Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes 2022; 130(05): 303-312
DOI: 10.1055/a-1816-8203

‘That Time of the Month’ – Investigating the Influence of the Menstrual Cycle and Oral Contraceptives on the Brain Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Verena Schuster
1   Laboratory for Multimodal Neuroimaging, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Marburg, Germany
Andreas Jansen
1   Laboratory for Multimodal Neuroimaging, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Marburg, Germany
2   Core-Unit Brainimaging, Faculty of Medicine, University of Marburg, Germany
› Author Affiliations


The stereotypic and oversimplified relationship between female sex hormones and undesirable behavior dates to the earliest days of human society, as already the ancient Greek word for the uterus, “hystera” indicated an aversive connection. Remaining and evolving throughout the centuries, transcending across cultures and various aspects of everyday life, its perception was only recently reframed. Contemporarily, the complex interaction of hormonal phases (i. e., the menstrual cycle), hormonal medication (i. e., oral contraceptives), women’s psychological well-being, and behavior is the subject of multifaceted and more reflected discussions. A driving force of this ongoing paradigm shift was the introduction of this highly interesting and important topic into the realm of scientific research. This refers to neuroscientific research as it enables a multimodal approach combining aspects of physiology, medicine, and psychology. Here a growing body of literature points towards significant alterations of both brain function, such as lateralization of cognitive functions, and structure, such as gray matter concentrations, due to fluctuations and changes in hormonal levels. This especially concerns female sex hormones. However, the more research is conducted within this field, the less reliable these observations and derived insights appear. This may be due to two particular factors: measurement inconsistencies and diverse hormonal phases accompanied by interindividual differences. The first factor refers to the prominent unreliability of one of the primarily utilized neuroscientific research instruments: functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). This unreliability is seemingly present in paradigms and analyses, and their interplay, and is additionally affected by the second factor. In more detail, hormonal phases and levels further influence neuroscientific results obtained through fMRI as outcomes vary drastically across different cycle phases and medication. This resulting vast uncertainty thus tremendously hinders the further advancement of our understanding of how female sex hormones might alter brain structure and function and, ultimately, behavior.

This review summarizes parts of the current state of research and outlines the essential requirements to further investigate and understand the female brain’s underlying physiological and anatomical features.

Publication History

Received: 30 September 2021
Received: 15 March 2022

Accepted: 31 March 2022

Article published online:
23 May 2022

© 2022. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

  • References

  • 1 Tasca C, Rapetti M, Carta MG. et al. Women and hysteria in the history of mental health. Clin Pract Epidemiol Ment Health 2012; 8: 110-119
  • 2 Welz A, Huffziger S, Reinhard I. et al. Anxiety and rumination moderate menstrual cycle effects on mood in daily life. Women Health 2016; 56: 540-560
  • 3 Rehbein E, Hornung J, Sundström Poromaa I. et al. Shaping of the female human brain by sex hormones – a review. Neuroendocrinology 2020; 111: 183-206
