Download PDF
TumorDiagnostik & Therapie 2022; 43(02): 96-103
DOI: 10.1055/a-1689-6178
Übersicht
Schwerpunkt

Behandlung des Magenkarzinoms – Stadienadaptierte chirurgische Therapie und minimal-invasive Operationsverfahren

Ulrich Ronellenfitsch
,
Jessica Döbereiner
,
Jörg Kleeff
› Further Information
Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Das Magenkarzinom stellt eine der häufigsten Tumorentitäten in Deutschland und weltweit dar. Die Therapie in kurativer Intention ist stadienadaptiert und basiert auf der kompletten Entfernung des Primärtumors sowie in den meisten Tumorstadien einer radikalen D2-Lymphadenektomie. Bei fortgeschrittenen Tumorstadien wird zusätzlich eine perioperative Chemotherapie empfohlen, da sie das Gesamtüberleben verlängert. Dieser Beitrag gibt einen Überblick über die für das jeweilige Tumorstadium empfohlene Therapie sowie die aktuelle Evidenz zu laparoskopischen und robotischen Therapieverfahren.

Publication History

Article published online:
02 March 2022

© 2022. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Hermann S, Jansen L, Barnes B. et al. Epidemiologie des Magenkarzinoms in Deutschland. Der Onkologe 2020; 26 (10) 887-897
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Kitano S, Iso Y, Moriyama M. et al. Laparoscopy-assisted Billroth I gastrectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1994; 4 (02) 146-148
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Mönig S, Ott K, Gockel I. et al. S3-Leitlinie Magenkarzinom – Diagnostik und Therapie der Adenokarzinome des Magens und ösophagogastralen Übergangs. Der Chirurg 2020; 91 (01) 37-40
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Brierley J, Gospodarowicz MK, Wittekind C. TNM classification of malignant tumours. UICC; 2017
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Probst A, Pagitz M, Messmann H. et al. Endoskopische Resektionsverfahren EMR und ESD – Schritt für Schritt. Gastroenterologie up2date 2018; 14 (04) 309-319
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Tao M, Zhou X, Hu M. et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection versus endoscopic mucosal resection for patients with early gastric cancer: a meta-analysis. BMJ Open 2019; 9 (12) e025803
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Ronellenfitsch U, Lippert C, Grobholz R. et al. Histology-based prediction of lymph node metastases in early gastric cancer as decision guidance for endoscopic resection. Oncotarget 2016; 7 (09) 10676-10683
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Coburn N, Cosby R, Klein L. et al. Staging and surgical approaches in gastric cancer: A systematic review. Cancer Treat Rev 2018; 63: 104-115
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Ronellenfitsch U, Schwarzbach M, Hofheinz R. et al. Preoperative chemo(radio)therapy versus primary surgery for gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma: systematic review with meta-analysis combining individual patient and aggregate data. Eur J Cancer 2013; 49 (15) 3149-3158
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Raziee HR, Cardoso R, Seevaratnam R. et al. Systematic review of the predictors of positive margins in gastric cancer surgery and the effect on survival. Gastric Cancer 2012; 15 (Suppl. 01) S116-S124
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Spicer J, Benay C, Lee L. et al. Diagnostic accuracy and utility of intraoperative microscopic margin analysis of gastric and esophageal adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 2014; 21 (08) 2580-2586
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Songun I, Putter H, Kranenbarg EM. et al. Surgical treatment of gastric cancer: 15-year follow-up results of the randomised nationwide Dutch D1D2 trial. Lancet Oncol 2010; 11 (05) 439-449
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Seevaratnam R, Bocicariu A, Cardoso R. et al. How many lymph nodes should be assessed in patients with gastric cancer? A systematic review. Gastric Cancer 2012; 15 (Suppl. 01) S70-S88
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 Kunisaki C, Sato S, Tsuchiya N. et al. Systemic Review and Meta-analysis of Impact of Splenectomy for Advanced Gastric Cancer. In Vivo 2020; 34 (06) 3115-3125
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Marano L, Rondelli F, Bartoli A. et al. Oncologic Effectiveness and Safety of Splenectomy in Total Gastrectomy for Proximal Gastric Carcinoma: Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Anticancer Res 2018; 38 (06) 3609-3617
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 Yamamoto M, Baba H, Kakeji Y. et al. Postoperative morbidity/mortality and survival rates after total gastrectomy, with splenectomy/pancreaticosplenectomy for patients with advanced gastric cancer. Hepatogastroenterology 2004; 51 (55) 298-302
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Aversa JG, Diggs LP, Hagerty BL. et al. Multivisceral Resection for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer. J Gastrointest Surg 2021; 25 (03) 609-622
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 Pacelli F, Cusumano G, Rosa F. et al. Multivisceral resection for locally advanced gastric cancer: an Italian multicenter observational study. JAMA Surg 2013; 148 (04) 353-360
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 Kosuga T, Tsujiura M, Nakashima S. et al. Current status of function-preserving gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Ann Gastroenterol Surg 2021; 5 (03) 278-286
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 Ronellenfitsch U, Najmeh S, Andalib A. et al. Functional outcomes and quality of life after proximal gastrectomy with esophagogastrostomy using a narrow gastric conduit. Ann Surg Oncol 2015; 22 (03) 772-779
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 Nunobe S, Ida S. Current status of proximal gastrectomy for gastric and esophagogastric junctional cancer: A review. Ann Gastroenterol Surg 2020; 4 (05) 498-504
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 22 Aurello P, Magistri P, Nigri G. et al. Surgical management of microscopic positive resection margin after gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a systematic review of gastric R1 management. Anticancer Res 2014; 34 (11) 6283-6288
