Thromb Haemost 2022; 122(06): 871-878
DOI: 10.1055/a-1745-2083
Invited Mini Series: Novel Clinical Concepts in Thrombosis

Stroke and Thromboembolism in Patients with Heart Failure and Sinus Rhythm: A Matter of Risk Stratification?

Angelica Rivas
1   Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
,
Mandy N. Lauw
2   Department of Hematology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
,
Renate B. Schnabel
3   Department of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Centre UKE Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
4   German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), partner site Hamburg, Germany
,
Mark Crowther
1   Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
,
Harriette G. C. Van Spall
1   Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
5   Population Health Research Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
6   Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
7   Research Institute of St. Joseph's, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
› Author Affiliations
Funding H.G.C.V.S. is funded by Canadian Institutes of Health Research and Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada. R.B.S. has received funding from the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the grant agreement No 648131, from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the grant agreement No 847770 (AFFECT-EU) and German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK e.V.) (81Z1710103); German Ministry of Research and Education (BMBF 01ZX1408A) and ERACoSysMed3 (031L0239).

Abstract

Patients with heart failure (HF) in sinus rhythm (SR) experience an increased incidence of thromboembolic events including stroke. Among patients with HF, high-quality evidence supports the use of oral anticoagulation when atrial fibrillation is present, but the benefit of anticoagulation in SR in the absence of other known indications for anticoagulation is unclear. In four randomized controlled trials (RCTs), warfarin did not improve a composite of clinical outcomes compared with aspirin or placebo in patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and SR. A recent RCT assessed the efficacy of the direct oral anticoagulant rivaroxaban versus placebo in patients with HFrEF (including mildly reduced ejection fraction), SR, and coronary artery disease. While rivaroxaban had a neutral effect on the primary composite outcome of myocardial infarction, stroke, or all-cause mortality, exploratory analyses revealed a significant reduction in strokes. It is thus possible that a subgroup of patients with HFrEF who are at high risk of stroke may benefit from anticoagulation. The challenge is to adequately identify this subgroup and to balance the potential benefit of anticoagulation with the risk of major bleeding. There is also an unmet need for evidence around anticoagulation in HF with preserved ejection fraction and SR. This review explores the current evidence around anticoagulation in patients with HF and SR, identifies challenges regarding outcome definitions and patient selection, and offers suggestions for future research.



