Visualized Urethral Mobility Profile During Urine Leakage in Supine and Standing Positions

Abstract

Objectives To describe the urethral course and position during urine leakage based on the visualized urethral mobility profile (UMP) and to explore the differences between supine and standing positions.

Method This was a prospective study of 100 women with SUI and 100 control women who underwent a cough stress test (CST) with transperineal ultrasound (TPUS) in supine and standing positions. In the mid-sagittal plane, the UMP software automatically placed six equidistant points from the bladder neck (point 1) to the external urethral meatus (point 6). It determined the x and y coordinates of the points relative to the symphysis pubis. The distance between the points and symphysis pubis (dist. 1 to 6) was calculated using the formula SQRT (x2 + y2). The visualized UMP was created by reproducing the six points on a bitmap.

Results Valid UMP data of 78 control women and 90 women with SUI were analyzed. In the two positions, distances 1 to 6 were significantly greater in the SUI group than the continent group (all p < 0.05). During Valsalva, the distance between the mid-urethra (dist. 3 and 4) and the symphysis was significantly increased (all p < 0.001) in the SUI group. The visualized UMP showed a similar upper-urethral course in the two groups. The gap between the mid-urethra (points 3 and 4) and symphysis was wider in the SUI group.

Conclusion The visualized UMP in supine and standing positions showed no difference in the bladder neck and upper urethral stability between incontinent and continent women, but mid-urethral stability was weaker in SUI.

Zusammenfassung

Ziel Beschreibung des Verlaufs und der Position der Harnröhre während des Harnverlusts anhand des visualisierten urethralen Mobilitätsprofils (UMP) und Untersuchung der Unterschiede zwischen Rückenlage und stehender Position.

Methode Es handelte sich um eine prospektive Studie mit 100 Frauen mit Stress-Harninkontinenz (SUI) und 100 Kontrollfrauen, die sich einem Husten-Stress-Test (HST) mit transperinealem Ultraschall (TPUS) in Rückenlage und im Stehen unterzogen. In der mittleren Sagittalebene platzierte die UMP-Software automatisch 6 äquidistante Punkte vom Blasenhals (Punkt 1) bis zum Meatus urethrae externus (Punkt 6). Sie bestimmte die x- und y-Koordinaten der Punkte relativ zur Symphysis pubica. Die Distanz zwischen den Punkten und der Symphysis pubica (Dist. 1 bis 6) wurde mit der Formel SQRT (x² + y²) berechnet. Das visualisierte UMP wurde durch die Wiedergabe der 6 Punkte auf einer Bitmap erstellt.

Ergebnisse Die validen UMP-Daten von 78 Kontrollfrauen und 90 Frauen mit SUI wurden analysiert. In den beiden Positionen waren die Distanzen 1 bis 6 in der SUI-Gruppe signifikant größer als in der Gruppe mit Kontinenz (alle p<0,05). Während des Valsalva-Manövers war der Abstand zwischen der mittleren Urethra (Dist. 3 und 4) und der Symphysis in der SUI-Gruppe signifikant vergrößert (alle p<0,001). Das visualisierte UMP zeigte in beiden Gruppen einen ähnlichen Verlauf der oberen Harnröhre. Die Distanz zwischen der mittleren Harnröhre (Punkte 3 und 4) und der Symphysis war in der SUI-Gruppe größer.

Schlussfolgerung Das visualisierte UMP in Rückenlage und im Stehen zeigte keinen Unterschied hinsichtlich der Stabilität des Blasenhalses und der oberen Harnröhre zwischen inkontinenten und kontinenten Frauen, aber bei SUI war die Stabilität der mittleren Harnröhre geringer.

Keywords

Urinary tract - Stress urinary incontinence - Pelvic floor ultrasound - Urethral mobility profile

Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 02. Februar 2021

Angenommen nach Revision: 02. November 2021

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
15. Februar 2022

• References

• 1 Rubilotta E, Balzarro M, DʼAmico A. et al. Pure stress urinary incontinence: analysis of prevalence, estimation of costs, and financial impact. BMC Urol 2019; 19: 44
• 2 Zhu L, Li L, Lang JH. et al. Prevalence and risk factors for peri- and postpartum urinary incontinence in primiparous women in China: a prospective longitudinal study. Int Urogynecol J 2012; 23: 563-572
• 3 Wen L, Zhao B, Chen W. et al. Real-time assessment of the behaviour of the bladder neck and proximal urethra during urine leaking in the cough stress test (CST) in supine and standing positions using transperineal ultrasound. Int Urogynecol J 2020; 31: 1451-1456
• 4 Naranjo-Ortiz C, Shek KL, Martin AJ. et al. What is normal bladder neck anatomy?. Int Urogynecol J 2016; 27: 945-950
• 5 Ling C, Shek KL, Gillor M. et al. Is urethral kinking a confounder of the association between urethral closure pressure and stress urinary incontinence?. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2021; 57: 488-492
• 6 Shek KL, Dietz HP. The urethral motion profile: a novel method to evaluate urethral support and mobility. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2008; 48: 337-342
• 7 Pirpiris A, Shek KL, Dietz HP. Urethral mobility and urinary incontinence. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2010; 36: 507-511
• 8 DeLancey JO, Trowbridge ER, Miller JM. et al. Stress urinary incontinence: relative importance of urethral support and urethral closure pressure. J Urol 2008; 179: 2286-2290
• 9 Dietz HP, Nazemian K, Shek KL. et al. Can urodynamic stress incontinence be diagnosed by ultrasound?. Int Urogynecol J 2013; 24: 1399-1403
• 10 Xiao T, Chen Y, Gan Y. et al. Can Stress Urinary Incontinence Be Predicted by Ultrasound?. Am J Roentgenol 2019; 213: 1163-1169
• 11 Shi Q, Wen L, Zhao B. et al. The Association of Hiatal Dimensions and Urethral Mobility with Stress Urinary Incontinence. J Ultrasound Med 2021;
• 12 Guralnick ML, Fritel X, Tarcan T. et al. ICS Educational Module: Cough stress test in the evaluation of female urinary incontinence: Introducing the ICS-Uniform Cough Stress Test. Neurourol Urodyn 2018; 37: 1849-1855
• 13 Henderson JW, Kane SM, Mangel JM. et al. A Randomized Comparative Study Evaluating Various Cough Stress Tests and 24-Hour Pad Test with Urodynamics. J Urol 2018; 199: 1557-1564
• 14 Kim SO, Jung HS, Jang WS. et al. Measurement of the Q-tip angle before and after tension-free vaginal tape-obturator (TVT-O): preoperative urethral mobility may predict surgical outcome. Int Urogynecol J 2013; 24: 1005-1009
• 15 Wen L, Shek KL, Dietz HP. Changes in urethral mobility and configuration after prolapse repair. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2019; 53: 124-128
• 16 Wen L, Shek KL, Subramaniam N. et al. Correlations between Sonographic and Urodynamic Findings after Mid Urethral Sling Surgery. J Urol 2018; 199: 1571-1576
• 17 Mouritsen L, Rasmussen A. Bladder neck mobility evaluated by vaginal ultrasonography. Br J Urol 1993; 71: 166-171
• 18 Dietz HP, Clarke B. The urethral pressure profile and ultrasound imaging of the lower urinary tract. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2001; 12: 38-41
• 19 Jamard E, Blouet M, Thubert T. et al. Utility of 2D-ultrasound in pelvic floor muscle contraction and bladder neck mobility assessment in women with urinary incontinence. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod 2020; 49: 101629
• 20 Petros PE. The pubourethral ligaments – an anatomical and histological study in the live patient. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 1998; 9: 154-157
• 21 Vazzoler N, Soulié M, Escourrou G. et al. Pubourethral ligaments in women: anatomical and clinical aspects. Surg Radiol Anat 2002; 24: 33-37
• 22 Macura KJ, Thompson RE, Bluemke DA. et al. Magnetic resonance imaging in assessment of stress urinary incontinence in women: Parameters differentiating urethral hypermobility and intrinsic sphincter deficiency. World J Radiol 2015; 7: 394-404
• 23 Macura KJ, Genadry RR, Bluemke DA. MR imaging of the female urethra and supporting ligaments in assessment of urinary incontinence: spectrum of abnormalities. Radiographics 2006; 26: 1135-1149
• 24 Surabhi VR, Menias CO, George V. et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of female urethral and periurethral disorders. Radiol Clin North Am 2013; 51: 941-953
• 25 Huang WC, Yang JM. Bladder neck funneling on ultrasound cystourethrography in primary stress urinary incontinence: a sign associated with urethral hypermobility and intrinsic sphincter deficiency. Urology 2003; 61: 936-941