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 23 Bissolati M, Desio M, Rosa F. et al. Risk factor analysis for involvement of resection margins in gastric and esophagogastric junction cancer: an Italian multicenter study. Gastric Cancer 2017; 20 (01) 70-82
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 24 Henning GT, Schild SE, Stafford SL. et al. Results of irradiation or chemoirradiation for primary unresectable, locally recurrent, or grossly incomplete resection of gastric adenocarcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2000; 46 (01) 109-118
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 25 Stiekema J, Trip AK, Jansen EP. et al. The prognostic significance of an R1 resection in gastric cancer patients treated with adjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Ann Surg Oncol 2014; 21 (04) 1107-1114
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 26 Weber MC, Berlet M, Novotny A. et al. Reconstruction following gastrectomy. Chirurg 2021; 92 (06) 506-514
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 27 Syn NL, Wee I, Shabbir A. et al. Pouch Versus No Pouch Following Total Gastrectomy: Meta-analysis of Randomized and Non-randomized Studies. Ann Surg 2019; 269 (06) 1041-1053
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 28 Gertsen EC, Brenkman HJF, Haverkamp L. et al. Worldwide Practice in Gastric Cancer Surgery: A 6-Year Update. Dig Surg 2021; 38 (04) 266-274
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 29 Caruso S, Patriti A, Roviello F. et al. Laparoscopic and robot-assisted gastrectomy for gastric cancer: Current considerations. World J Gastroenterol 2016; 22 (25) 5694-5717
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 30 Hashizume M, Sugimachi K. Robot-assisted gastric surgery. Surg Clin North Am 2003; 83 (06) 1429-1444
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 31 Kakeji Y, Konishi K, Ieiri S. et al. Robotic laparoscopic distal gastrectomy: a comparison of the da Vinci and Zeus systems. Int J Med Robot 2006; 2 (04) 299-304
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 32 Tsai SH, Liu CA, Huang KH. et al. Advances in Laparoscopic and Robotic Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer. Pathol Oncol Res 2017; 23 (01) 13-17
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 33 Huscher CG, Mingoli A, Sgarzini G. et al. Laparoscopic versus open subtotal gastrectomy for distal gastric cancer: five-year results of a randomized prospective trial. Ann Surg 2005; 241 (02) 232-237
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 34 Kim HH, Han SU, Kim MC. et al. Effect of Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy vs Open Distal Gastrectomy on Long-term Survival Among Patients With Stage I Gastric Cancer: The KLASS-01 Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Oncol 2019; 5 (04) 506-513
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 35 Hyung WJ, Yang HK, Park YK. et al. Long-Term Outcomes of Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer: The KLASS-02-RCT Randomized Clinical Trial. J Clin Oncol 2020; 38 (28) 3304-3313
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 36 Katai H, Mizusawa J, Katayama H. et al. Survival outcomes after laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy versus open distal gastrectomy with nodal dissection for clinical stage IA or IB gastric cancer (JCOG0912): a multicentre, non-inferiority, phase 3 randomised controlled trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2020; 5 (02) 142-151
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 37 Yu J, Huang C, Sun Y. et al. Effect of Laparoscopic vs Open Distal Gastrectomy on 3-Year Disease-Free Survival in Patients With Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer: The CLASS-01 Randomized Clinical Trial. Jama 2019; 321 (20) 1983-1992
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 38 Liu F, Huang C, Xu Z. et al. Morbidity and Mortality of Laparoscopic vs Open Total Gastrectomy for Clinical Stage I Gastric Cancer: The CLASS02 Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Oncol 2020; 6 (10) 1590-1597
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 39 van der Veen A, Brenkman HJF, Seesing MFJ. et al. Laparoscopic Versus Open Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer (LOGICA): A Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial. J Clin Oncol 2021; 39 (09) 978-989
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 40 Liao G, Wang Z, Li H. et al. Learning curve and short-term outcomes of modularized LADG for advanced gastric cancer: A retrospective study. Medicine (Baltimore) 2019; 98 (10) e14670
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 41 NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: Gastric Cancer – Version 5.2021. 2021
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 42 Pan HF, Wang G, Liu J. et al. Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Gastrectomy for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2017; 27 (06) 428-433
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 43 Lu J, Zheng CH, Xu BB. et al. Assessment of Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Ann Surg 2021; 273 (05) 858-867
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 44 Li ZY, Zhao YL, Qian F. et al. Long-term oncologic outcomes of robotic versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for locally advanced gastric cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis of 1170 patients. Surg Endosc 2021;
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 45 Shin HJ, Son SY, Wang B. et al. Long-term Comparison of Robotic and Laparoscopic Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: A Propensity Score-weighted Analysis of 2084 Consecutive Patients. Ann Surg 2021; 274 (01) 128-137
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 46 Kim MS, Kim WJ, Hyung WJ. et al. Comprehensive Learning Curve of Robotic Surgery: Discovery From a Multicenter Prospective Trial of Robotic Gastrectomy. Ann Surg 2021; 273 (05) 949-956
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar