Download PDF
Int J Sports Med 2022; 43(10): 895-901
DOI: 10.1055/a-1778-4359
Orthopedics & Biomechanics

Softball Pitching Propulsion and Performance Differences According to Body Fat Percentage

Kenzie B Friesen
1   Kinesiology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada
,
Gretchen D Oliver
2   Kinesiology, Auburn University, Auburn, United States
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Softball pitchers with a high body-fat percentage (bf%) can often be successful, despite the heightened risk of injury associated with high bf%. Given the importance of propulsion during pitching, those with high bf% may have an advantage performance-wise. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to examine the differences in ground reaction force (GRF) development between two groups of pitchers: those with a high-fat percentage (≥32 bf%) and a healthy-fat percentage (<32 bf%). Thirty-two female high-school softball pitchers (1.70±.06 m, 76.09±17.50 kg, 15±1 yrs) completed dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) scans. GRF data were collected during pitch propulsion via a force plate, pitch speed was captured using a radar gun, BMI was calculated from pitcher height and mass, and fat free mass index (FFMI) and fat mass index (FMI) were calculated using DEXA data and pitcher height. Multivariate analysis of variance revealed pitcher group GRFs differed significantly (F3,30=3.45, p=.030). Univariate follow-up analyses showed healthy bf% pitchers presented greater weight-normalized peak medial GRF (F1,30=7.17, p=.012). BMI and FFMI were positively associated with pitch speed while bf% and FMI were negatively associated with pitch speed. While pitchers can be successful and carry excess bf%, results indicate potential performance disadvantages associated with having an increased bf%.

Key words

ball speed - biomechanics - body composition - kinematics - kinetics - performance improvement


Publication History

Received: 23 October 2021

Accepted: 11 February 2022

Article published online:
01 June 2022

© 2022. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 

  • References

  • 1 Emery CA. Risk factors for injury in child and adolescent sport: A systematic review of the literature. Clin J Sport Med 2003; 13: 256-268
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Heir T, Eide G. Age, body composition, aerobic fitness and health condition as risk factors for musculoskeletal injuries in conscripts. Scand J Med Sci Sports 1996; 6: 222-227
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Jespersen E, Verhagen E, Holst R. et al. Total body fat percentage and body mass index and the association with lower extremity injuries in children: A 2.5-year longitudinal study. Br J Sports Med 2014; 48: 1497-1502
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Gómez JE, Ross SK, Calmbach WL. et al. Body fatness and increased injury rates in high school football linemen. Clin J Sport Med 1998; 8: 115-120
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Czeck MA, Raymond-Pope CJ, Stanforth PR. et al. Total and regional body composition of NCAA division I collegiate female softball athletes. Int J Sports Med 2019; 40: 645-649
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Peart A, Wadsworth D, Washington J. et al. Body composition assessment in female national collegiate athletic association division I softball athletes as a function of playing position across a multiyear time frame. J Strength Cond Res 2018; 33: 3049-3055
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 McHugh M. Oversized young athletes: A weighty concern. Br J Sports Med 2010; 44: 45-49
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Oliver G, Friesen K, Barfield JW. et al. Association of upper extremity pain with softball pitching kinematics and kinetics. Orth J Sports Med 2019; 7 2325967119865171
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Nimphius S, McGuigan MR, Suchomel TJ. et al. Variability of a “force signature” during windmill softball pitching and relationship between discrete force variables and pitch velocity. Hum Mov Sci 2016; 47: 151-158
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Seroyer ST, Nho SJ, Bach BR. et al. The kinetic chain in overhand pitching: Its potential role for performance enhancement and injury prevention. Sports Health 2010; 2: 135-146
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Nevins D, Smith L, Kensrud J. Available response time for female pitchers in youth through collegiate fastpitch softball. Sports Biomech 2022; 21: 212-225
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Oliver GD, Dwelly PM, Kwon Y-H. Kinematic motion of the windmill softball pitch in prepubescent and pubescent girls. J Strength Cond Res 2010; 24: 2400-2407
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Putnam CA. Sequential motions of body segments in striking and throwing skills: Descriptions and explanations. J Biomech 1993; 26: 125-135
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Pataky TC, Robinson MA, Vanrenterghem J. Vector field statistical analysis of kinematic and force trajectories. J Biomech 2013; 46: 2394-2401
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Harriss D, MacSween A, Atkinson G. Ethical standards in sport and exercise science research: 2020 update. Int J Sports Med 2019; 40: 813-817
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Friesen KB, Anz A, Dugas J. et al. The effects of body mass index on softball pitchers’ hip and shoulder range of motion. Sports Med Int Open 2020; 5: E8-E13
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Friesen KB. Friesen KB. The Effects of Body Composition on Female Softball Pitching Biomechanics. PhD Dissertation, Auburn University,. 2020
    PubMed
  • 18 WSBC. Official Rules of Fast Pitch Softball. In: World Baseball Softball Confederation 2017; 39: 1-97
    PubMed
  • 19 Werner SL, Guido JA, McNeice RP. et al. Biomechanics of youth windmill softball pitching. Am J Sports Med 2005; 33: 552-560
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Darke JD, Dandekar EM, Aguinaldo AL. et al. Effects of game pitch count and body mass index on pitching biomechanics in 9-to 10-year-old baseball athletes. Orth J Sports Med 2018; 6: 2325967118765655
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Fleisig GS, Barrentine SW, Zheng N. et al. Kinematic and kinetic comparison of baseball pitching among various levels of development. J Biomech 1999; 32: 1371-1375
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Kaminsky LA. ACSM’s Health-related Physical Fitness Assessment Manual. 4th ed Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2013
    Google Scholar
  • 23 Pataky TC, Vanrenterghem J, Robinson MA. et al. On the validity of statistical parametric mapping for nonuniformly and heterogeneously smooth one-dimensional biomechanical data. J Biomech 2019; 91: 114-123
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Pataky TC. One-dimensional statistical parametric mapping in Python. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin 2012; 15: 295-301
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Lamb PF, Pataky TC. The role of pelvis-thorax coupling in controlling within-golf club swing speed. J Sports Sci 2018; 36: 2164-2171
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 MacWilliams BA, Choi T, Perezous MK. et al. Characteristic ground-reaction forces in baseball pitching. Am J Sports Med 1998; 26: 66-71
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Fry KE, Wittman K, Gerke D. et al. Clinical and biomechanical evaluation of the softball pitcher: A review of current concepts and clinical commentary. Clin J Sport Med 2019; 29: 406-412
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Friesen KB, Downs JL, Wasserberger KW. et al. Body mass index affects kinematic and kinetic parameters during the windmill softball pitch. In: Southeast American College of Sports Medicine. Jacksonville, FL. 2020
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Klungland Torstveit M, Sundgot-Borgen J. Are under- and overweight female elite athletes thin and fat? A controlled study. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2012; 44: 949-957
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Friesen KB, Barfield JW, Murrah WM. et al. The association of upper-body kinematics and earned run average of national collegiate athletic association division I softball pitchers. J Strength Cond Res 2021; 35: 3145-3150
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Wasserberger KW, Friesen KB, Downs JL. et al. Comparison of pelvis and trunk kinematics between youth and collegiate windmill softball pitchers. Orth J Sports Med 2021; 9 23259671211021826
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Kibler W. Biomechanical analysis of the shoulder during tennis activities. Clin Sports Med 1995; 14: 79-85
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar