Thromb Haemost 2022; 122(08): 1326-1332
DOI: 10.1055/a-1738-1564
Coagulation and Fibrinolysis

Thrombotic Risk Determined by Protein C Receptor (PROCR) Variants among Middle-Aged and Older Adults: A Population-Based Cohort Study

Eric Manderstedt
1   Department of Environmental Science and Bioscience, Kristianstad University, Kristianstad, Sweden
,
Christer Halldén
1   Department of Environmental Science and Bioscience, Kristianstad University, Kristianstad, Sweden
,
Christina Lind-Halldén
1   Department of Environmental Science and Bioscience, Kristianstad University, Kristianstad, Sweden
,
Johan Elf
2   Department of Clinical Sciences, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
,
Peter J. Svensson
2   Department of Clinical Sciences, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
,
Gunnar Engström
2   Department of Clinical Sciences, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
,
Olle Melander
2   Department of Clinical Sciences, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
,
Aris Baras*
3   Regeneron Genetics Center, Tarrytown, New York, United States
,
Luca A Lotta*
3   Regeneron Genetics Center, Tarrytown, New York, United States
,
4   Center for Primary Health Care Research, Lund University and Region Skåne, Malmö, Sweden
,
for the Regeneron Genetics Center › Author Affiliations
Funding This work was supported by a grant awarded to Dr. Bengt Zöller by ALF-funding from Region Skåne, Sparbanken Skåne, and by the Swedish Research Council.
Zoom Image

Abstract

Background The protein C (PC) anticoagulant system has a key role in maintaining hemostatic balance. One missense (Ser219Gly) variant in the PC receptor (PROCR) was associated with venous thromboembolism (VTE) in genome-wide association studies.

Objectives This study aimed to determine the thrombotic risk of rare and common PROCR variants in a large population-based cohort of middle-aged and older adults.

Methods The exonic sequence of PROCR was analyzed for the Ser219Gly variant and other qualifying variants in 28,794 subjects (born 1923–1950, 60% women) without previous VTE, who participated in the Malmö Diet and Cancer study (1991–1996). Incidence of VTE was followed up until 2018. Qualifying variants were defined as loss-of-function or nonbenign (PolyPhen-2) missense variants with minor allele frequencies (MAFs) <0.1%.

Results Re-sequencing identified 36 PROCR variants in the study population (26,210 non-VTE exomes and 2,584 VTE exomes), 11 synonymous, 22 missense, and three loss-of-function variants. Kaplan–Meier analysis of the known Ser219Gly variant (rs867186) showed that homozygosity for this variant increased the risk of disease, whereas heterozygosity showed no effect. Cox multivariate regression analysis revealed an adjusted hazard ratio (HR) of 1.5 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.1–2.0). Fifteen rare variants were classified as qualifying and were included in collapsing analysis (burden test and SKAT-O). They did not contribute to risk. However, a Arg113Cys missense variant (rs146420040; MAF = 0.004) showed an increased VTE risk (HR = 1.3; 95% CI: 1.0–1.9).

Conclusion Homozygosity for the Ser219Gly variant and a previously identified functional PROCR variant (Arg113Cys) was associated with VTE. Other variants did not contribute to VTE.

Author Contributions

E.M., C.H., and B.Z. conceived and designed the study, analyzed and interpreted data, drafted the manuscript, and gave final approval of the submitted manuscript. All authors interpreted data, critically revised the manuscript for important intellectual content, and gave final approval of the submitted manuscript. Whole exome sequencing was performed by the Regeneron Genetics Center (see the Regeneron Genetics Center Banner Author List and Contribution Statements below). E.M., C.H., and B.Z. are the guarantors of this work and, as such, had full access to all the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.


* A list of the Regeneron Genetics Center is provided in the [Supplementary Appendix].




Publication History

Received: 09 September 2021

Accepted: 10 January 2022

Accepted Manuscript online:
12 January 2022

Article published online:
23 February 2022

© 2022. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany