Strukturierte Auswertung der multiparametrischen MRT der Mamma

Zusammenfassung

Die MRT der Brust gilt als das sensitivste Verfahren zum Nachweis von Brustkrebs. Bleiben die konventionellen Befunde unklar, ist die MRT ein hochspezifisches diagnostisches Verfahren, mit dem sich Biopsien vermeiden lassen. Aktueller Standard ist dabei die multiparametrische MRM, die Kombination aus T2w, diffusionsgewichteten und kontrastangehobenen T1w Aufnahmen.

Abstract

Breast MRI is considered the most sensitive method for detection of breast cancer. In case of equivocal conventional imaging findings, breast MRI is a highly specific diagnostic test and can avoid unnecessary biopsies. Current standard are multiparametric protocols that combine T2w, diffusion-weighted and contrast-enhanced dynamic T1w image acquisitions.

Schlüsselwörter

multiparametrische Mamma-MRT - BI-RADS - Kaiser-Score

Key words

multiparametric breast MRI - BI-RADS - Kaiser-Score

• Literatur

• 1 Baltzer PAT. Supplemental screening using breast MRI in women with mammographically dense breasts. Eur J Radiol 2021; 136: 109513
• 2 Bennani-Baiti B, Bennani-Baiti N, Baltzer PA. Diagnostic Performance of Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Non-Calcified Equivocal Breast Findings: Results from a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. PLoS One 2016; 11: e0160346
• 3 Fueger BJ, Clauser P, Kapetas P. et al. Can supplementary contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast avoid needle biopsies in suspicious microcalcifications seen on mammography? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Breast 2021; 56: 53-60
• 4 Clauser P, Mann R, Athanasiou A. et al. A survey by the European Society of Breast Imaging on the utilisation of breast MRI in clinical practice. Eur Radiol 2018; 28: 1909-1918
• 5 Dietzel M, Baltzer PAT. How to use the Kaiser score as a clinical decision rule for diagnosis in multiparametric breast MRI: a pictorial essay. Insights Imaging 2018; 9: 325-335
• 6 Mann RM, Balleyguier C, Baltzer PA. et al. Breast MRI: EUSOBI recommendations for womenʼs information. Eur Radiol 2015; 25: 3669-3678
• 7 Kaiser WA, Zeitler E. MR imaging of the breast: fast imaging sequences with and without Gd-DTPA. Preliminary observations. Radiology 1989; 170: 681-686
• 8 Bennani-Baiti B, Krug B, Giese D. et al. Evaluation of 3.0-T MRI Brain Signal after Exposure to Gadoterate Meglumine in Women with High Breast Cancer Risk and Screening Breast MRI. Radiology 2019; 293: 523-530
• 9 Clauser P, Pinker K, Helbich TH. et al. Fat saturation in dynamic breast MRI at 3 Tesla: is the Dixon technique superior to spectral fat saturation? A visual grading characteristics study. Eur Radiol 2014;
• 10 Baltzer P, Mann RM, Iima M. et al. Diffusion-weighted imaging of the breast-a consensus and mission statement from the EUSOBI International Breast Diffusion-Weighted Imaging working group. Eur Radiol 2020; 30: 1436-1450
• 11 Spick C, Bickel H, Pinker K. et al. Diffusion-weighted MRI of breast lesions: a prospective clinical investigation of the quantitative imaging biomarker characteristics of reproducibility, repeatability, and diagnostic accuracy. NMR Biomed 2016; 29: 1445-1453
• 12 Marino MA, Clauser P, Woitek R. et al. A simple scoring system for breast MRI interpretation: does it compensate for reader experience?. Eur Radiol 2016; 26: 2529-2537
• 13 Clauser P, Dietzel M, Weber M. et al. Motion artifacts, lesion type, and parenchymal enhancement in breast MRI: what does really influence diagnostic accuracy?. Acta Radiol 2019; 60: 19-27
• 14 ACR BI-RADS Atlas 5th Edition. 5th edition. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology; 2013
• 15 Lindenblatt N, El-Rabadi K, Helbich TH. et al. Correlation between MRI results and intraoperative findings in patients with silicone breast implants. Int J Womens Health 2014; 6: 703-709
• 16 Baltzer PAT, Freiberg C, Beger S. et al. Clinical MR-mammography: are computer-assisted methods superior to visual or manual measurements for curve type analysis? A systematic approach. Acad Radiol 2009; 16: 1070-1076
• 17 Vag T, Baltzer PAT, Dietzel M. et al. Kinetic analysis of lesions without mass effect on breast MRI using manual and computer-assisted methods. Eur Radiol 2011; 21: 893-898
• 18 Baltzer PAT, Dietzel M, Kaiser WA. A simple and robust classification tree for differentiation between benign and malignant lesions in MR-mammography. Eur Radiol 2013; 23: 2051-2060
• 19 Morris EA, Comstock C, Lee C. et al. ACR BI-RADS^® Magnetic Resonance Imaging. In: ACR BI-RADS^® Atlas, Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology; 2013
• 20 Clauser P, Krug B, Bickel H. et al. Diffusion-weighted imaging allows for downgrading MR BI-RADS4 lesions in contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast to avoid unnecessary biopsy. Clin Cancer Res 2021;
• 21 Spick C, Baltzer PAT. Diagnostic utility of second-look US for breast lesions identified at MR imaging: systematic review and meta-analysis. Radiology 2014; 273: 401-409