Implantatversagen nach Instrumentierungen bei Osteoporose: Ursachen und Behandlungskonzepte

Zusammenfassung

Die Osteoporose stellt eine der grössten Herausforderungen in der instrumentierten Wirbelsäulenchirurgie dar. Verschiedene prä-, intra- und postoperative Ansätze können verfolgt werden um die Komplikationsrate zu verringern. Die verschiedenen Ansätze werden in diesem Artikel beleuchtet.

Abstract

Osteoporosis is one of the biggest challenges for instrumented spinal surgery. Different pre-, intra- and postoperative approaches can be used to reduce the complication rate. The different approaches are highlighted in this manuscript.

Schlüsselwörter

Instrumentierung - Osteoporose - Implantatversagen - Biomechanik

Keywords

spinal instrumentation - osteoporosis - implant failure - biomechanics

Publication History

Article published online:
17 May 2022

• Literatur

• 1 Weiser L, Huber G, Sellenschloh K. et al. Insufficient stability of pedicle screws in osteoporotic vertebrae: biomechanical correlation of bone mineral density and pedicle screw fixation strength. Eur Spine J 2017; 26: 2891-2897 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-017-5091-x. (PMID: 28391382)
• 2 Bjerke BT, Zarrabian M, Aleem IS. et al. Incidence of Osteoporosis-Related Complications Following Posterior Lumbar Fusion. Global Spine J 2018; 8: 563-569 DOI: 10.1177/2192568217743727. (PMID: 30202709)
• 3 Schuit SC, van der Klift M, Weel AE. et al. Fracture incidence and association with bone mineral density in elderly men and women: the Rotterdam Study. Bone 2004; 34: 195-202 DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2003.10.001. (PMID: 14751578)
• 4 Schreiber JJ, Anderson PA, Rosas HG. et al. Hounsfield units for assessing bone mineral density and strength: a tool for osteoporosis management. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2011; 93: 1057-63 DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.J.00160. (PMID: 21655899)
• 5 Wagner SC, Formby PM, Helgeson MD. et al. Diagnosing the Undiagnosed: Osteoporosis in Patients Undergoing Lumbar Fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2016; 41: E1279-E1283 DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001612. (PMID: 27802255)
• 6 Shirley M, Wanderman N, Keaveny T. et al. Opportunistic Computed Tomography and Spine Surgery: A Narrative Review. Global Spine J 2020; 10: 919-928 DOI: 10.1177/2192568219889362. (PMID: 32905730)
• 7 Diaz-Romero R, Henriquez MS, Melian KA. et al. Practice Patterns of Spine Surgeons Regarding Osteoporosis: An International Survey. Int J Spine Surg 2021; 15: 376-385 DOI: 10.14444/8049. (PMID: 33900997)
• 8 Ehresman J, Schilling A, Yang X. et al. Vertebral bone quality score predicts fragility fractures independently of bone mineral density. Spine J 2021; 21: 20-27 DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2020.05.540. (PMID: 32474223)
• 9 Carlson BC, Robinson WA, Wanderman NR. et al. A Review and Clinical Perspective of the Impact of Osteoporosis on the Spine. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil 2019; 10: 2151459319861591 DOI: 10.1177/2151459319861591. (PMID: 31360592)
• 10 Buerba RA, Sharma A, Ziino C. et al. Bisphosphonate and Teriparatide Use in Thoracolumbar Spinal Fusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Comparative Studies. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2018; 43: E1014-E1023 DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002608. (PMID: 29462070)
• 11 Kawabata A, Yoshii T, Hirai T. et al. Effect of bisphosphonates or teriparatide on mechanical complications after posterior instrumented fusion for osteoporotic vertebral fracture: a multi-center retrospective study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2020; 21: 420 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-020-03452-6. (PMID: 32611386)
• 12 Cheng SH, Kuo YJ, Chen C. et al. Effects of teriparatide and bisphosphonate on spinal fusion procedure: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. PLoS One 2020; 15: e0237566 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237566. (PMID: 32870946)
• 13 Tani S, Ishikawa K, Kudo Y. et al. The effect of denosumab on pedicle screw fixation: a prospective 2-year longitudinal study using finite element analysis. J Orthop Surg Res 2021; 16: 219 DOI: 10.1186/s13018-021-02360-2. (PMID: 33771178)
• 14 Makino T, Tsukazaki H, Ukon Y. et al. The Biological Enhancement of Spinal Fusion for Spinal Degenerative Disease. Int J Mol Sci 2018; 19 DOI: 10.3390/ijms19082430. (PMID: 30126106)
• 15 Bone HG, Wagman RB, Brandi ML. et al. 10 years of denosumab treatment in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: results from the phase 3 randomised FREEDOM trial and open-label extension. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2017; 5: 513-523 DOI: 10.1016/S2213-8587(17)30138-9. (PMID: 28546097)
• 16 Delgado-Fernandez J, Garcia-Pallero MA, Blasco G. et al. Review of Cortical Bone Trajectory: Evidence of a New Technique. Asian Spine J 2017; 11: 817-831 DOI: 10.4184/asj.2017.11.5.817. (PMID: 29093793)
• 17 Ueno M, Imura T, Inoue G. et al. Posterior corrective fusion using a double-trajectory technique (cortical bone trajectory combined with traditional trajectory) for degenerative lumbar scoliosis with osteoporosis: technical note. J Neurosurg Spine 2013; 19: 600-607 DOI: 10.3171/2013.7.SPINE13191. (PMID: 24010899)
• 18 Zhuang XM, Yu BS, Zheng ZM. et al. Effect of the degree of osteoporosis on the biomechanical anchoring strength of the sacral pedicle screws: an in vitro comparison between unaugmented bicortical screws and polymethylmethacrylate augmented unicortical screws. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2010; 35: E925-E931
• 19 Pfeiffer FM, Abernathie DL, Smith DE. A comparison of pullout strength for pedicle screws of different designs: a study using tapped and untapped pilot holes. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2006; 31: E867-E870
• 20 Hasegawa T, Inufusa A, Imai Y. et al. Hydroxyapatite-coating of pedicle screws improves resistance against pull-out force in the osteoporotic canine lumbar spine model: a pilot study. Spine J 2005; 5: 239-243 DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2004.11.010. (PMID: 15863077)
• 21 Koller H, Zenner J, Hitzl W. et al. The impact of a distal expansion mechanism added to a standard pedicle screw on pullout resistance. A biomechanical study. Spine J 2013; 13: 532-541 DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.01.038. (PMID: 23415899)
• 22 Tai CL, Tsai TT, Lai PL. et al. A Biomechanical Comparison of Expansive Pedicle Screws for Severe Osteoporosis: The Effects of Screw Design and Cement Augmentation. PLoS One 2015; 10: e0146294 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0146294. (PMID: 26720724)
• 23 Kiyak G, Balikci T, Heydar AM. et al. Comparison of the Pullout Strength of Different Pedicle Screw Designs and Augmentation Techniques in an Osteoporotic Bone Model. Asian Spine J 2018; 12: 3-11 DOI: 10.4184/asj.2018.12.1.3. (PMID: 29503676)
• 24 Becker S, Chavanne A, Spitaler R. et al. Assessment of different screw augmentation techniques and screw designs in osteoporotic spines. Eur Spine J 2008; 17: 1462-1469 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-008-0769-8. (PMID: 18781342)
• 25 Zhang J, Wang G, Zhang N. A meta-analysis of complications associated with the use of cement-augmented pedicle screws in osteoporosis of spine. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2020; DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2020.102791. (PMID: 33338677)
• 26 Schmidt R, Cakir B, Mattes T. et al. Cement leakage during vertebroplasty: an underestimated problem?. Eur Spine J 2005; 14: 466-473 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-004-0839-5. (PMID: 15690210)
• 27 Echt M, Ranson W, Steinberger J. et al. A Systematic Review of Treatment Strategies for the Prevention of Junctional Complications After Long-Segment Fusions in the Osteoporotic Spine. Global Spine J 2021; 11: 792-801 DOI: 10.1177/2192568220939902. (PMID: 32748633)
• 28 Pare PE, Chappuis JL, Rampersaud R. et al. Biomechanical evaluation of a novel fenestrated pedicle screw augmented with bone cement in osteoporotic spines. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2011; 36: E1210-E1214 DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318205e3af. (PMID: 21325986)
• 29 Matsunaga T, Miyagi M, Nakazawa T. et al. Prevalence and Characteristics of Spinal Sagittal Malalignment in Patients with Osteoporosis. 2021 10.
• 30 Lee JS, Lee HS, Shin JK. et al. Prediction of sagittal balance in patients with osteoporosis using spinopelvic parameters. Eur Spine J 2013; 22: 1053-1058 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-013-2672-1. (PMID: 23354778)
• 31 Iyer S, Lenke LG, Nemani VM. et al. Variations in Sagittal Alignment Parameters Based on Age: A Prospective Study of Asymptomatic Volunteers Using Full-Body Radiographs. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2016; 41: 1826-1836 DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001642. (PMID: 27111763)
• 32 Zhu MP, Tetreault LA, Sorefan-Mangou F. et al. Efficacy, safety, and economics of bracing after spine surgery: a systematic review of the literature. Spine J 2018; 18: 1513-1525 DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2018.01.011. (PMID: 29355785)
• 33 Yee AJ, Yoo JU, Marsolais EB. et al. Use of a postoperative lumbar corset after lumbar spinal arthrodesis for degenerative conditions of the spine. A prospective randomized trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008; 90: 2062-2068 DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.G.01093. (PMID: 18829902)
• 34 Newman M, Minns Lowe C, Barker K. Spinal Orthoses for Vertebral Osteoporosis and Osteoporotic Vertebral Fracture: A Systematic Review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2016; 97: 1013-1025 DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2015.10.108. (PMID: 26615791)
• 35 Jacobs E, Senden R, McCrum C. et al. Effect of a semirigid thoracolumbar orthosis on gait and sagittal alignment in patients with an osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture. Clin Interv Aging 2019; 14: 671-680 DOI: 10.2147/CIA.S199853. (PMID: 31043773)