  • 4 Sundström Poromaa I, Gingnell M. Menstrual cycle influence on cognitive function and emotion processing-from a reproductive perspective. Front Neurosci 2014; 8: 380-380
  • 5 Dubol M, Epperson CN, Sacher J. et al. Neuroimaging the menstrual cycle: A multimodal systematic review. Front Neuroendocrinol 2021; 60: 100878
  • 6 Raghava N, Das BC, Ray SK. Neuroprotective effects of estrogen in CNS injuries: Insights from animal models. Neurosci Neuroecon 2017; 6: 15-29
  • 7 Tsai M-J, O’Malley BW. Molecular mechanisms of action of steroid/thyroid receptor superfamily members. Ann Rev Biochem 1994; 63: 451-486
  • 8 Österlund MK, Hurd YL. Estrogen receptors in the human forebrain and the relation to neuropsychiatric disorders. Prog Neurobiol 2001; 64: 251-267
  • 9 Baudry M, Bi X, Aguirre C. Progesterone – estrogen interactions in synaptic plasticity and neuroprotection. Neuroscience 2013; 239: 280-294
  • 10 Bali N, Arimoto JM, Iwata N. et al. Differential responses of progesterone receptor membrane component-1 (Pgrmc1) and the classical progesterone receptor (Pgr) to 17β-estradiol and progesterone in hippocampal subregions that support synaptic remodeling and neurogenesis. Endocrinology 2012; 153: 759-769
  • 11 Giatti S, Boraso M, Melcangi RC. et al. Neuroactive steroids, their metabolites, and neuroinflammation. J Mol Endocrinol 2012; 49: R125-R134
  • 12 Hausmann M, Güntürkün O. Steroid fluctuations modify functional cerebral asymmetries: The hypothesis of progesterone-mediated interhemispheric decoupling. Neuropsychologia 2000; 38: 1362-1374
  • 13 Stephan KE, Marshall JC, Penny WD. et al. Interhemispheric integration of visual processing during task-driven lateralization. J Neurosci 2007; 27: 3512-3522
  • 14 Frost JA. Language processing is strongly left lateralized in both sexes: Evidence from functional MRI. Brain 1999; 122: 199-208
  • 15 Josse G, Tzourio-Mazoyer N. Hemispheric specialization for language. Brain Res Rev 2004; 44: 1-12
  • 16 Olulade OA, Seydell-Greenwald A, Chambers CE. et al. The neural basis of language development: Changes in lateralization over age. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2020; 117: 23477-23483
  • 17 Fink GR, Marshall JC, Shah NJ. et al. Line bisection judgments implicate right parietal cortex and cerebellum as assessed by fMRI. Neurology 2000; 54: 1324-1331
  • 18 Corballis PM. Visuospatial processing and the right-hemisphere interpreter. Brain Cogn 2003; 53: 171-176
  • 19 Jansen A, Flöel A, Van Randenborgh J. et al. Crossed cerebro-cerebellar language dominance. Hum Brain Mapp 2005; 24: 165-172
  • 20 Knecht S, Dräger B, Deppe M. et al. Handedness and hemispheric language dominance in healthy humans. Brain 2000; 123: 2512-2518
  • 21 Pujol J, Deus J, Losilla JM. et al. Cerebral lateralization of language in normal left-handed people studied by functional MRI. Neurology 1999; 52: 1038-1043
  • 22 Fakhri M, Oghabian MA, Vedaei F. et al. Atypical language lateralization: An fMRI study in patients with cerebral lesions. Funct Neurol 2013; 28: 55-61
  • 23 Kinsbourne M, Bruce R. Shift in visual laterality within blocks of trials. Acta Psychologica 1987; 66: 139-155
  • 24 Mesulam MM. A cortical network for directed attention and unilateral neglect. Ann Neurol 1981; 10: 309-325
  • 25 O’Regan L, Serrien DJ. Individual differences and hemispheric asymmetries for language and spatial attention. Front Hum Neurosci 2018; 12: 380
  • 26 Hausmann M, Güntürkün O. Sex differences in functional cerebral asymmetries in a repeated measures design. Brain Cogn 1999; 41: 263-275
  • 27 Shaywitz BA, Shaywltz SE, Pugh KR. et al. Sex differences in the functional organization of the brain for language. Nature 1995; 373: 607
  • 28 Weis S, Hausmann M, Stoffers B. et al. Dynamic changes in functional cerebral connectivity of spatial cognition during the menstrual cycle. Hum Brain Mapp 2011; 32: 1544-1556
