Download PDF
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Endosc Int Open 2023; 11(01): E105-E106
DOI: 10.1055/a-2007-1644
Editorial

Could the sessile serrated lesion detection rate become an ESGE quality parameter?

Cesare Hassan
1   Humanitas University, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Pieve Emanuele, Italy
2   Humanitas Clinical and Research Center –IRCCS-, Endoscopy Unit, Rozzano, Italy
,
Alessandro Repici
1   Humanitas University, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Pieve Emanuele, Italy
2   Humanitas Clinical and Research Center –IRCCS-, Endoscopy Unit, Rozzano, Italy
,
Tommy Rizkala
1   Humanitas University, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Pieve Emanuele, Italy
,
Michal F. Kaminski
3   Department of Gastroenterological Oncology, The Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, and Medical Center for Postgraduate Education, Warsaw, Poland
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
Also available at
   Permissions and Reprints

Incorporation of quality assurance within organized population-based screening programs resulted in a profound decrease in colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence and mortality in European countries. In particular, three colonoscopy quality indicators have been consistently scrutinized in such programs, namely cecal intubation rate, rate of adequate bowel preparation, and the adenoma detection rate (ADR) [1].



Publication History

Article published online:
26 January 2023

© 2023. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

Refers to:

Sessile serrated lesion detection rates continue to increase: 2008–2020Endosc Int Open 2023; 11(01): E107-E116
DOI: 10.1055/a-1990-0509

 

  • References

  • 1 Rex DK, Schoenfeld PS, Cohen J. et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 81: 31-53
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Spada C, Koulaouzidis A, Hassan C. et al. Colonoscopy quality across Europe: a report of the European Colonoscopy Quality Investigation (ECQI) Group. Endosc Int Open 2021; 9: E1456-E1462
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 van Toledo DEFWM, IJspeert JEG, Bossuyt PMM. et al. Serrated polyp detection and risk of interval post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer: a population-based study. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2022; 7: 747-754
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Crockett SD, Nagtegaal ID. Terminology, molecular features, epidemiology, and management of serrated colorectal neoplasia. Gastroenterology 2019; 157: 949-966.e4
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Ohki D, Tsuji Y, Shinozaki T. et al. Sessile serrated adenoma detection rate is correlated with adenoma detection rate. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2018; 10: 82-90
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar