Handling of Incidents in the Clinical Application of Ionizing Radiation in Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology – a Multi-center Study

Abstract

Purpose According to the German legislation and regulation of radiation protection, i. e. Strahlenschutzgesetz und Strahlenschutzverordnung (StrlSchG and StrlSchV), which came into force on 31^st December 2018, significant unintended or accidential exposures have to be reported to the competent authority. Furthermore, facilities have to implement measures to prevent and to recognize unintended or accidental exposures as well as to reduce their consequences. We developed a process to register incidents and tested its application in the framework of a multi-center-study.

Materials and Methods Over a period of 12 months, 16 institutions for x-ray diagnostics and interventions, documented their incidents. Documentation of the incidents was conducted using the software CIRSrad, which was developed, released for testing purposes and implemented in the frame of the study. Reporting criteria of the project were selected to be more sensitive compared to the legal criteria specifying “significant incidents”. Reported incidents were evaluated after four, eight, and twelve months. Finally, all participating institutions were interviewed on their experience with the software and the correlated effort.

Results The rate of reported incidents varied between institutions as well as between modalities. The majority of incidents were reported in conventional x-ray imaging, followed by computed tomography and therapeutic interventions. Incidents were attributed to several different causes, amongst others to the technical setup and patient positioning (19 %) and patient movement or insufficient cooperativeness of the patient (18 %). Most incidents were below corresponding thresholds stated in StrlSchV. The workload for documenting the incidents was rated as appropriate.

Conclusion It is possible to monitor and handle incidents complient with legal requirements with an acceptable effort. The number of reported incidents can be increased by frequent trainings on the detection and the processing workflow, on the software and legal regulation as well as by a transparent error handling within the institution.

Key Points: 

• The software CIRSrad was developed to enable the present study and as prototype platform for a future radiological incident management system.

• 586 exceedances of thresholds were recorded by 16 facilities in a period of one year.

• Frequent trainings of all users increase the number of reported cases.

Citation Format

• Müller BS, Singer J, Stamm G et al. Handling of Incidents in the Clinical Application of Ionizing Radiation in Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology – a Multi-center Study. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2022; 194: 400 – 408

Key words

diagnostic radiology - QA/QC - radiation safety - CIRS - incidents - notification criteria

