility study (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 69: 1357-1360
  • 8 Kogure H, Isayama H, Nakai Y. et al. High single-session success rate of endoscopic bilateral stent-in-stent placement with modified large cell Niti-S stents for malignant hilar biliary obstruction. Dig Endosc 2014; 26: 93-99
  • 9 Kogure H, Isayama H, Nakai Y. et al. Newly designed large cell Niti-S stent for malignant hilar biliary obstruction: a pilot study. Surg Endosc 2011; 25: 463-467
  • 10 Lee TH, Moon JH, Kim JH. et al. Primary and revision efficacy of cross-wired metallic stents for endoscopic bilateral stent-in-stent placement in malignant hilar biliary strictures. Endoscopy 2013; 45: 106-113
  • 11 Chennat J, Waxman I. Initial performance profile of a new 6F self-expanding metal stent for palliation of malignant hilar biliary obstruction. Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 72: 632-636
  • 12 Lee TH, Park DH, Lee SS. et al. Technical feasibility and revision efficacy of the sequential deployment of endoscopic bilateral side-by-side metal stents for malignant hilar biliary strictures: a multicenter prospective study. Dig Dis Sci 2013; 58: 547-555
  • 13 Lee TH, Moon JH, Park SH. Biliary stenting for hilar malignant biliary obstruction. Dig Endosc 2020; 32: 275-286
  • 14 Moon JH, Rerknimitr R, Kogure H. et al. Topic controversies in the endoscopic management of malignant hilar strictures using metal stent: side-by-side versus stent-in-stent techniques. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 2015; 22: 650-656
  • 15 Naitoh I, Hayashi K, Nakazawa T. et al. Side-by-side versus stent-in-stent deployment in bilateral endoscopic metal stenting for malignant hilar biliary obstruction. Dig Dis Sci 2012; 57: 3279-3285
  • 16 Law R, Baron TH. Bilateral metal stents for hilar biliary obstruction using a 6Fr delivery system: outcomes following bilateral and side-by-side stent deployment. Dig Dis Sci 2013; 58: 2667-2672
  • 17 Lee TH, Moon JH, Choi JH. et al. Prospective comparison of endoscopic bilateral stent-in-stent versus stent-by-stent deployment for inoperable advanced malignant hilar biliary stricture. Gastrointest Endosc 2019; 90: 222-230
  • 18 Ishigaki K, Hamada T, Nakai Y. et al. Retrospective comparative study of side-by-side and stent-in-stent metal stent placement for hilar malignant biliary obstruction. Dig Dis Sci 2020; 65: 3710-3718
  • 19 Uchida D, Kato H, Muro S. et al. Efficacy of endoscopic over 3-branched partial stent-in-stent drainage using self-expandable metallic stents in patients with unresectable hilar biliary carcinoma. J Clin Gastroenterol 2015; 49: 529-536
  • 20 Kawamoto H, Tsutsumi K, Fujii M. et al. Endoscopic 3-branched partial stent-in-stent deployment of metallic stents in high-grade malignant hilar biliary stricture (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc 2007; 66: 1030-1037
  • 21 Kawamoto H, Tsutsumi K, Harada R. et al. Endoscopic deployment of multiple JOSTENT SelfX is effective and safe in treatment of malignant hilar biliary strictures. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2008; 6: 401-408
  • 22 Koshitani T, Nakagawa S, Itoh Y. Multiple self-expandable metal stent deployment for unresectable malignant hilar biliary strictures: Combination of side-by-side and stent-in-stent methods. Dig Endosc 2016; 28: 621
  • 23 Koshitani T, Nakagawa S, Konaka Y. et al. Endoscopic deployment of multiple (≥ 3) metal stents for unresectable malignant hilar biliary strictures. Endosc Int Open 2019; 7: E672-E677
  • 24 Inoue T, Ibusuki M, Kitano R. et al. Combined side-by-side and stent-in-stent method for triple metal stenting in patients with malignant hilar biliary obstruction. Dig Endosc 2019; 31: 698-705
  • 25 Maruki Y, Hijioka S, Wu SYS. et al. Novel endoscopic technique for trisegment drainage in patients with unresectable hilar malignant biliary strictures (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2020; 92: 763-769
  • 26 Ogura T, Yamada M, Ueno S. et al. Hybrid placement technique for hepatic hilar obstruction using a new uncovered self-expandable metal stent. Endosc Int Open 2019; 7: E1288-E1292
  • 27 Isayama H, Hamada T, Yasuda I. et al. TOKYO criteria 2014 for transpapillary biliary stenting. Dig Endosc 2015; 27: 259-264
  • 28 Lee TH, Moon JH, Choi HJ. et al. Third metal stent for revision of malignant hilar biliary strictures. Endoscopy 2016; 48: 1129-1133