Die Sicherheit des Lebendnierenspenders – Das Deutsche Lebendspende Register SOLKID-GNR – Entstehung und Struktur eines nationalen Registers in der Versorgungsforschung

Zusammenfassung

Im Deutschen Lebendspende Register SOLKID-GNR (Safety of the Living Kidney Donor – The German National Register) werden medizinische und psychosoziale Daten zum Outcome von Lebendnierenspender erhoben. Die prospektive Datenerhebung ermöglicht erstmals in Deutschland eine wissenschaftlich fundierte Langzeitanalyse, wie sich eine Lebendnierenspende auf die psychische und physische Gesundheit von Lebendnierenspendern auswirkt. Dies trägt direkt zu einer Verbesserung der Information und Versorgung der Lebendnierenspender bei.

Abstract

The German living donor register Safety of the Living Kidney Donor – The German National Register (SOLKID-GNR) collects data of the medical and psychosocial outcome of living kidney donors. For the first time in Germany, a prospective data collection allows a scientifically based long-term analysis of how a living kidney donation influences the psychological and physical health of living kidney donors. This will contribute directly to improve the information and care of living kidney donors.

Schlüsselwörter

Lebendspender - Lebendnierenspende - Register - SOLKID-GNR - Transplantationsnephrologie

Key words

Living donor - Living kidney donation - Transplantation nephrology

Publication History

Article published online:
03 November 2021

• Literatur

• 1 Sommerer C, Feuerstein D, Dikow R. et al Psychosocial and physical outcome following kidney donation-a retrospective analysis. Transpl Int 2015; 28: 416-428
• 2 Kroencke S, Fischer L, Nashan B. et al A prospective study on living related kidney donors' quality of life in the first year: choosing appropriate reference data. Clin Transpl 2012; 26: E418-E427
• 3 Meyer KB, Hartmann A, Mjoen G. et al Relationships Between Clinical, Self-Reported, and Donation Specific Outcomes: A Prospective Follow-up Study 10 Years After Kidney Donation. Ann Transplant 2017; 22: 148-155
• 4 Janki S, Klop KW, Dooper IM. et al More than a decade after live donor nephrectomy: a prospective cohort study. Transpl Int 2015; 28: 1268-1275
• 5 Gross CR, Messersmith EE, Hong BA. et al Health-related quality of life in kidney donors from the last five decades: results from the RELIVE study. Am J Transplant 2013; 13: 2924-2934
• 6 Timmerman L, Laging M, Timman R. et al The impact of the donors’ and recipients’ medical complications on living kidney donors’ mental health. Transpl Int 2016; 29: 589-602
• 7 Clemens K, Boudville N, Dew MA. et al The long-term quality of life of living kidney donors: a multicenter cohort study. Am J Transplant 2011; 11: 463-469
• 8 Wirken L, van Middendorp H, Hooghof CW. et al The Course and Predictors of Health-Related Quality of Life in Living Kidney Donors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Am J Transplant 2015; 15: 3041-3054
• 9 Lentine KL, Schnitzler MA, Xiao H. et al Depression diagnoses after living kidney donation: linking U.S. Registry data and administrative claims. Transplantation 2012; 94: 77-83
• 10 Muzaale AD, Massie AB, Segev DL. Concerns about the long-term safety of live kidney donors are justified. Eur J Epidemiol 2017; 32: 91-93
• 11 Mjoen G, Holdaas H. Long term risk of mortality after living kidney donation. BMJ 2017; 357: j1770
• 12 Mjoen G, Hallan S, Hartmann A. et al Long-term risks for kidney donors. Kidney Int 2014; 86: 162-167
• 13 Suwelack B, Wormann V, Berger K. et al Investigation of the physical and psychosocial outcomes after living kidney donation – A multicentre cohort study (SoLKiD – Safety of Living Kidney Donors). BMC Nephrol 2018; 19: 83
• 14 Harris PA, Taylor R, Minor BL. Et al The REDCap consortium: Building an international community of software platform partners. J Biomed Inform 2019; 95: 103208
• 15 Lablans M, Borg A, Ückert F. A RESTful interface to pseudonymization services in modern web applications. BMC medical informatics and decision making 2015; 15: 2
• 16 Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB. The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Med 2001; 16: 606-613
• 17 Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB. et al The Patient Health Questionnaire Somatic, Anxiety, and Depressive Symptom Scales: a systematic review. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 2010; 32: 345-359
• 18 Löwe B, Kroenke K, Herzog W. et al Measuring depression outcome with a brief self-report instrument: Sensitivity to change of the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9). Journal of Affective Disorder 2004; 81: 61-66
• 19 Smets EM, Garssen B, Bonke B. et al The Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI) psychometric qualities of an instrument to assess fatigue. J Psychosom Res 1995; 39: 315-325
• 20 Bullinger M, Kirchberger I, Ware J. The German SF-36 Health Survey Translation and Psychometric Testing of a Generic Instrument for the Assessment of Health-Related Quality of Life. Z.f.Gesundheitswiss 1995; 3: 21-36
• 21 Simmons RG, Marine SK, Simmons RL. Gift of life: the effect of organ transplantation on individual, family, and societal dynamics. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers; 1987
• 22 Leppert K, Koch B, Brähler E. et al Die Resilienzskala (RS) – Überprüfung der Langform RS-25 und einer Kurzform RS-13. Klin Diagnostik und Evaluation 2008; 1: 226-243
• 23 Wagnild GM, Young HM. Development and psychometric evaluation of the Resilience Scale. J Nurs Meas 1993; 1: 165-178
• 24 Pommerening K, Drepper J, Helbing K. et al Leitfaden zum Datenschutz in medizinischen Forschungsprojekten. Generische Lösungen der TMF 2.0. Berlin: Medizinisch Wissenschaftliche Verlagsgesellschaft; 2014