Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/a-1710-3529
Acquisition of a Dose Management System with Consideration of Medico-Legal and Economic Aspects
Article in several languages: English | deutsch
Abstract
Background New radiation protection regulation encompassing additional obligations for monitoring, reporting and recording of radiation exposure, was enacted on December 31, 2018. As a consequence, dose management systems (DMS) are necessary to fulfill the requirements. The process of selection, acquisition and implementation of a suitable IT solution for this purpose is a challenge that all X-ray-applying facilities, including hospitals and private practices, are currently facing.
Method A target/actual-analysis as well as a cost-utility analysis is presented for this specific case as a foundation for the acquisition decision-making process.
Result An actual analysis is necessary in order to record the current status of dose documentation. An interdivisional approach is recommended to include all imaging modalities and devices. An interdisciplinary steering committee can be helpful in enabling consensus and rapid action. A target analysis includes additional criteria with respect to ease of operation, technical feasibility, process optimization and research opportunities to consider in addition to the statutory requirements. By means of a cost-benefit analysis, considerations between costs and the individually weighted advantages and disadvantages of eligible DMS result in a ranking of preference for the available solutions.
Conclusion Requirements of a DMS can be summarized in a specification sheet. Deploying an actual condition analysis, target state analysis and cost-utility analysis can help to identify a suitable DMS to achieve rapid commissioning and highest possible user acceptance while optimizing costs at the same time.
Key Points:
-
An actual analysis reveals optimization and standardization needs in examination protocols and technical coding of dose data that can be addressed before or during the acquisition process.
-
A specification sheet covers all functional, technical, and financial aspects of a target analysis.
-
A cost-utility analysis is useful for exploring an appropriate dose management system with high user acceptance, rapid implementation, and low cost.
-
An interdisciplinary steering committee can be helpful to enable early consensus building and fast action.
Citation Format
-
Do TD, Melzig C, Kauczor H et al. Acquisition of a Dose Management System with Consideration of Medico-Legal and Economic Aspects. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2022; 194: 363 – 372
Publication History
Received: 25 May 2021
Accepted: 07 November 2021
Article published online:
21 December 2021
© 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
-
References
- 1 Council of the European Union. Richtlinie 2013/59/EURATOM, Amtsblatt Der Eur. Union. L 13/1 (2014) 1–73. https://www.uni-kiel.de/strahlenschutz-seminar/eubss.pdf %0Ahttp://www.bmub.bund.de/themen/atomenergie-strahlenschutz/strahlenschutz/rechtsvorschriften-technische-regeln/regelungen-der-eu. [Accessed 08.10.2020].
- 2 Bundesministerium der Justiz und für Verbraucherschutz. Gesetz zum Schutz vor der schädlichen Wirkung ionisierender Strahlung (Strahlenschutzgesetz – StrlSchG), StrlSchG. (2017) 1–123. https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/strlschg/StrlSchG.pdf . [Accessed 05.11.2020].
- 3 Walz M, Wucherer M, Loose R. Was bringt die neue Srahlenschutzverordnung?. Radiologe 2019; 59: 457-466
- 4 Statista: Statistics and Market data on Software. https://www.statista.com/markets/418/topic/484/software . [Accessed October 12, 2020].
- 5 Teich I, Kolbenschlag W, Reiners W. Der richtige Weg zur Softwareauswahl: Lastenheft, Pflichtenheft, Compliance, Erfolgskontrolle. Springer-Verlag; 2008
- 6 Dannis, CHAOS Report 2015, Standish Gr. Int. Inc. (2015) 13. https://www.standishgroup.com/sample_research_files/CHAOSReport2015-Final.pdf . [Accessed 28.11.2020].
- 7 Stamm G, Rübel HW. Procurement strategy for a dose management system. Radiologe 2021;
- 8 Boos AJ, Meineke A, Bethge OT. et al. Dose Monitoring in Radiology Departments: Status Quo and Future Perspectives. Fortschr. Röntgenstr 2016;
- 9 National Electrical Manufacturers Association. Digital imaging and communications in medicine, ISO 12052:2017(en), Health informatics – Digital imaging and communication in medicine (DICOM) including workflow and data management. https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:12052:ed-2:v1:en . [Accessed 30.11.2020].
- 10 European Society of Radiology. EuroSafe Imaging Stars. http://www.eurosafeimaging.org/stars . [Accessed 01.03.2021].
- 11 Bundesamt für Strahlenschutz. Bekanntmachung der aktualisierten diagnostischen Referenzwerte für diagnostische und interventionelle Röntgenuntersuchungen, 22 (2016). [Accessed 01.02.2021]
- 12 Damilakis J, Frija G. EUCLID project carries out study to establish clinical DRLs for Europe, in: 28.02.2019, 2019. http://www.eurosafeimaging.org/wp/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/ECR-Today-2019_Thursday_Feb-28_EUCLID.pdf . [Accessed December 8, 2020].
- 13 Wöhe G, Döring U, Brösel G. Einführung in die allgemeine Betriebswirtschaftslehre: Produktionsplanung. München: Vahlen; 2016: 328-331
- 14 American Association of Physicists in Medicine. The Report of AAPM Task Group 204. Size-specific Dose Estimates (SSDE) in Pediatric and Adult Body CT examinations. https://www.aapm.org/pubs/reports/RPT_204.pdf . [Accessed 30.12.2020].
- 15 Couhan PK, Yao hF, Yerima S. et al. Software as a Service: Analyzing Security Issues, 2015. arXiv preprint arXiv:1505.01711.
- 16 Bork U, Weitz J. Cloud Computing im Gesundheitswesen: Mehr Chancen als Risiken. Dtsch Arztebl 2019; 116: 679-685
- 17 Schöffski O, Glaser P, vd Schulenburg J. Gesundheitsökonomische Evaluationen. Berlin: Springer; 2013: 71-110
- 18 Schlüchtermann J. Betriebswirtschaft und Management im Krankenhaus: Integration nicht-monetärer Kriterien mithilfe der Nutzwertanalyse. Berlin: Medizinisch Wissenschaftliche Vertragsgesellschaft; 2015: 283-287
- 19 Eisenführ F, Weber M, Langer T. Rationales Entscheiden (Entscheiden). Berlin: Springer; 2010
- 20 Zangemeister C. Nutzwertanalyse in der Systemtechnik. München: 1976
- 21 Vergabeportal. Bewertungskriterien und -matrizen im Vergabeverfahren: Interpolationsmethoden. https://www.reguvis.de/xaver/vergabeportal/start.xav?start=%2F%2F*%5B%40attr_id%3D%27vergabeportal_8223873931%27 and %40outline_id%3D%27vergabeportal_BewertungskriterienMatrizen_8221329931%27%5D. [Accessed 01.03.2021].