Open Access
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Neuropediatrics 2022; 53(06): 423-431
DOI: 10.1055/a-1889-8544
Original Article

No Differences in Cerebral Immunohistochemical Markers following Remote Ischemic Postconditioning in Newborn Piglets with Hypoxia–Ischemia

Hannah B. Andersen*
1   Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
,
1   Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
,
Kristine Bennedsgaard
1   Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
,
Sigrid Kerrn-Jespersen
1   Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
,
Kasper J. Kyng
1   Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
,
Ida E. Holm
2   Department of Pathology, Randers Regional Hospital, Randers, Denmark
,
Tine B. Henriksen
1   Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
› Institutsangaben

Funding The study was supported by the Aase and Ejnar Danielsens Foundations, The Health Research Foundation of Central Denmark Region, Aarhus University Research Foundation, Randers Regional Hospital, and The Elsass Foundation.
Preview

Abstract

Background Despite therapeutic hypothermia, neonates with hypoxic–ischemic encephalopathy still develop neurological disabilities. We have previously investigated neuroprotection by remote ischemic postconditioning (RIPC) in newborn piglets following hypoxia–ischemia (HI). The aim of this study was to further investigate potential effects of RIPC on cerebral immunohistochemical markers related to edema, apoptosis, and angiogenesis.

Methods Brain expression of aquaporin 4, caspase-3, B-cell lymphoma 2, and vascular endothelial growth factor was analyzed by immunohistochemistry in 23 piglets, randomly selected from a larger study of RIPC after HI. Twenty animals were subjected to 45 minutes of HI and randomized to treatment with and without RIPC, while three animals were randomized to sham procedures. RIPC was conducted by four conditioning cycles of 5-minute ischemia and reperfusion. Piglets were euthanized 72 hours after the HI insult.

Results Piglets subjected to HI treated with and without RIPC were similar at baseline and following the HI insult. However, piglets randomized to HI alone had longer duration of low blood pressure during the insult. We found no differences in the brain expression of the immunohistochemical markers in any regions of interest or the whole brain between the two HI groups.

Conclusion RIPC did not influence brain expression of markers related to edema, apoptosis, or angiogenesis in newborn piglets at 72 hours after HI. These results support previous findings of limited neuroprotective effect by this RIPC protocol. Our results may have been affected by the time of assessment, use of fentanyl as anesthetic, or limitations related to our immunohistochemical methods.

* These authors have contributed equally to this work and share first authorship.


Supplementary Material



Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 07. Dezember 2021

Angenommen: 02. Juni 2022

Accepted Manuscript online:
01. Juli 2022

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
28. August 2022

© 2022. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany