Joint and Functional Examinations in the Orthopaedic and Traumatological Video Consultation – What is Currently Possible?

Abstract

Background In the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, video consultations have gained importance in orthopaedic and traumatological departments. In current literature, different adaptations of classic joint and functional examinations have been described for the virtual examination.

Methodology A systematic review of current literature on adaptations for the virtual joint and functional examination in orthopaedics and trauma surgery was performed over PubMed (January 2010 to April 2021). The identified examination methods were then summarised systematically according to body region and pathology. Each examination was then described in detail and depicted in an exemplary picture.

Results In total 17 articles were identified and included in the analysis. Most of the examinations employed classical examination methods which were adapted so that they could be performed by the patient independently. Everyday items were described as supporting tools. In five publications, orthopaedic examinations performed in video consultations were compared to the classical examination. Results of functional examinations showed less agreement with results of classical orthopaedic examinations when compared to inspection and ROM-testing.

Conclusion Current literature offers a substantial repertoire of examination options that can be used in the orthopaedic and traumatological video consultation. The reported examinations are mostly oriented to classical orthopaedic examinations. In future digital examinations have to be validated and possibly further adapted in future.

Keywords

digitalisation - functional examination - orthopedics - trauma surgery - online video consultation

Publication History

Received: 13 December 2021

Accepted after revision: 26 September 2022

Article published online:
06 December 2022

• Literatur

• 1 Doraiswamy S, Abraham A, Mamtani R. et al. Use of Telehealth During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Scoping Review. J Med Internet Res 2020; 22: e24087 DOI: 10.2196/24087. (PMID: 33147166)
• 2 Hincapié MA, Gallego JC, Gempeler A. et al. Implementation and Usefulness of Telemedicine During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Scoping Review. J Prim Care Community Health 2020; 11: 215013272098061 DOI: 10.1177/2150132720980612. (PMID: 33300414)
• 3 Albrecht M, Otten M, Sander M. IGES Institut. PraxisBarometer Digitalisierung 2021. Kurzbericht der Ergebnisse für die Kassenärztliche Bundesvereinigung. Berlin, Januar 2022. Accessed October 13, 2022 at: https://www.kbv.de/media/sp/IGES_PraxisBaroDigit2021_Kurzbericht.pdf
• 4 Iyengar K, Mabrouk A, Jain VK. et al. Learning opportunities from COVID-19 and future effects on health care system. Diabetes Metab Syndr Clin Res Rev 2020; 14: 943-946 DOI: 10.1016/j.dsx.2020.06.036.
• 5 Knörr V, Dini L, Gunkel S. et al. Use of telemedicine in the outpatient sector during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional survey of German physicians. BMC Prim Care 2022; 23: 92 DOI: 10.1186/s12875-022-01699-7. (PMID: 35461212)
• 6 Jiménez-Rodríguez D, Santillán García A, Montoro Robles J. et al. Increase in Video Consultations During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Healthcare Professionals’ Perceptions about Their Implementation and Adequate Management. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2020; 17: 5112 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17145112. (PMID: 32679848)
• 7 Craig J, Petterson V. Introduction to the Practice of Telemedicine. J Telemed Telecare 2005; 11: 3-9 DOI: 10.1177/1357633X0501100102.
• 8 Sood S, Mbarika V, Jugoo S. et al. What Is Telemedicine? A Collection of 104 Peer-Reviewed Perspectives and Theoretical Underpinnings. Telemed E-Health 2007; 13: 573-590 DOI: 10.1089/tmj.2006.0073. (PMID: 17999619)
• 9 Bundestag. Gesetz für eine bessere Versorgung durch Digitalisierung und Innovation (Digitale-Versorgung-Gesetz – DVG) vom 09.12.2019. Accessed October 13, 2022 at: https://dejure.org/BGBl/2019/BGBl._I_S._2562
• 10 Lamminen H, Nevalainen J, Alho A. et al. Experimental telemedicine in orthopaedics. J Telemed Telecare 1996; 2: 170-173 DOI: 10.1258/1357633961930013. (PMID: 9375053)
• 11 Atanda A, Pelton M, Fabricant PD. et al. Telemedicine utilisation in a paediatric sports medicine practice: decreased cost and wait times with increased satisfaction. J ISAKOS Jt Disord Orthop Sports Med 2018; 3: 94-97 DOI: 10.1136/jisakos-2017-000176.
• 12 Buvik A, Bergmo TS, Bugge E. et al. Cost-Effectiveness of Telemedicine in Remote Orthopedic Consultations: Randomized Controlled Trial. J Med Internet Res 2019; 21: e11330 DOI: 10.2196/11330. (PMID: 30777845)
• 13 Abel KC, Baldwin K, Chuo J. et al. Can Telemedicine Be Used for Adolescent Postoperative Knee Arthroscopy Follow-up?. JBJS J Orthop Physician Assist 2017; 5: e26 DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.JOPA.17.00014.
• 14 Buvik A, Bugge E, Knutsen G. et al. Quality of care for remote orthopaedic consultations using telemedicine: a randomised controlled trial. BMC Health Serv Res 2016; 16: 483 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-016-1717-7. (PMID: 27608768)
• 15 Buvik A, Bugge E, Knutsen G. et al. Patient reported outcomes with remote orthopaedic consultations by telemedicine: A randomised controlled trial. J Telemed Telecare 2019; 25: 451-459 DOI: 10.1177/1357633X18783921. (PMID: 29973130)
• 16 Good DW, Lui DF, Leonard M. et al. Skype: a tool for functional assessment in orthopaedic research. J Telemed Telecare 2012; 18: 94-98 DOI: 10.1258/jtt.2011.110814. (PMID: 22247538)
• 17 Haider Z, Aweid B, Subramanian P. et al. Telemedicine in orthopaedics and its potential applications during COVID-19 and beyond: A systematic review. J Telemed Telecare 2020; 1357633X: 2093824 DOI: 10.1177/1357633X20938241.
• 18 Kane LT, Thakar O, Jamgochian G. et al. The role of telehealth as a platform for postoperative visits following rotator cuff repair: a prospective, randomized controlled trial. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2020; 29: 775-783 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2019.12.004. (PMID: 32197766)
• 19 Sathiyakumar V, Apfeld JC, Obremskey WT. et al. Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial Using Telemedicine for Follow-Ups in an Orthopedic Trauma Population: A Pilot Study. J Orthop Trauma 2015; 29: e139-e145 DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000189.
• 20 Waschkau A, Flägel K, Goetz K. et al. Evaluation of attitudes towards telemedicine as a basis for successful implementation: A cross-sectional survey among postgraduate trainees in family medicine in Germany. Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes 2020; 156: 75-81 DOI: 10.1016/j.zefq.2020.07.001.
• 21 Nerlich M, Herbst T, Ernstberger A. et al. Opportunities of Telemedicine for Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery. Int J Travel Med Glob Health 2019; 7: 72-78 DOI: 10.15171/ijtmgh.2019.17.
• 22 Brauns H-J, Loos W. Telemedizin in Deutschland: Stand – Hemmnisse – Perspektiven. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz 2015; 58: 1068-1073 DOI: 10.1007/s00103-015-2223-5.
• 23 Nohl-Deryk P, Brinkmann J, Gerlach F. et al. Hürden bei der Digitalisierung der Medizin in Deutschland – eine Expertenbefragung. Gesundheitswesen 2018; 80: 939-945 DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-121010. (PMID: 29301149)
• 24 Makhni MC, Riew GJ, Sumathipala MG. Telemedicine in Orthopaedic Surgery: Challenges and Opportunities. J Bone Jt Surg 2020; 102: 1109-1115 DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.20.00452. (PMID: 32618908)
• 25 Klinische Tests an Knochen, Gelenken und Muskeln: Untersuchungen, Zeichen, Phänomene. Buckup J, Hoffmann R. 6. StuttgartNew York: Thieme; 2019
• 26 Iyer M. Clinical Examination in Orthopedics. London: Springer; 2012
• 27 Jaenisch M, Kohlhof H, Touet A. et al. Evaluation of the Feasibility of a Telemedical Examination of the Hip and Pelvis – Early Lessons from the COVID-19 Pandemic. Z Für Orthop Unfallchirurgie 2021; 159: 39-46 DOI: 10.1055/a-1289-0779.
• 28 Welle K, Täger S, Hackenberg RK. et al. Examining the Hand in the Video Consultation. Z Orthop Unfall 2021; 159: 202-208 DOI: 10.1055/a-1304-3593. (PMID: 33477179)
• 29 Scheidt S, Kehrer M, Jaenisch M. et al. A Feasibility Pilot Study on the Use of Telemedicine for the Examination of the Knee Joint. Z Orthop Unfall 2020; 160: 93-98 DOI: 10.1055/a-1246-3615. (PMID: 33233013)
• 30 Jansen T, Gathen M, Touet A. et al. Spine Examination during COVID-19 Pandemic via Video Consultation. Z Orthop Unfall 2021; 159: 193-201 DOI: 10.1055/a-1283-7160. (PMID: 33530112)
• 31 Rabin A, Dolkart O, Kazum E. et al. Shoulder assessment by smartphone: a valid alternative for times of social distancing. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2021; DOI: 10.1007/s00402-021-03762-x. (PMID: 33439302)
• 32 Iyer S, Shafi K, Lovecchio F. et al. The Spine Telehealth Physical Examination: Strategies for Success. HSS J 2021; 17: 14-17 DOI: 10.1177/1556331620974954. (PMID: 33967636)
• 33 Lamplot JD, Pinnamaneni S, Swensen-Buza S. et al. The Virtual Shoulder and Knee Physical Examination. Orthop J Sports Med 2020; 8: 232596712096286 DOI: 10.1177/2325967120962869. (PMID: 33614791)
• 34 Lamplot JD, Pinnamaneni S, Swensen-Buza S. et al. The Knee Examination for Video Telemedicine Encounters. HSS J 2021; 17: 80-84 DOI: 10.1177/1556331620975039. (PMID: 33967647)
• 35 Laskowski ER, Johnson SE, Shelerud RA. et al. The Telemedicine Musculoskeletal Examination. Mayo Clin Proc 2020; 95: 1715-1731 DOI: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2020.05.026. (PMID: 32753146)
• 36 Lawton CD, Swensen-Buza S, Awender JF. et al. The Elbow Physical Examination for Telemedicine Encounters. HSS J 2021; 17: 65-69 DOI: 10.1177/1556331620975040. (PMID: 33967644)
• 37 Tanaka MJ, Oh LS, Martin SD. et al. Telemedicine in the Era of COVID-19: The Virtual Orthopaedic Examination. J Bone Jt Surg 2020; 102: e57 DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.20.00609. (PMID: 32341311)
• 38 Eble SK, Hansen OB, Ellis SJ. et al. The Virtual Foot and Ankle Physical Examination. Foot Ankle Int 2020; 41: 1017-1026 DOI: 10.1177/1071100720941020. (PMID: 32639852)
• 39 Swensen Buza S, Lawton CD, Lamplot JD. et al. The Hip Physical Examination for Telemedicine Encounters. HSS J 2021; 17: 75-79 DOI: 10.1177/1556331620975708. (PMID: 33967646)
• 40 Wahezi SE, Duarte RA, Yerra S. et al. Telemedicine During COVID-19 and Beyond: A Practical Guide and Best Practices Multidisciplinary Approach for the Orthopedic and Neurologic Pain Physical Examination. Pain Physician 2020; 23: S205-S238 (PMID: 32942812)
• 41 Yoon JW, Welch RL, Alamin T. et al. Remote Virtual Spinal Evaluation in the Era of COVID-19. Int J Spine Surg 2020; 14: 433-440 DOI: 10.14444/7057. (PMID: 32699768)
• 42 Van Nest DS, Ilyas AM, Rivlin M. Telemedicine Evaluation and Techniques in Hand Surgery. J Hand Surg Glob Online 2020; 2: 240-245 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsg.2020.05.006. (PMID: 32835184)
• 43 Sprowls GR, Brown JC, Robin BN. The Shoulder Telehealth Assessment Tool in Transition to Distance Orthopedics. Arthrosc Tech 2020; 9: e1673-e1681 DOI: 10.1016/j.eats.2020.07.008. (PMID: 33294325)
• 44 Ekeland AG, Bowes A, Flottorp S. Effectiveness of telemedicine: A systematic review of reviews. Int J Med Inf 2010; 79: 736-771 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2010.08.006. (PMID: 20884286)
• 45 Gillman-Wells CC, Sankar TK, Vadodaria S. COVID-19 Reducing the Risks: Telemedicine is the New Norm for Surgical Consultations and Communications. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2021; 45: 343-348 DOI: 10.1007/s00266-020-01907-8. (PMID: 32885319)
• 46 Imlach F, McKinlay E, Middleton L. et al. Telehealth consultations in general practice during a pandemic lockdown: survey and interviews on patient experiences and preferences. BMC Fam Pract 2020; 21: 269 DOI: 10.1186/s12875-020-01336-1. (PMID: 33308161)
• 47 Iyengar K, Jain VK, Vaishya R. Pitfalls in telemedicine consultations in the era of COVID 19 and how to avoid them. Diabetes Metab Syndr Clin Res Rev 2020; 14: 797-799 DOI: 10.1016/j.dsx.2020.06.007.
• 48 Johnsen TM, Norberg BL, Kristiansen E. et al. Suitability of Video Consultations During the COVID-19 Pandemic Lockdown: Cross-sectional Survey Among Norwegian General Practitioners. J Med Internet Res 2021; 23: e26433 DOI: 10.2196/26433. (PMID: 33465037)
• 49 Kidholm K, Jensen LK, Kjølhede T. et al. Validity of the Model for Assessment of Telemedicine: A Delphi study. J Telemed Telecare 2018; 24: 118-125 DOI: 10.1177/1357633X16686553. (PMID: 28024442)