20-year Results of a 3D Titanium Mesh Coating Stability of 31 Artificial Cups

Abstract

Background The aim of this work was to demonstrate the bony bond strength and resilience of a three-dimensional titanium mesh coating of an artificial acetabulum produced using the diffusion bonding technique. Under the extreme conditions ranging from abrasion-related osteolysis to acetabular perforation, the degree of residual bone and the integrity of the coating were determined. The remaining zones of the (still) stable bone connection are inevitably exposed to a greater load of the layer adhesion between the titanium mesh and the core shell. The investigation was intended to provide information about the stages of damage according to Paprosky in which it was still justifiable to leave the implant in place and simply change the inlay from the purely material-technical point of view of a stable coating. The bond between bone and implant was examined with regard to a possible retention of the implant for its adaptive remodeling up to 27 years.

Materials and Methods In a retrospective study, 31 explanted human acetabular cups of the Harris-Galante II type, with an average lifetime of 19.7 years (11–27 years), were examined by means of digital area measurement to determine both the bone areas remaining on the coating and the damaged areas of the titanium mesh. Periacetabular bone loss was recorded in a modified Paprosky (PAP) damage classification. Full hemispherical sections of 4 acetabular cups with a life time of 16, 20, 22 and 27 years were examined histopathologically using the diamond cut technique.

Results The periacetabular bone loss resulted in damage class PAP I in 8 cases, PAP IIa in 7 cases, PAP IIb in 2 cases, PAP IIc in 9 cases, PAP IIIa in 3 cases and PAP IIIa in 2 cases PAP IIIb. The average amount of bone that was still firmly attached to the coating after explantation was 17% (0–70%) of the total cup surface. Paprosky I accounted for 44.1%, and PAP IIa and IIb stadiums together a total of 17.1%. The average bone fraction of the implants no longer anchored in the host bed at stages IIc, IIIa and IIIb was 2%. The average coating damage was 11% (0–100%) and was exclusively attributable to the unstable implants of stages IIc, IIIa and IIIb. The histopathological findings showed adaptive bone remodeling, that was detectable for up to 27 years through the titanium mesh down to the interface with the solid acetabular core. The titanium wire mesh was mostly surrounded by lamellar, mature bone.

Conclusion The results show that the connection between the Tivanium cup and the previously oldest and unchanged sintered coating – in the form of a three-dimensional titanium mesh applied in point and line contact – is very load-resistant even under the extreme loads of periacetabular osteolysis and cup perforations. Since there was no damage to the coating in periacetabular damage stages Paprosky I, IIa and IIb, it is justifiable in these damage stages to leave the implant in situ and to continue to use it with sole replacement of the inlay, but leaving the socket shell. The third-generation acetabular cup (Trilogy) with unchanged three-dimensional titanium mesh coating has been implanted in over 1.2 million cases for 26 years. After a long service life, an increasing number of wear and tear conditions can be expected in today’s mostly elderly and vulnerable patient clientele. In view of the results presented here, the early detection of damage would make it possible to avoid costly and stressful explantation of the entire acetabular cup in favor of replacing the sole inlay in Paprosky stages I, IIa and IIb.

Keywords

titanium fibermesh coating - layer adhesion - artificial hip socket

Publication History

Received: 13 July 2022

Accepted after revision: 21 December 2022

Article published online:
12 April 2023

• Literatur

• 1 Harvey EJ, Bobyn JD, Tanzer M. et al. Effect of flexibility of the femoral stem on bone-remodeling and fixation of the stem in a canine total hip arthroplasty model without cement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1999; 81: 93-107 DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.81b1.9111. (PMID: 10068012)
• 2 Sumner DR, Galante JO. Determinants of stress shielding: design versus materials versus interface. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1992; (274) 202-212 DOI: 10.1097/00003086-199201000-00020. (PMID: 1729005)
• 3 Behrens BA, Helms G, Pösse O. et al. FE-Simulation zur Lokalisierung hoch beanspruchter Bereiche in der Hüftpfanne von Endoprothesen. Biomed Tech (Berl) 2006; 51: 367-370 DOI: 10.1515/BMT.2006.071. (PMID: 17155874)
• 4 Galante J, Rostoker W, Lueck R. et al. Sintered fiber metal composites as a basis for attachment of implants to bone. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1971; 53: 101-114 DOI: 10.2106/00004623-197153010-00009. (PMID: 5540151)
• 5 Ryan G, Pandit A, Apatsidis DP. Fabrication methods of porous metals for use in orthopaedic applications. Biomaterials 2006; 27: 2651-2670 DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.12.002. (PMID: 16423390)
• 6 Long M, Rack HJ. Titanium alloys in total joint replacement – a materials science perspective. Biomaterials 1998; 19: 1621-1639 DOI: 10.1016/s0142-9612(97)00146-4. (PMID: 9839998)
• 7 Gonzalez JEG, Mirza-Rosca JC. Study of the corrosion behavior of titanium and some of its alloys for biomedical and dental implant applications. J Electroanal Chem 1999; 471: 109-115
• 8 Peters J, Hemptenmacher J, Kumpfert J, Leyens C. Titan und Titanlegierungen: Struktur, Gefüge, Eigenschaften. Deutsche Forschungsanstalt für Luft- und Raumfahrt, Köln. In: Peters M, Leyens C, Kumpfert J. Titan und seine Legierungen. Oberursel: DGM-Verlag; 1996
• 9 Peters M, Leyens C. Titan und Titanlegierungen. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH; 2002
• 10 Panigrahi BB, Godkhindi MM, Das K. et al. Sintering kinetics of micrometric titanium powder. Mater Sci Engin A 2005; 396: 255-262 DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2005.01.016.
• 11 Kitaoka K, Yamamoto H, Tani T. et al. Mechanical strength and bone bonding of a titanium fiber mesh block for intervertebral fusion. J Orthop Sci 1997; 2: 106-113 DOI: 10.1007/BF02489521.
• 12 Niles JL, Coletti jr JM, Wilson C. Biomedical Evaluation of Bone-Porous Material Interfaces. J Biomed Mater Res 1973; 7: 231-251 DOI: 10.1002/jbm.820070211. (PMID: 4703760)
• 13 Sheth NP, Nelson CL, Springer BD. et al. Acetabular bone loss in revision total hip arthroplasty: evaluation and management. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2013; 21: 128-139 DOI: 10.5435/JAAOS-21-03-128. (PMID: 23457063)
• 14 Donath K. Die Trenn-Dünnschliff-Technik zur Herstellung histologischer Präparate von nicht schneidbaren Geweben und Materialien. Präparator 1988; 34: 197-206
• 15 Hahn M, Vogel M, Delling G. Undecalcified preparation of bone tissue: report of technical experience and development of new methods. Virchows Arch A Pathol Anat Histopathol 1991; 418: 1-7 DOI: 10.1007/BF01600238. (PMID: 1899163)
• 16 Young GH, Abdel MP, Amendola RL. et al. Cementing Constrained Liners Into Secure Cementless Shells: A Minimum 15-Year Follow-Up-Study. J Arthroplasty 2017; 32: 3480-3483 DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.07.014. (PMID: 28780226)
• 17 Haft GF, Heiner AL, Dorr LD. et al. A biomechanical analysis of polyethylene liner cementation into a fixed metal acetabular shell. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003; 85: 1100-1110 DOI: 10.2106/00004623-200306000-00019. (PMID: 12784010)
• 18 Haidukewych GJ. Osteolysis in the well-fixed socket: cup retention or revision?. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2012; 94(11 Suppl. A): S65-S69 DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.94B11.30616. (PMID: 23118385)
• 19 Petis SM, Kubista B, Hartzler RU. et al. Polyethylene liner and femoral head exchange in total hip arthroplasty. Factors associated with success and failure. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2019; 101: 421-428 DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.18.00522. (PMID: 30845036)
• 20 Clohisy JC, Harris WH. The Harris-Galante porous-coated acetabular component with screw fixation. An average ten-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1999; 81: 66-73 DOI: 10.2106/00004623-199901000-0001. (PMID: 9973056)
• 21 Callaghan JJ, Savory CG, O’Rourke MR. et al. Are all cementless acetabular components created equal?. J Arthroplasty 2004; 19 (Suppl. 01) S95-S98 DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2004.02.017. (PMID: 15190560)
• 22 Della Valle CJ, Berger RA, Shott S. et al. Primary total hip arthroplasty with a porous-coated acetabular component. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004; 86: 1217-1222 DOI: 10.2106/00004623-200406000-00014. (PMID: 15173295)
• 23 Lachiewicz PF, Soileau ES. Second-generation modular acetabular components provide fixation at 10 to 16 years. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2012; 470: 366-372 DOI: 10.1007/s11999-011-1950-7. (PMID: 21691908)
• 24 Urban RM, Hall DJ, Della Valle C. et al. Successful long-term fixation and progression of osteolysis associated with first-generation cementless acetabular components retrieved post mortem. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2012; 94: 1877-1885 DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.J.01507. (PMID: 23079880)
• 25 Matsushita I, Morita Y, Ito Y. et al. Long-term clinical and radiographic results of cementless total hip arthroplasty for patients with rheumatoid arthritis: minimal 10-year follow-up. Mod Rheumatol 2014; 24: 281-284 DOI: 10.3109/14397595.2013.843758. (PMID: 24252044)
• 26 Petersen MB, Poulsen IH, Thomsen J. et al. The hemispherical Harris-Galante acetabular cup, inserted without cement. The results of an eight to eleven-year follow-up of one hundred and sixty-eight hips. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1999; 81: 219-224 DOI: 10.2106/00004623-199902000-00009. (PMID: 10073585)
• 27 Valle AG, Zoppi A, Peterson MG. et al. Clinical and radiographic results associated with a modern, cementless modular cup design in total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004; 86: 1998-2004 DOI: 10.2106/00004623-200409000-00019. (PMID: 15342763)
• 28 Curry HG, Lynskey TG, Frampton CM. Harris-Galante II acetabular cup: a survival analysis. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 2008; 16: 201-205 DOI: 10.1177/230949900801600215. (PMID: 18725673)
• 29 Klika AK, Murray TG, Darwiche H. et al. Options for acetabular fixation surfaces. J Long Term Eff Med Implants 2007; 17: 187-192 DOI: 10.1615/jlongtermeffmedimplants.v17.i3.20. (PMID: 19023943)
• 30 Mayman DJ, González Della Valle A, Lambert E. et al. Late fiber metal shedding of the first and second-generation Harris Galante acetabular component. A report of 5 cases. Arthroplasty 2007; 22: 624-629 DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2006.05.027. (PMID: 17562426)
• 31 Pidhorz LE, Urban RM, Jacobs JJ. et al. A quantitative study of bone and soft tissues in cementless porous-coated acetabular components retrieved at autopsy. J Arthroplasty 1993; 8: 213-225 DOI: 10.1016/s0883-5403(09)80015-6. (PMID: 8478636)