Publication History

Received: 15 October 2021

Accepted: 18 January 2022

Accepted Manuscript online:
19 January 2022

Article published online:
21 April 2022

© 2022. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 
  • References

  • 1 Lin AY, Dinatolo E, Metra M. et al. Thromboembolism in heart failure patients in sinus rhythm: epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical trials, and future direction. JACC Hear Fail 2021; 9 (04) 243-253
  • 2 Hjalmarsson C, Fu M, Zverkova Sandström T. et al. Risk of stroke in patients with heart failure and sinus rhythm: data from the Swedish Heart Failure Registry. ESC Hear Fail 2021; 8 (01) 85-94
  • 3 Zannad F, Stough WG, Regnault V. et al. Is thrombosis a contributor to heart failure pathophysiology? Possible mechanisms, therapeutic opportunities, and clinical investigation challenges. Int J Cardiol 2013; 167 (05) 1772-1782
  • 4 Abdul-Rahim AH, Perez A-C, Fulton RL. et al; Investigators of the Controlled Rosuvastatin Multinational Study in Heart Failure (CORONA), GISSI-Heart Failure (GISSI-HF) Committees and Investigators. Risk of stroke in chronic heart failure patients without atrial fibrillation: analysis of the Controlled Rosuvastatin in Multinational Trial Heart Failure (CORONA) and the Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio della Sopravvivenza nell'Insufficienza Cardiaca-Heart Failure (GISSI-HF) Trials. Circulation 2015; 131 (17) 1486-1494
  • 5 Mehra MR, Vaduganathan M, Fu M. et al. A comprehensive analysis of the effects of rivaroxaban on stroke or transient ischaemic attack in patients with heart failure, coronary artery disease, and sinus rhythm: the COMMANDER HF trial. Eur Heart J 2019; 40 (44) 3593-3602
  • 6 Adelborg K, Szépligeti S, Sundbøll J. et al. Risk of stroke in patients with heart failure: a population-based 30-year cohort study. Stroke 2017; 48 (05) 1161-1168
  • 7 Scherbakov N, Haeusler KG, Doehner W. Ischemic stroke and heart failure: facts and numbers. ESC Hear Fail 2015; 2 (01) 1-4
  • 8 Kotecha D, Lam CSP, Van Veldhuisen DJ, Van Gelder IC, Voors AA, Rienstra M. Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and atrial fibrillation: vicious twins. J Am Coll Cardiol 2016; 68 (20) 2217-2228
  • 9 Gavaert AB, Kataria R, Zannad F. et al. Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: recent concepts in diagnosis, mechanisms and management. Heart 2022; DOI: 10.1136/heartjnl-2021-319605.
  • 10 Hage C, Löfgren L, Michopoulos F. et al. Metabolomic profile in HFpEF vs HFrEF patients. J Card Fail 2020; 26 (12) 1050-1059
  • 11 Uhm J-S, Kim J, Yu HT. et al. Stroke and systemic embolism in patients with atrial fibrillation and heart failure according to heart failure type. ESC Heart Fail 2021; 8 (02) 1582-1589
  • 12 Zhang C, Wang N, Shen N-N. et al. Net clinical benefit of antithrombotic therapy in patients with heart failure and sinus rhythm: a network meta-analysis from 5 clinical trials. Thromb Res 2020; 190: 122-128
  • 13 Beggs SAS, Rørth R, Gardner RS, McMurray JJV. Anticoagulation therapy in heart failure and sinus rhythm: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Heart 2019; 105 (17) 1325-1334
  • 14 Sulaica EM, Macaulay TE, Helbing RR, Abo-Aly M, Abdel-Latif A, Wanat MA. A comparison of anticoagulation, antiplatelet, and placebo treatment for patients with heart failure reduced ejection fraction in sinus rhythm: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Heart Fail Rev 2020; 25 (02) 207-216
  • 15 Zannad F, Anker SD, Byra WM. et al; COMMANDER HF Investigators. Rivaroxaban in patients with heart failure, sinus rhythm, and coronary disease. N Engl J Med 2018; 379 (14) 1332-1342
  • 16 Greenberg B, Neaton JD, Anker SD. et al. Association of rivaroxaban with thromboembolic events in patients with heart failure, coronary disease, and sinus rhythm: a post hoc analysis of the COMMANDER HF trial. JAMA Cardiol 2019; 4 (06) 515-523
  • 17 Mujib M, Giamouzis G, Agha SA. et al. Epidemiology of stroke in chronic heart failure patients with normal sinus rhythm: findings from the DIG stroke sub-study. Int J Cardiol 2010; 144 (03) 389-393
  • 18 Schnabel RB, Haeusler KG, Healey JS. et al. Searching for atrial fibrillation poststroke: a white paper of the AF-SCREEN international collaboration. Circulation 2019; 140 (22) 1834-1850
  • 19 Kim W, Kim EJ. Heart failure as a risk factor for stroke. J Stroke 2018; 20 (01) 33-45
  • 20 Melgaard L, Gorst-Rasmussen A, Lane DA, Rasmussen LH, Larsen TB, Lip GYH. Assessment of the CHA2DS2-VASc score in predicting ischemic stroke, thromboembolism, and death in patients with heart failure with and without atrial fibrillation. JAMA 2015; 314 (10) 1030-1038
  • 21 Hijazi Z, Oldgren J, Lindbäck J. et al; ARISTOTLE and RE-LY Investigators. A biomarker-based risk score to predict death in patients with atrial fibrillation: the ABC (age, biomarkers, clinical history) death risk score. Eur Heart J 2018; 39 (06) 477-485
  • 22 Hijazi Z, Oldgren J, Siegbahn A, Wallentin L. Application of biomarkers for risk stratification in patients with atrial fibrillation. Clin Chem 2017; 63 (01) 152-164
  • 23 Siliste RN, Antohi EL, Pepoyan S, Nakou E, Vardas P. Anticoagulation in heart failure without atrial fibrillation: gaps and dilemmas in current clinical practice. Eur J Heart Fail 2018; 20 (06) 978-988
  • 24 Friberg L, Rosenqvist M, Lip GYH. Evaluation of risk stratification schemes for ischaemic stroke and bleeding in 182 678 patients with atrial fibrillation: the Swedish Atrial Fibrillation cohort study. Eur Heart J 2012; 33 (12) 1500-1510
  • 25 Ye S, Qian M, Zhao B. et al; WARCEF Investigators. CHA2 DS2 -VASc score and adverse outcomes in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and sinus rhythm. Eur J Heart Fail 2016; 18 (10) 1261-1266
  • 26 Pisters R, Lane DA, Nieuwlaat R, de Vos CB, Crijns HJGM, Lip GYH. A novel user-friendly score (HAS-BLED) to assess 1-year risk of major bleeding in patients with atrial fibrillation: the Euro Heart Survey. Chest 2010; 138 (05) 1093-1100
  • 27 Poli D, Antonucci E, Pengo V, Testa S, Palareti G. Comparison of HAS-BLED and HAS-BED versus CHADS2 and CHA2DS2VASC stroke and bleeding scores in patients with atrial fibrillation. Am J Cardiol 2017; 119 (07) 1012-1016
  • 28 Ferreira JP, Lam CSP, Anker SD. et al. Plasma D-dimer concentrations predicting stroke risk and rivaroxaban benefit in patients with heart failure and sinus rhythm: an analysis from the COMMANDER-HF trial. Eur J Heart Fail 2021; 23 (04) 648-656
  • 29 Goette A, Kalman JM, Aguinaga L. et al. EHRA/HRS/APHRS/SOLAECE expert consensus on atrial cardiomyopathies: definition, characterisation, and clinical implication. J Arrhythm 2016; 32 (04) 247-278
  • 30 Healey JS, Connolly SJ, Gold MR. et al; ASSERT Investigators. Subclinical atrial fibrillation and the risk of stroke. N Engl J Med 2012; 366 (02) 120-129
  • 31 Singer DE, Ziegler PD, Koehler JL, Sarkar S, Passman RS. Temporal association between episodes of atrial fibrillation and risk of ischemic stroke. JAMA Cardiol 2021; 6 (12) 1364-1369
  • 32 Morgan JM, Kitt S, Gill J. et al. Remote management of heart failure using implantable electronic devices. Eur Heart J 2017; 38 (30) 2352-2360
  • 33 Theuns DAMJ, Radhoe SP, Brugts JJ. Remote monitoring of heart failure in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: current status and future needs. Sensors (Basel) 2021; 21 (11) 3763
  • 34 Lopez Perales CR, Van Spall HGC, Maeda S. et al. Mobile health applications for the detection of atrial fibrillation: a systematic review. EP Eur 2021; 23 (01) 11-28
  • 35 Kashou A, Noseworthy P. Predicting incident atrial fibrillation in sinus rhythm: more than just trusting the ‘black box’.. Heart 2021; 107 (22) 1770-1771
  • 36 Sanz-García A, Cecconi A, Vera A. et al. Electrocardiographic biomarkers to predict atrial fibrillation in sinus rhythm electrocardiograms. Heart (British Cardiac Society) 2021; 107 (22) 1813-1819