  • 29 Weis S, Hausmann M, Stoffers B. et al. Estradiol modulates functional brain organization during the menstrual cycle: an analysis of interhemispheric inhibition. J Neurosci 2008; 28: 13401-13410
  • 30 Weis S, Hausmann M. Sex hormones: modulators of interhemispheric inhibition in the human brain. The Neuroscientist  0 16: 132-138
  • 31 Hausmann M. Why sex hormones matter for neuroscience: A very short review on sex, sex hormones, and functional brain asymmetries. J Neurosci Res 2017; 95: 40-49
  • 32 Chiarello C, Maxfield L. Varieties of interhemispheric inhibition, or how to keep a good hemisphere down. Brain Cogn 1996; 30: 81-108
  • 33 Hughes CM, Peters A. Symmetric synapses formed by callosal afferents in rat visual cortex 1992; 583: 271-278
  • 34 Kawaguchi Y. Receptor subtypes involved in callosally-induced postsynaptic potentials in rat frontal agranular cortex in vitro. Exp Brain Res 1992; 88: 33-40
  • 35 Smith SS, Waterhouse BD, Chapin JK. et al. Progesterone alters GABA and glutamate responsiveness: A possible mechanism for its anxiolytic action. Brain Research 1987; 400: 353-359
  • 36 Hausmann M. Hemispheric asymmetry in spatial attention across the menstrual cycle. Neuropsychologia 2005; 43: 1559-1567
  • 37 Pletzer B, Petasis O, Cahill L. Switching between forest and trees: opposite relationship of progesterone and testosterone to global-local processing. Horm Behav 2014; 66: 257-266
  • 38 Pletzer B, Kronbichler M, Nuerk H-C. et al. Hormonal contraceptives masculinize brain activation patterns in the absence of behavioral changes in two numerical tasks. Brain Res 2014; 1543: 128-142
  • 39 Helmstaedter C, Jockwitz C, Witt J-A. Menstrual cycle corrupts reliable and valid assessment of language dominance: Consequences for presurgical evaluation of patients with epilepsy. Seizure 2015; 28: 26-31
  • 40 Biswal BB. Resting state fMRI: A personal history. NeuroImage 2012; 62: 938-944
  • 41 Fox MD, Snyder AZ, Vincent JL. et al. The human brain is intrinsically organized into dynamic, anticorrelated functional networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2005; 102: 9673-9678
  • 42 Greicius MD, Krasnow B, Reiss AL. et al. Functional connectivity in the resting brain: A network analysis of the default mode hypothesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2003; 100: 253-258
  • 43 Weis S, Hodgetts S, Hausmann M. Sex differences and menstrual cycle effects in cognitive and sensory resting state networks. Brain Cogn 2019; 131: 66-73
  • 44 Andrews-Hanna JR, Reidler JS, Sepulcre J. et al. Functional-anatomic fractionation of the brain’s default network. Neuron 2010; 65: 550-562
  • 45 Raichle ME. The restless brain: How intrinsic activity organizes brain function. Phil Trans R Soc 2015; 370: 20140172
  • 46 Petersen N, Kilpatrick LA, Goharzad A. et al. Oral contraceptive pill use and menstrual cycle phase are associated with altered resting state functional connectivity. NeuroImage 2014; 90: 24-32
  • 47 Hjelmervik H, Hausmann M, Osnes B. et al. Resting states are resting traits-an FMRI study of sex differences and menstrual cycle effects in resting state cognitive control networks. PloS One 2014; 9: e103492-e103492
  • 48 De Bondt T, Smeets D, Pullens P. et al. Stability of resting state networks in the female brain during hormonal changes and their relation to premenstrual symptoms. Brain Res 2015; 1624: 275-285
  • 49 Arélin K, Mueller K, Barth C. et al. Progesterone mediates brain functional connectivity changes during the menstrual cycle-a pilot resting state MRI study. Front Neurosci 2015; 9: 44
  • 50 Maki PM, Rich JB, Shayna RR. Implicit memory varies across the menstrual cycle: estrogen effects in young women. Neuropsychologia 2002; 40: 518-529
  • 51 Rumberg B, Baars A, Fiebach J. et al. Cycle and gender-specific cerebral activation during a verb generation task using fMRI: Comparison of women in different cycle phases, under oral contraception, and men. Neurosci Res 2010; 66: 366-371
  • 52 Bayer J, Schultz H, Gamer M. et al. Menstrual-cycle dependent fluctuations in ovarian hormones affect emotional memory. Neurobiol Learn Mem 2014; 110: 55-63
  • 53 Jang D, Elfenbein HA. Menstrual cycle effects on mental health outcomes: A meta-analysis. Arch Suicide Res 2019; 23: 312-332
  • 54 Mihm M, Gangooly S, Muttukrishna S. The normal menstrual cycle in women. Anim Reprod Sci 2010; 124: 229-236
  • 55 Bale TL, Epperson CN. Sex differences and stress across the lifespan. Nat Neurosci 2015; 18: 1413-1420
  • 56 Petitti DB. Combination estrogen – progestin oral contraceptives. New Engl J Med 2003; 349: 1443-1450
  • 57 Heßling A. Bundeszentrale für Gesundheitliche Aufklärung (Eds.). Verhütungsverhalten Erwachsener 2011: Aktuelle repräsentative Studie im Rahmen einer telefonischen Mehrthemenbefragung. 1. Aufl. Köln: BZgA; 2011
  • 58 Alvergne A, Lummaa V. Does the contraceptive pill alter mate choice in humans?. Trends Ecol Evol 2010; 25: 171-179
  • 59 Abler B, Kumpfmüller D, Grön G. et al. Neural correlates of erotic stimulation under different levels of female sexual hormones. PLoS ONE 2013; 8: e54447-e54447
  • 60 Hubbard EM, Piazza M, Pinel P. et al. Interactions between number and space in parietal cortex. Nat Rev Neurosci 2005; 6: 435
  • 61 Bonenberger M, Groschwitz RC, Kumpfmueller D. et al. It’s all about money: Oral contraception alters neural reward processing. Neuroreport 2013; 24: 951-955
  • 62 Marecková K, Perrin JS, Nawaz Khan I. et al. Hormonal contraceptives, menstrual cycle and brain response to faces. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci 2014; 9: 191-200
  • 63 Lentini E, Kasahara M, Arver S. et al. Sex differences in the human brain and the impact of sex chromosomes and sex hormones. Cereb Cortex 2012; 23: 2322-2336
  • 64 Ruigrok ANV, Salimi-Khorshidi G, Lai M-C. et al. A meta-analysis of sex differences in human brain structure. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2014; 39: 34-50
  • 65 Witte AV, Savli M, Holik A. et al. Regional sex differences in grey matter volume are associated with sex hormones in the young adult human brain. Neuroimage 2010; 49: 1205-1212
  • 66 Menzler K, Belke M, Wehrmann E. et al. Men and women are different: Diffusion tensor imaging reveals sexual dimorphism in the microstructure of the thalamus, corpus callosum and cingulum. Neuroimage 2011; 54: 2557-2562
  • 67 Dunst B, Benedek M, Koschutnig K. et al. Sex differences in the IQ-white matter microstructure relationship: A DTI study. Brain Cogn 2014; 91: 71-78
  • 68 Protopopescu X, Butler T, Pan H. et al. Hippocampal structural changes across the menstrual cycle. Hippocampus 2008; 18: 985-988
  • 69 Lisofsky N, Mårtensson J, Eckert A. et al. Hippocampal volume and functional connectivity changes during the female menstrual cycle. Neuroimage 2015; 118: 154-162
  • 70 Barth C, Steele CJ, Mueller K. et al. In-vivo Dynamics of the Human Hippocampus across the Menstrual Cycle. Sci Rep 2016; 6: 32833-32833
  • 71 Pletzer B, Kronbichler M, Aichhorn M. et al. Menstrual cycle and hormonal contraceptive use modulate human brain structure. Brain Res 2010; 1348: 55-62
  • 72 De Bondt T, Jacquemyn Y, Van Hecke W. et al. Regional gray matter volume differences and sex-hormone correlations as a function of menstrual cycle phase and hormonal contraceptives use. Brain Res 2013; 1530: 22-31
  • 73 De Bondt T, Pullens P, Van Hecke W. et al. Reproducibility of hormone-driven regional grey matter volume changes in women using SPM8 and SPM12. Brain Struct Funct 2016; 221: 4631-4641
