Evaluation of Care and Perspectives of Lymphedema Patients during the COVID-19 Pandemic

Abstract

Background The COVID-19 pandemic poses a major challenge for patients with chronic disease as well as their care. In particular, multiprofessional and multidisciplinary care of patients with lymphedema as well as prevention of complications and exacerbations appear significantly impaired. The aim of this study was to present the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the life satisfaction of lymphedema patients and to provide a patient perspective on healthcare provision.

Methods 100 patients of a lymphedema outpatient clinic were interviewed about the use of health services, therapies and their personal situation during the pandemic. The SWLS (Satisfaction with Life Scale) was used to evaluate life satisfaction.

Results The SWLS decreased from 24.5 ± 6.7 SD pre-pandemic to 21.4 ± 7.4 SD during the pandemic (p < 0.0001; r = -0.58). There was a trend toward fewer physician visits with increased incidence of complications. Lymphedema-typical non-physician health services showed significantly reduced access rates. Telemedical services were well accepted.

Conclusion The subjective quality of life of patients with chronic lymphedema decreased significantly and with a strong effect. This underlines that this group is particularly vulnerable to problems concerning health care during a pandemic and therefore require additional care.

Keywords

lymphedema - COVID-19 - pandemic - telemedicine - telehealth - quality of life

Publikationsverlauf

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
18. August 2022

• Literatur

• 1 Gutenbrunner C, Best N, Glaesener JJ. et al. Warum der rehabilitativen Versorgung auch und gerade während der COVID-19 Pandemie besondere Beachtung geschenkt werden muss: Ein Statement der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Physikalische und Rehabilitative Medizin (DGPRM). Physikalische Medizin, Rehabilitationsmedizin, Kurortmedizin 2020; 30: 283-286
• 2 FornerCordero I, López Martin M, Reina Gutiérrez L. et al. Management of patients with lymphatic diseases and lipoedema during the COVID-19 pandemic. Recommendations of the Spanish Group of Lymphology. Rehabilitacion 2020; 54: 276-283
• 3 DVfR. Sicherung der Teilhabe während und nach der Pandemie: Problemlagen, Herausforderungen,Handlungsoptionen. Zugriff am 10. November 2021 unter: https://www.dvfr.de/fileadmin /user_upload/DVfR/Downloads/Projektberichte/Konsultationsprozess-Berichte-6–2021/Absc hlussbericht_bf.pdf
• 4 Korzilius H, Osterloh F. Rückkehr zur Regelversorgung: Chronische Krankheiten machen keine Coronapause. Dtsch Arztebl International 2020; 117: A-1037-A-1039
• 5 Ochałek K, Kurpiewska J, Grądalski T. Lymphoedema management during the COVID-19 pandemic. Palliative Medicine in Practice 2021; 0
• 6 Seven M, Bagcivan G, Pasalak SI. et al. Experiences of breast cancer survivors during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative study. Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer 2021; 29: 6481-6493
• 7 AWMF. S2k Leitlinie Diagnostik und Therapie der Lymphödeme (Mai 2017). AWMF Reg.-Nr. 058–001.. Zugriff am 19. Januar 2022 unter: https://www.awmf.org/uploads/tx_szleitlinien/058001l_S2k_ Diagnostik_und_ Therapie_der _Lymphoedeme_2019–07.pdf
• 8 Reißhauer A, Schuester L, Kling A. et al. Prävalenz von Komorbiditäten bei Lymphödemerkrankungen. Physikalische Medizin, Rehabilitationsmedizin, Kurortmedizin 2019; 29: 282-289
• 9 Parsi K, van Rij AM, Meissner MH. et al. Triage of patients with venous and lymphatic diseases during the COVID-19 pandemic – The Venous and Lymphatic Triage and Acuity Scale (VELTAS):: A consensus document of the International Union of Phlebology (UIP), Australasian College of Phlebology (ACP), American Vein and Lymphatic Society (AVLS), American Venous Forum (AVF), European College of Phlebology (ECoP), European Venous Forum (EVF), Interventional Radiology Society of Australasia (IRSA), Latin American Venous Forum, Pan-American Society of Phlebology and Lymphology and the Venous Association of India (VAI). J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord 2020; 8: 706-710
• 10 Diener E, Emmons RA, Larsen RJ. et al. The Satisfaction With Life Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment 1985; 49: 71-75
• 11 Schumacher J, Klaiberg A, Brähler E. SWLS Satisfaction with Life Scale. In Diagnostische Verfahren zu Lebensqualität und Wohlbefinden (Diagnostik für Klinik und Praxis, Band 2): Göttingen: Hogrefe. 2003; 305-309
• 12 Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D. CONSORT Group. CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. Int J Surg 2011; 9 (08) 672-677
• 13 Kołomańska-Bogucka D, Micek A, Mazur-Bialy AI. The COVID-19 Pandemic and Levels of Physical Activity in the Last Trimester, Life Satisfaction and Perceived Stress in Late Pregnancy and in the Early Puerperium. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2022; 19 (05) 3066
• 14 Hinz A, Conrad I, Schroeter ML. et al. Psychometric properties of the Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS), derived from a large German community sample. Qual Life Res 2018; 27 (06) 1661-1670
• 15 Litke N, Daniel T, Wallacher S. et al. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on outpatient physical therapy in Germany. Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes 2021; 165: 58-67
• 16 Prevention CoDCa. Using Telehealth to Expand Access to Essential Health Services during the COVID-19 Pandemic (10.06.2020). Zugriff am 19. Januar 2022 unter: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/hcp/ telehealth.html
• 17 Monaghesh E, Hajizadeh A. The role of telehealth during COVID-19 outbreak: a systematic review based on current evidence. BMC public health 2020; 20: 1193
• 18 Hincapié MA, Gallego JC, Gempeler A. et al. Implementation and Usefulness of Telemedicine During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Scoping Review. Journal of primary care & community health 2020; 11: 2150132720980612
• 19 Budd J, Miller BS, Manning EM. et al. Digital technologies in the public-health response to COVID-19. Nature Medicine 2020; 26: 1183-1192
• 20 Noble-Jones R, Thomas MJ, Lawrence P. et al. Guidelines for managing people with lymphoedema remotely: a post-COVID-19 response document. British Journal of Nursing 2021; 30: 218-225
• 21 Bitar H, Alismail S. The role of eHealth, telehealth, and telemedicine for chronic disease patients during COVID-19 pandemic: A rapid systematic review. Digital health 2021;
• 22 Novara G, Checcucci E, Crestani A. et al. Telehealth in Urology: A Systematic Review of the Literature. How Much Can Telemedicine Be Useful During and After the COVID-19 Pandemic?. European urology 2020; 78: 786-811
• 23 Reißhauer A, Kornappel S, Tsatrafilis E. et al. Medizinische Adaptive Kompressionssysteme sind Flachstrick-Kompressionsstrümpfen in der KPE Phase II nicht unterlegen. Physikalische Medizin, Rehabilitationsmedizin, Kurortmedizin 2020; 30: 214-221
• 24 Reißhauer A, Kornappel S, Tsatrafilis E. et al. In-vivo-Druckmessungen zum Vergleich medizinischer adaptiver Kompressionssysteme mit maßangefertigter Flachstrick-Kompressionsversorgung. Phlebologie 2021; 50: 313-319
• 25 AWMF. S2k Leitlinie Medizinische Kompressionstherapie der Extremitäten mit Medizinischem Kompressionsstrumpf (MKS), Phlebologischem Kompressionsverband (PKV) und Medizinischen adaptiven Kompressionssystemen (MAK) (Dezember 2018). AWMF-Registernummer: 037/005. Zugriff am 19. Januar 2022 unter: https://www.awmf.org/uploads/tx_szleitlinien/037–005l_S3k_ Medizinische-Kompressionstherapie-MKS-PKV_2019–05.pdf
• 26 Everett J, Lawrance S, Phillips N. Rethinking decongestive lymphoedema treatment during the pandemic. British Journal of Community Nursing 2021; 26: S16-S22