CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Endosc Int Open 2023; 11(02): E187-E192
DOI: 10.1055/a-1978-6842
Original article

Prospective study on the efficacy of endoscopic through-the-scope tack and suture system for gastric peroral endoscopic myotomy mucosal incision site closure

Hafiz M. Khan
1   Center for Interventional Endoscopy, AdventHealth, Orlando, Florida, United States
,
Tony S. Brar
1   Center for Interventional Endoscopy, AdventHealth, Orlando, Florida, United States
,
Muhammad K. Hasan
1   Center for Interventional Endoscopy, AdventHealth, Orlando, Florida, United States
,
Kambiz Kadkhodayan
1   Center for Interventional Endoscopy, AdventHealth, Orlando, Florida, United States
,
Mustafa A. Arain
1   Center for Interventional Endoscopy, AdventHealth, Orlando, Florida, United States
,
Maham Hayat
1   Center for Interventional Endoscopy, AdventHealth, Orlando, Florida, United States
,
Aimen Farooq
2   Department of Medicine, AdventHealth, Orlando, Florida, United States
,
Gurdeep Singh
2   Department of Medicine, AdventHealth, Orlando, Florida, United States
,
Dennis Yang
1   Center for Interventional Endoscopy, AdventHealth, Orlando, Florida, United States
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Background and study aims Mucosal closure after gastric per-oral endoscopic myotomy (G-POEM) can be difficult due to the thick gastric mucosa. We evaluated the use of a novel through-the-scope (TTS) suture system for G-POEM mucosotomy closure.

Patients and methods This was a single-center prospective study on consecutive patients who underwent G-POEM with TTS suture closure between February 2022 and August 2022. Technical success was defined as complete mucosotomy closure with TTS suture alone. On subgroup analysis, we compared performance on TTS suturing between the advanced endoscopist and the advanced endoscopy fellow (AEF) under supervision.

Results Thirty-six consecutive patients (median age 60 years, interquartile range [IQR] 48.5–67], 72 % women) underwent G-POEM with TTS suture of the mucosotomy. Median mucosal incision length was 2 cm (IQR: 2–2.5). Mean mucosal closure and total procedure time were 17.5 ± 10.8 and 48.4 ± 16.8 minutes, respectively. Technical success was achieved in 24 patients (66.7 %) and 100 % of the cases were adequately closed with a combination of TTS suture and clips. When compared to the advanced endoscopist, the AEF required > 1 TTS suture system for complete closure significantly more frequently (66.7 % vs. 8.3 %, P = 0.009) and more time for mucosal closure (20.4 ± 12.1 vs. 11.9 ± 4.9 minutes, P = 0.03).

Conclusions TTS suturing is effective and safe for G-POEM mucosal incision closure. With experience, technical success is high, and most closures may be achieved using a single TTS suture system alone, which has important cost and time implications. Additional comparative trials with other closure devices are need1ed.



Publication History

Received: 31 August 2022

Accepted after revision: 11 November 2022

Accepted Manuscript online:
14 November 2022

Article published online:
23 February 2023

© 2022. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 
  • References

  • 1 Lacy BE, Tack J, Gyawali CP. AGA clinical practice update on management of medically refractory gastroparesis: expert review. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2022; 20: 491-500
  • 2 Ashat M, El-Abiad R, Khashab MA. Gastric peroral endoscopic myotomy for gastroparesis: making sense of the pros. Gastrointest Endosc 2022; 96: 509-511
  • 3 Parsa N, Friedel D, Stavropoulos SN. POEM, GPOEM, and ZPOEM. Dig Dis Sci 2022; 67: 1500-1520
  • 4 Mahmoud T, Wong Kee Song LM, Stavropoulos SN. et al. Initial multicenter experience using a novel endoscopic tack and suture system for challenging GI defect closure and stent fixation (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2022; 95: 373-382
  • 5 Zhang LY, Bejjani M, Ghandour B. et al. Endoscopic through-the-scope suturing. VideoGIE 2021; 7: 46-51
  • 6 Chung H, Khashab MA. Gastric peroral endoscopic myotomy. Clin Endosc 2018; 51: 28-32
  • 7 Khashab MA, Ngamruengphong S, Carr-Locke D. et al. Gastric per-oral endoscopic myotomy for refractory gastroparesis: results from the first multicenter study on endoscopic pyloromyotomy (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2017; 85: 123-128
  • 8 Nass KJ, Zwager LW, van der Vlugt M. et al. Novel classification for adverse events in GI endoscopy: the AGREE classification. Gastrointest Endosc 2022; 95: 1078-1085
  • 9 Gregor L, Wo J, DeWitt J. et al. Gastric peroral endoscopic myotomy for the treatment of refractory gastroparesis: a prospective single-center experience with mid-term follow-up (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2021; 94: 35-44
  • 10 Hill C, El Zein M, Agnihotri A. et al. Endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty: the learning curve. Endosc Int Open 2017; 5: 900-904
  • 11 Hustak R, Vackova Z, Krajciova J. et al. Endoscopic clips versus overstitch suturing system device for mucosotomy closure after peroral endoscopic pyloromyotomy (G-POEM): a prospective single-center study. Surg Endosc 2022; 36: 9254-9261
  • 12 Zhang LY, Bejjani M, Ghandour B. et al. Through-the-scope suture closure of peroral endoscopic myotomy mucosal incision sites. Endoscopy 2022; DOI: 10.1055/a-1890-4917.