  • 74 Pletzer B, Harris TA, Hidalgo-Lopez E. Subcortical structural changes along the menstrual cycle: beyond the hippocampus. Sci Rep 2018; 8: 16042
  • 75 Bitzer J, Simon JA. Current issues and available options in combined hormonal contraception. Contraception 2011; 84: 342-356
  • 76 Pletzer B, Kronbichler M, Kerschbaum H. Differential effects of androgenic and anti-androgenic progestins on fusiform and frontal gray matter volume and face recognition performance. Brain Res 2015; 1596: 108-115
  • 77 Christin-Maitre S. History of oral contraceptive drugs and their use worldwide. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab 2013; 27: 3-12
  • 78 Brønnick MK, Økland I, Graugaard C. et al. The effects of hormonal contraceptives on the brain: A systematic review of neuroimaging studies. Front Psychol 2020; 11: 556577
  • 79 Pletzer BA, Kerschbaum HH. 50 years of hormonal contraception-time to find out, what it does to our brain. Front Neurosci 2014; 8: 256-256
  • 80 Giatti S, Melcangi RC, Pesaresi M. The other side of progestins: Effects in the brain. J Mol Endocrinol 2016; 57: R109-R126
  • 81 Poromaa IS, Segebladh B. Adverse mood symptoms with oral contraceptives. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2012; 91: 420-427
  • 82 Kavanaugh ML, Jerman J, Finer LB. Changes in use of long-acting reversible contraceptive methods among U.S. women, 2009-2012. Obstet Gynecol 2015; 126: 917-927
  • 83 Bürger Z, Bucher AM, Comasco E. et al. Association of levonorgestrel intrauterine devices with stress reactivity, mental health, quality of life and sexual functioning: A systematic review. Front Neuroendocrinol 2021; 63: 100943
  • 84 Pletzer B. Sex hormones and gender role relate to gray matter nolumes in sexually dimorphic brain areas. Front Neurosci 2019; 13: 592
  • 85 Luders E, Sánchez FJ, Tosun D. et al. Increased cortical thickness in male-to-female transsexualism. J Behav Brain Sci 2012; 2: 357-362
  • 86 Pol HEH, Cohen-Kettenis PT, Haren NEMV. et al. Changing your sex changes your brain: Influences of testosterone and estrogen on adult human brain structure. Eur J Endocrinol 2006; 155: S107-S114
  • 87 Guillamon A, Junque C, Gómez-Gil E. A review of the status of brain structure research in transsexualism. Arch Sex Behav 2016; 45: 1615-1648
  • 88 Nguyen HB, Loughead J, Lipner E. et al. What has sex got to do with it? The role of hormones in the transgender brain. Neuropsychopharmacology 2019; 44: 22-37
  • 89 Seiger R, Hahn A, Hummer A. et al. Subcortical gray matter changes in transgender subjects after long-term cross-sex hormone administration. Psychoneuroendocrinology 2016; 74: 371-379
  • 90 Hulshoff Pol HE, Cohen-Kettenis PT, Van Haren NEM. et al. Changing your sex changes your brain: Influences of testosterone and estrogen on adult human brain structure.. Eur J Endocrinol, Supplement 2006; 155: 91
  • 91 Sommer IEC, Cohen-Kettenis PT, van Raalten T et al. Effects of cross-sex hormones on cerebral activation during language and mental rotation: An fMRI study in transsexuals. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 2008; 18: 215–221
  • 92 Frank RT. The hormonal causes of premenstrual tension. Arch NeurPsych 1931; 26: 1053-1057
  • 93 Sommer B. The effect of menstruation on cognitive and perceptual-motor behavior: A review. Psychosom Med 1973; 35: 515-534
  • 94 Sundström Poromaa I, Gingnell M. Menstrual cycle influence on cognitive function and emotion processing-from a reproductive perspective. Front Neurosci 2014; 8: 380-380
  • 95 Pletzer B, Kronbichler M, Kerschbaum H. Differential effects of androgenic and anti-androgenic progestins on fusiform and frontal gray matter volume and face recognition performance. Brain Res 2015; 1596: 108-115
  • 96 Glatard T, Lewis LB, Ferreira da SR. et al. Reproducibility of neuroimaging analyses across operating systems. Front Neuroinform 2015; 9: 12
  • 97 Lewis L, Lepage C, Khalili-Mahani N. et al. Robustness and reliability of cortical surface reconstruction in CIVET and FreeSurfer, In Annual Meeting of the Organization for Human Brain Mapping Vancouver; 2017
  • 98 Bowring A, Maumet C, Nichols TE. Exploring the impact of analysis software on task fMRI results. Hum Brain Mapp 2019; 40: 3362-3384
  • 99 Klein A, Andersson J, Ardekani BA. et al. Evaluation of 14 nonlinear deformation algorithms applied to human brain MRI registration. Neuroimage 2009; 46: 786-802
  • 100 Kiar G, de Oliveira Castro P, Rioux P. et al. Comparing perturbation models for evaluating stability of neuroimaging pipelines. International J High Perform Comput Appl 2020; 34: 491-501
  • 101 Logothetis NK, Pauls J, Augath M. et al. Neurophysiological investigation of the basis of the fMRI signal. Nature 2001; 412: 150-157
  • 102 Elliott ML, Knodt AR, Ireland D. et al. What is the test-retest reliability of common task-fMRI measures? New empirical evidence and a meta-analysis. BioRxiv 2020; 681700
  • 103 Bennett CM, Miller MB. How reliable are the results from functional magnetic resonance imaging?. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2010; 1191: 133-155
  • 104 Herting MM, Gautam P, Chen Z. et al. Test-retest reliability of longitudinal task-based fMRI: Implications for developmental studies. Devel Cogn Neurosci 2018; 33: 17-26
  • 105 Nord CL, Gray A, Charpentier CJ. et al. Unreliability of putative fMRI biomarkers during emotional face processing. NeuroImage 2017; 156: 119-127
  • 106 Poldrack RA, Baker CI, Durnez J. et al. Scanning the horizon: Towards transparent and reproducible neuroimaging research. Nat Rev Neurosci 2017; 18: 115-126
  • 107 Schuster V, Herholz P, Zimmermann KM. et al. Comparison of fMRI paradigms assessing visuospatial processing: Robustness and reproducibility. PLOS One 2017; 12: e0186344-e0186344
  • 108 Schöning S, Engelien A, Kugel H. et al. Functional anatomy of visuo-spatial working memory during mental rotation is influenced by sex, menstrual cycle, and sex steroid hormones. Neuropsychologia 2007; 45: 3203-3214
  • 109 Wharton W, Hirshman E, Merritt P. et al. Oral contraceptives and androgenicity: Influences on visuospatial task performance in younger individuals. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 2008; 16: 156-164
  • 110 Andreano JM, Cahill L. Menstrual cycle modulation of medial temporal activity evoked by negative emotion. Neuroimage 2010; 53: 1286-1293
  • 111 De Bondt T, Jacquemyn Y, Van Hecke W. et al. Regional gray matter volume differences and sex-hormone correlations as a function of menstrual cycle phase and hormonal contraceptives use. Brain Res 2013; 1530: 22-31
  • 112 Hoekzema E, Barba-Müller E, Pozzobon C. et al. Pregnancy leads to long-lasting changes in human brain structure. Nat Neurosci 2017; 20: 287-296
  • 113 Pletzer B, Harris T, Hidalgo-Lopez E. Previous contraceptive treatment relates to grey matter volumes in the hippocampus and basal ganglia. Sci Rep 2019; 9: 11003
  • 114 Cote S, Butler R, Michaud V. et al. The regional effect of serum hormone levels on cerebral blood flow in healthy nonpregnant women. Hum Brain Mapp 2021; 42: 5677-5688
  • 115 Barth C, Villringer A, Sacher J. Sex hormones affect neurotransmitters and shape the adult female brain during hormonal transition periods. Front Neurosci 2015; 9
  • 116 Schuster V. Investigating the effects of sex hormones on the female brain – necessary prerequisites and a first insight on the influences on gray matter volume. PhD thesis. Marburg: Philipps-University;; 2020