Reply to the Letter to the Editor from Dr. Seet-Lee and Colleagues

Dear Editors

The authors would like to thank Dr. Seet-Lee and colleagues for their comments on our recently-published manuscript in the International Journal of Sports Medicine [1]. Dr. Seet-Lee and colleagues highlighted some inadequacies, specifically when using mean difference or raw mean difference as effect measure. However, when evaluating blood vessel density by different reliable and validated histological procedures, would it be wrong to assume, as we did, that all the obtained measurements from different staining always vary equally, directly and linearly, with the actual parameter under study? Are Dr. Seet-Lee and colleagues assuming that the results of histological observations of blood vessels, marked with different techniques and stains, are neither compatible nor governed by the same measurement scales? We regret, but we are firmly convinced that we proceeded properly. Moreover, we should not assume that standardized effect sizes will make comparisons meaningful [2]. Particularly, as the standardized mean difference indicates the difference before and after the intervention in terms of standard deviations instead of actual scores, it assumes that different outcome scales are linear transformation of each other and the standard deviation (SD) is equal across all studies [3].

Publication History

Article published online:
01 March 2022

• References

• 1 Esteves M, Monteiro MP, Duarte JA. The Effects of Physical Exercise on Tumor Vasculature: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Int J Sports Med 2021; DOI: 10.1055/a-1533-1876..
• 2 Tukey JW. Analyzing data: Sanctification or detective work?. American Psychologist 1969; 24: 83-91
• 3 Cummings P. Arguments for and against standardized mean differences (effect sizes). Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2011; 165: 592-596 DOI: 10.1001/archpediatrics.2011.97.
• 4 Buss LA, Ang AD, Hock B. et al. Effect of post-implant exercise on tumour growth rate, perfusion and hypoxia in mice. PLoS One 2020; 15: e0229290 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229290.
• 5 Morrell MBG, Alvarez-Florez C, Zhang A. et al. Vascular modulation through exercise improves chemotherapy efficacy in Ewing sarcoma. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2019; 66: e27835 DOI: 10.1002/pbc.27835.
• 6 Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J. et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med 2009; 6: e1000097 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097.
• 7 Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM. et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 2021; 372: n71 DOI: 10.1136/bmj.n71.