Radiation exposure during modern therapeutic endoscopic ultrasound procedures and standard alternatives

Abstract

Background and study aims Therapeutic EUS (t-EUS) is increasingly being adopted in clinical practice in tertiary referral centers; however, little is known about radiation exposure (RE) metrics and diagnostic reference limits for it.

Methods Kerma-area product (KAP [Gy·cm²]), Air Kerma and fluoroscopy time were retrospectively evaluated for all consecutive t-EUS procedures performed in San Raffaele Institute between 2019 and 2021. For EUS-guided choledochoduodenostomies (EUS-CDS) and gastroenterostomies (EUS-GE), an equal number of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatographies (ERCPs) plus metal stenting and duodenal stents were included respectively for comparison.

Results Data from 141 t-EUS procedures were retrieved (49 % pancreatic cancer, 38 % peripancreatic fluid collections). EUS-CDS (N = 44) were mainly performed fluoroless, while ERCPs required a significantly higher RE (KAP = 25 [17–55], P < 0.0001). Fluid collection drainage (EUS-FCD) with lumen apposing metal stents (LAMS, N = 26) were performed fluoroless, while EUS-FCD with double-pigtail plastic stents (DPPS, N = 28) required higher RE (KAP = 23 [13–45]). EUS-guided gallbladder drainage (EUS-GBD, N = 6) required scarce RE (KAP = 9 [3–21]) for coaxial DPPS placement. EUS-GE (N = 27) required higher RE than duodenal stenting (KAP = 44 [28–88] versus 29 [19–46], P = 0.03). EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomies (EUS-HGS, N = 10) had the highest RE among t-EUS procedures (KAP = 81 [49–123]). Procedure complexity or intervening complications were evaluated and resulted in higher RE within each procedure.

Conclusions t-EUS procedures have different RE (P < 0.000001). EUS-CDS, EUS-GBD, and EUS-FCD with LAMS can be performed with no-to-mild radioscopy, unlike standard alternatives. However, radioscopy remains essential in case of technical difficulties or complications. EUS-GE and EUS-HGS involve a high RE. Endoscopists involved in t-EUS might experience RE higher than category standards, which indicates a need for increased awareness and personalized preventive measures.

Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 21. Februar 2022

Angenommen nach Revision: 12. Mai 2022

Accepted Manuscript online:
16. Mai 2022

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
15. August 2022

• References

• 1 Schalk van der Merwe AW, van Wanrooij RLJ, Bronswijk M. et al. Therapeutic endoscopic ultrasound: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline. Endoscopy 2022; 54: 185-205
• 2 Vañó E, Miller DL, Martin CJ. et al. ICRP Publication 135: Diagnostic Reference Levels in Medical Imaging. 2017; 46: 1-144
• 3 Vanella G, Dell’anna G, Arcidiacono PG. Plastic versus metal EUS-guided drainage of pancreatic fluid collections: Do we really know when to use the hard way?. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2021;
• 4 Bronswijk M, Vanella G, Petrone MC. et al. EUS-guided gastroenterostomy: Less is more! The wireless EUS-guided gastroenterostomy simplified technique. VideoGIE 2020; 5: 442
• 5 Vanella G, Bronswijk M, Maleux G. et al. EUS-guided intrahepatic biliary drainage: a large retrospective series and subgroup comparison between percutaneous drainage in hilar stenoses or postsurgical anatomy. Endosc Int Open 2020; 08: E1782-E1794
• 6 Testoni PA, Mariani A, Aabakken L. et al. Papillary cannulation and sphincterotomy techniques at ERCP: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Clinical Guideline. Endoscopy 2016; 48: 657-683
• 7 Dumonceau JM, Garcia-Fernandez FJ, Verdun FR. et al. Radiation protection in digestive endoscopy: European Society of Digestive Endoscopy (ESGE) guideline. Endoscopy 2012; 44: 408-421
• 8 Hayashi S, Takenaka M, Hosono M. et al. Diagnostic reference levels for fluoroscopy-guided gastrointestinal procedures in Japan from the REX-GI Study: A nationwide multicentre prospective observational study. Lancet Reg Heal – West Pacific 2022; 20: 100376
• 9 Takenaka M, Hosono M, Rehani MM. et al. Comparison of radiation exposure between endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage and transpapillary drainage by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for pancreatobiliary diseases. Dig Endosc 2021; 34: 579-586
• 10 Jin Z, Wei Y, Lin H. et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided versus endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-guided biliary drainage for primary treatment of distal malignant biliary obstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Dig Endosc 2020; 32: 16-26
• 11 Teoh AYB, Kitano M, Itoi T. et al. Endosonography-guided gallbladder drainage versus percutaneous cholecystostomy in very high-risk surgical patients with acute cholecystitis: An international randomised multicentre controlled superiority trial (DRAC 1). Gut 2020; 69: 1085-1091
• 12 Vanella G, Dell’Anna G, Bronswijk M. et al. EUS-guided gallbladder drainage and subsequent peroral endoscopic cholecystolithotomy: A tool to reduce chemotherapy discontinuation in neoplastic patients?. VideoGIE 2021;
• 13 DeWitt JM, Arain M, Chang KJ. et al. AGA White Paper: Interventional Endoscopic Ultrasound – Current Status and Future Directions. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2021; 19: 24-40
• 14 Bang JY, Navaneethan U, Hasan MK. et al. Non-superiority of lumen-apposing metal stents over plastic stents for drainage of walled-off necrosis in a randomised trial. Gut 2019; 68: 1200-1209
• 15 van Wanrooij RLJ, Vanella G, Bronswijk M. et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy versus duodenal stenting for malignant gastric outlet obstruction: an international, multicenter, propensity score-matched comparison. Endoscopy 2022;
• 16 Vanella G, Dell’Anna G, Bronswijk M. et al. Redo-endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy for the management of distal flange misdeployment: trust your orojejunal catheter. Endoscopy 2022;
• 17 Papanastasiou E, Protopsaltis A, Finitsis S. et al. Institutional Diagnostic reference levels and peak skin doses in selected diagnostic and therapeutic interventional radiology procedures. Phys Med 2021; 89: 63-71
• 18 van Wanrooij RLJ, Bronswijk M, Kunda R. et al. Therapeutic endoscopic ultrasound: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Technical Review. Endoscopy 2022; 54: 310-332
• 19 Bang JY, Hough M, Hawes RH. et al. Use of artificial intelligence to reduce radiation exposure at fluoroscopy-guided endoscopic procedures. Am J Gastroenterol 2020; 115: 555-561