An Electronic Medical Record Intervention to Increase Early Screening Rates for Gestational Diabetes

Abstract

Objectives Our objective was to implement an electronic medical record reminder to perform the early gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) screening test and to evaluate if this intervention increased screening rates.

Study Design We performed a retrospective chart review of all deliveries at Mount Sinai West in January 2020 to determine the number of patients that met criteria for and actually underwent early GDM screening. A total of 314 patients had complete charts with pregnancy data. The following American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG)-defined risk factors were collected: body mass index greater than 25 (Asians greater than 23), history of GDM, history of macrosomia, hypertension (systolic >140 or diastolic >90), polycystic ovarian syndrome, hemoglobin A1c above 5.7, cardiovascular disease, and family history of diabetes. We used this data to advocate for and design an electronic medical record-based intervention to remind obstetric providers to complete the early glucose challenge test screening for eligible patients at the first prenatal visit.

Results Our investigation confirms there is a low adherence rate of 12% at our facility to ACOG's updated early GDM screening guidelines (12 out of 97 patients). Furthermore, nearly one-fifth (16 out of 85) of eligible patients who did not receive screening were eventually diagnosed with GDM by screening at 24 to 28 weeks. After implementing an electronic medical record reminder at the initial prenatal visit, screening rates more than doubled to 28% (33 out of 115 eligible patients). The most common diabetic risk factors were high-risk ethnic background, current hypertension, family history of diabetes, history of polycystic ovarian syndrome, and body mass index of 40 or greater.

Conclusion Our data suggests that obstetricians could be missing an opportunity to improve maternal and neonatal outcomes by diagnosing GDM earlier in pregnancy, as recommended by ACOG. The adoption of an electronic medical record reminder seems to improve the rate of indicated early GDM screening.

Key Points

• There is a low adherence rate of 16% to ACOG's updated early GDM screening guidelines.

• After implementing an electronic medical record alert at the initial prenatal visit, screening rates nearly doubled.

• Screening rates were higher at prenatal practices with resident physician involvement in patient care.

Keywords

gestational diabetes - prenatal care - obstetric - quality improvement

Note

The authors did not request funding or any financial support for this research.

Publication History

Received: 18 April 2022

Accepted: 16 August 2022

Accepted Manuscript online:
16 August 2022

Article published online:
17 January 2023

• References

• 1 Ehrenberg HM, Durnwald CP, Catalano P, Mercer BM. The influence of obesity and diabetes on the risk of cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 191 (03) 969-974
• 2 Yogev Y, Xenakis EM, Langer O. The association between preeclampsia and the severity of gestational diabetes: the impact of glycemic control. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 191 (05) 1655-1660
• 3 Rosenstein MG, Cheng YW, Snowden JM, Nicholson JM, Doss AE, Caughey AB. The risk of stillbirth and infant death stratified by gestational age in women with gestational diabetes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012; 206 (04) 309.e1-309.e7
• 4 Gestational diabetes mellitus. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 190. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol 2018; 131: e49-e64
• 5 Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Kit BK, Flegal KM. Prevalence of childhood and adult obesity in the United States, 2011-2012. JAMA 2014; 311 (08) 806-814
• 6 Harper LM, Jauk V, Longo S, Biggio JR, Szychowski JM, Tita AT. Early gestational diabetes screening in obese women: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2020; 222 (05) 495.e1-495.e8
• 7 Dennison RA, Fox RA, Ward RJ, Griffin SJ, Usher-Smith JA. Women's views on screening for Type 2 diabetes after gestational diabetes: a systematic review, qualitative synthesis and recommendations for increasing uptake. Diabet Med 2020; 37 (01) 29-43
• 8 Klatt TE, Hopp E. Effect of a best-practice alert on the rate of influenza vaccination of pregnant women. Obstet Gynecol 2012; 119 (2 Pt 1): 301-305
• 9 McCambridge J, Witton J, Elbourne DR. Systematic review of the Hawthorne effect: new concepts are needed to study research participation effects. J Clin Epidemiol 2014; 67 (03) 267-277
• 10 Mourad M, Gupta S, Rebarber A, Saltzman DH, Fox NS. Effect of resident participation on outcomes in high-order cesarean deliveries. Obstet Gynecol 2015; 126 (Suppl 4): 21S-26S
• 11 Bougie O, Zuckerman SL, Switzer N, How J, Sey M. Influence of resident involvement in obstetrics and gynaecology surgery on surgical outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2018; 40 (09) 1170-1177
• 12 The use and development of checklists in obstetrics and gynecology. Committee Opinion No. 680. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol 2016; 128: e237-e240
• 13 Vesco KK, Dietz PM, Bulkley J. et al. A system-based intervention to improve postpartum diabetes screening among women with gestational diabetes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012; 207 (04) 283.e1-283.e6