Int J Sports Med 2022; 43(10): 881-888
DOI: 10.1055/a-1794-9567
Training & Testing

High-speed Training in a Specific Context in Soccer: Transition Games

Jose A. Asian-Clemente
1   Real Betis Balompié, Performance Department, Seville, España
2   Department of Sport sciences, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Sevilla, España
3   Football Science Institute, Granada, España
,
Alberto Rabano-Muñoz
1   Real Betis Balompié, Performance Department, Seville, España
,
Bernardo Requena
3   Football Science Institute, Granada, España
,
Luis Suarez-Arrones
2   Department of Sport sciences, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Sevilla, España
3   Football Science Institute, Granada, España
› Author Affiliations
Funding No sources of funding were used in the preparation of this article

Abstract

The aims of this study were to compare the load of three tasks designed to train features of soccer: a transition game, a small-sided game with a change of playing area, and a large-sided game. Twenty young elite players performed these tasks. Variables measured were total distance covered (DC), distance covered at 14.0–17.9 km·h−1 (DC 14.0–17.9 km·h−1), distance covered at 18.0–21 km·h−1 (DC 18–21 km·h−1), distance covered > 21 km·h−1 (DC>21 km·h−1), peak speed, accelerations and decelerations > 1.0 and > 2.5 m·s−2, player load, and rate of perceived exertion. Transition games produced greater DC 18–21 km·h−1, DC>21 km·h−1, peak speed and Acc>2.5 m·s−2 than the other drills (p<0.01) and higher DC 14–17.9 km·h−1 (p<0.01), Dec>1 m·s−2 (p<0.05) and Dec>2.5 m·s−2 (p<0.01) than the large-sided game. Both sided games produced more DC (p<0.01), Acc>1 m·s−2 (p<0.01) and player load (p<0.01 and p<0.05, respectively) than the transition game. During the small-sided game, significantly higher DC 14–17.9 km·h−1, DC 18–21 km·h−1 and DC>21 km·h−1 were recorded in comparison with the large-sided game (p<0.01). The studied parameters showed lower variation in the transition game. Coaches could use transition games to train high speed running in counter-attack contexts.



Publication History

Received: 05 July 2021

Accepted: 08 March 2022

Accepted Manuscript online:
10 March 2022

Article published online:
07 June 2022

© 2022. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany