Subscribe to RSS
Please copy the URL and add it into your RSS Feed Reader.
https://www.thieme-connect.de/rss/thieme/en/10.1055-s-00000062.xml
Psychiatr Prax 2022; 49(02): 64-66
DOI: 10.1055/a-1736-4190
DOI: 10.1055/a-1736-4190
Editorial
Soziales Eingebundensein und Gesundheit
Social Integration and Health
Menschen sind soziale Wesen. Die menschliche Entwicklung ist zwingend an den sozialen Kontext gebunden. Die Relevanz sozialen Eingebundenseins wird besonders in der aktuellen COVID-19-Pandemie deutlich. Die notwendigen Maßnahmen des Gesundheitsschutzes, wie z. B. die Einschränkung sozialer Kontakte, führen zu vermehrter Einsamkeit. Wahrscheinlich waren noch nie so viele Menschen in Deutschland einsam. Daten der NAKO-Gesundheitsstudie zeigten auf der Grundlage von über 100 000 Befragten, dass 31,7 % der Deutschen im Mai 2020 einsam waren, insbesondere Frauen und junge Menschen [1].
Publication History
Article published online:
04 March 2022
© 2022. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
-
Literatur
- 1 Berger K, Riedel-Heller S, Pabst A. et al. Einsamkeit während der ersten Welle der SARS-CoV-2-Pandemie – Ergebnisse der NAKO-Gesundheitsstudie. Bundesgesundheitsbl 2021; 64: 1157-1164 DOI: 10.1007/s00103-021-03393-y.
- 2 Peplau LA, Miceli M, Morasch B. Hrsg. Loneliness: A sourcebook of current theory. Research and therapy. New York: Wiley Interscience; 1982
- 3 Hawkley LC, Hughes ME, Waite LJ. et al. From social structural factors to perceptions of relationship quality and loneliness: the Chicago health, aging, and social relations study. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 2008; 63: S375-S384 DOI: 10.1093/geronb/63.6.s375.
- 4 Holt-Lunstad J. Why Social Relationships Are Important for Physical Health: A Systems Approach to Understanding and Modifying Risk and Protection. Annu Rev Psychol 2018; 69: 437-458 DOI: 10.1146/annurev-psych-122216-011902.
- 5 Luhmann M. Einsamkeit – Erkennen, evaluieren und entschlossen entgegentreten. Schriftliche Stellungnahme zur öffentlichen Anhörung am 19.04.2021. https://www.bundestag.de/resource/blob/833358/0924ddceb95ab55db40277813ac84d12/19-13-135b-data.pdf Stand: 15.12.2021
- 6 Luhmann M, Hawkley LC. Age differences in loneliness from late adolescence to oldest old age. Dev Psychol 2016; 52: 943-959 DOI: 10.1037/dev0000117.
- 7 Röhr S, Wittmann F, Engel C. et al. Social factors and the prevalence of social isolation in a population-based adult cohort. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2021; DOI: 10.1007/s00127-021-02174-x.
- 8 Röhr S, Löbner M, Gühne U. et al. Changes in Social Network Size Are Associated With Cognitive Changes in the Oldest-Old. Front Psychiatry 2020; 11 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00330.
- 9 Holt-Lunstad J, Smith TB, Baker M. et al. Loneliness and social isolation as risk factors for mortality: a meta-analytic review. Perspect Psychol Sci 2015; 10: 227-237 DOI: 10.1177/1745691614568352.
- 10 Park C, Majeed A, Gill H. et al. The Effect of Loneliness on Distinct Health Outcomes: A Comprehensive Review and Meta-Analysis. Psychiatry Res 2020; 294: 113514 DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113514.
- 11 Valtorta NK, Kanaan M, Gilbody S. et al. Loneliness and social isolation as risk factors for coronary heart disease and stroke: systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal observational studies. Heart 2016; 102: 1009-1016 DOI: 10.1136/heartjnl-2015-308790.
- 12 McClelland H, Evans JJ, Nowland R. et al. Loneliness as a predictor of suicidal ideation and behaviour: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies. J Affect Disord 2020; 274: 880-896 DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.05.004.
- 13 van As BAL, Imbimbo E, Franceschi A. et al. The longitudinal association between loneliness and depressive symptoms in the elderly: a systematic review. Int Psychogeriatr 2021; 1-13 DOI: 10.1017/S1041610221000399.
- 14 Lara E, Martín-María N, de La Torre-Luque A. et al. Does loneliness contribute to mild cognitive impairment and dementia? A systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Ageing Res Rev 2019; 52: 7-16 DOI: 10.1016/j.arr.2019.03.002.
- 15 Rodriguez FS, Pabst A, Luck T. et al. Social Network Types in Old Age and Incident Dementia. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol 2018; 31: 163-170 DOI: 10.1177/0891988718781041.
- 16 Lam JA, Murray ER, Yu KE. et al. Neurobiology of loneliness: a systematic review. Neuropsychopharmacology 2021; 46: 1873-1887 DOI: 10.1038/s41386-021-01058-7.
- 17 Masi CM, Chen H-Y, Hawkley LC. et al. A meta-analysis of interventions to reduce loneliness. Pers Soc Psychol Rev 2011; 15: 219-266 DOI: 10.1177/1088868310377394.
- 18 Veronese N, Galvano D, D’Antiga F. et al. Interventions for reducing loneliness: An umbrella review of intervention studies. Health Soc Care Community 2021; 29: e89-e96 DOI: 10.1111/hsc.13248.
- 19 Hickin N, Käll A, Shafran R. et al. The effectiveness of psychological interventions for loneliness: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Psychol Rev 2021; 88: 102066 DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2021.102066.
- 20 Mann F, Bone JK, Lloyd-Evans B. et al. A life less lonely: the state of the art in interventions to reduce loneliness in people with mental health problems. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2017; 52: 627-638 DOI: 10.1007/s00127-017-1392-y.
- 21 Priebe S, Chevalier A, Hamborg T. et al. Effectiveness of a volunteer befriending programme for patients with schizophrenia: randomised controlled trial. Br J Psychiatry 2020; 217: 477-483 DOI: 10.1192/bjp.2019.42.
- 22 Röhr S, Müller F, Jung F. et al. Psychosoziale Folgen von Quarantänemaßnahmen bei schwerwiegenden Coronavirus-Ausbrüchen: ein Rapid Review. Psychiat Prax 2020; 47: 179-189 DOI: 10.1055/a-1159-5562.