Publication History

Received: 28 March 2021

Accepted: 30 September 2021

Article published online:
21 December 2021

• References

• 1 Brix G, Griebel J, Czarwinski R. Reporting and information system for significant events related to radiation exposures in medicine: Structure, responsibilities and reporting criteria. Z Med Phys 2019; 29: 66-76 DOI: 10.1016/j.zemedi.2018.11.003.
• 2 Clark BG, Brown RJ, Ploquin JL. et al. The management of radiation treatment error through incident learning. Radiother Oncol 2010; 95: 344-349 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2010.03.022.
• 3 Kearney N, Denham G. Recommendations for Nuclear Medicine Technologists Drawn from an Analysis of Errors Reported in Australian Radiation Incident Registers. J Nucl Med Technol 2016; 44: 243-247 DOI: 10.2967/jnmt.116.178517.
• 4 Williams MV. Radiotherapy near misses, incidents and errors: radiotherapy incident at Glasgow. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2007; 19: 1-3 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2006.12.004.
• 5 Boadu M, Rehani MM. Unintended exposure in radiotherapy: identification of prominent causes. Radiother Oncol 2009; 93: 609-617 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2009.08.044.
• 6 Bissonnette JP, Medlam G. Trend analysis of radiation therapy incidents over seven years. Radiother Oncol 2010; 96: 139-144 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2010.05.002.
• 7 Cunningham J, Coffey M, Knoos T. et al. Radiation Oncology Safety Information System (ROSIS) – profiles of participants and the first 1074 incident reports. Radiother Oncol 2010; 97: 601-607 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2010.10.023.
• 8 Smith KS, Harris KM, Potters L. et al. Physician attitudes and practices related to voluntary error and near-miss reporting. J Oncol Pract 2014; 10: 350-357 DOI: 10.1200/jop.2013.001353.
• 9 Montgomery L, Fava P, Freeman CR. et al. Development and implementation of a radiation therapy incident learning system compatible with local workflow and a national taxonomy. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2018; 19: 259-270 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.12218.
• 10 Martin CJ. A survey of incidents in radiology and nuclear medicine in the West of Scotland. Br J Radiol 2005; DOI: 10.1259/bjr/20111483.
• 11 Martin CJ, Vassileva J, Vano E. et al. Unintended and accidental medical radiation exposures in radiology: guidelines on investigation and prevention. J Radiol Prot 2017; 37: 883-906 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6498/aa881e.
• 12 IAEA. SAFRAD – Safety in Radiological Procedures. Im Internet (Stand: 13.07.2020): https://www.iaea.org/resources/rpop/resources/databases-and-learning-systems/safrad
• 13 Kruskal JB, Siewert B, Anderson SW. et al. Managing an acute adverse event in a radiology department. Radiographics 2008; 28: 1237-1250 DOI: 10.1148/rg.285085064.
• 14 Stecker MS, Balter S, Towbin RB. et al. Guidelines for patient radiation dose management. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2009; 20: 263-273 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2009.04.037.
• 15 Steele JR, Jones AK, Ninan EP. Quality initiatives: Establishing an interventional radiology patient radiation safety program. Radiographics 2012; 32: 277-287 DOI: 10.1148/rg.321115002.
• 16 Sendlhofer G, Leitgeb K, Kober B. et al. The evolution of the Critical Incident Reporting System in an Austrian university hospital. Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes 2016; 114: 48-57 DOI: 10.1016/j.zefq.2016.06.005.
• 17 Hoffmann B, Beyer M, Rohe J. et al. “Every error counts”: a web-based incident reporting and learning system for general practice. Qual Saf Health Care 2008; 17: 307-312 DOI: 10.1136/qshc.2006.018440.
• 18 Institut für Allgemeinmedizin, Frankfurt. Fehlerberichts- und Lernsystem für Hausarztpraxen; Jeder Fehler zählt!. Im Internet (Stand: 13.07.2020): https://www.jeder-fehler-zaehlt.de/
• 19 BÄK, KVB. Ärztliches Zentrum für Qualität in der Medizin. Krankenhaus-CIRS-Netz Deutschland 2.0. Im Internet (Stand: 13.07.2020): https://www.kh-cirs.de/
• 20 Hartmann J, Müller B, Singer J. et al Betrieblicher Umgang mit (bedeutsamen) Vorkommnissen bei medizinischen Anwendungen ionisierender Strahlung in der Röntgendiagnostik und interventionellen Radiologie und praktische Erprobung der Meldekriterien – Vorhaben 3617S42333 (04.01.2021). http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0221-2021010624660 , Stand: 28.02.2021
• 21 Borowski M, Pirl L, Hartmann J. et al Betrieblicher Umgang mit (bedeutsamen) Vorkommnissen bei medizinischen Anwendungen radioaktiver Stoffe in der Nuklearmedizin und praktische Erprobung der Meldekriterien – Vorhaben 3617S42332 (04.01.2021). http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0221-2021010624652 , Stand: 28.02.2021
• 22 Pirl L, Borowski M, Hertlein T. et al CIRSrad – Critical Incident Reporting System for Radiology and Nuclear Medicine. https://www.apt.drg.de/de-DE/5979/cirsrad/ , Stand: 28.02.2021
• 23 Borowski M, Hartmann J, Müller B. et al Leitfaden zum Umgang mit Vorkommnissen in Röntgendiagnostik und Nuklearmedizin – Vorhaben 3617S42332 und 3617S42333 (04.01.2021). http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0221-2021010624674 , Stand: 28.02.2021
• 24 Oechler LS. Analyse von Fehlaufnahmen bei Röntgenuntersuchungen: Technische Hochschule Mittelhessen, Campus Gießen. 2019
• 25 Heinrich HW. Industrial accident prevention: a scientific approach. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1931
• 26 Hartmann J, Singer J, Fiebich M. et al Bewertung des Einsatzes von Dosismanagementsystemen zur Optimierung von Röntgenanwendungen und Einhaltung von Referenzwerten – Vorhaben 3616S42432 (04.01.2021). http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0221-2021010424630 , Stand: 21.03.2021
• 27 Hartmann J, Singer J, Fiebich M. et al Leitfaden zum Einsatz von Dosismanagementsystemen zur Optimierung von Röntgenanwendungen und Einhaltung von Referenzwerten – Vorhaben 3616S42432 (04.01.2021). http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0221-2021010424644 , Stand: 21.03.2021
• 28 Loose RW, Vano E, Mildenberger P. et al. Radiation dose management systems-requirements and recommendations for users from the ESR EuroSafe Imaging initiative. Eur Radiol 2021; 31: 2106-2114 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-020-07290-x.