Endoscopy 2022; 54(04): 376-381
DOI: 10.1055/a-1544-4923
Innovations and brief communications

Gastric per-oral endoscopic myotomy (G-POEM) for the treatment of gastric sleeve stenosis: a feasibility and safety study

Linda Y. Zhang
1   Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
,
Marcia I. Canto
1   Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
,
Michael A. Schweitzer
2   Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
,
Mouen A. Khashab
1   Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
,
Vivek Kumbhari
1   Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
3   Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Jacksonville, Florida, United States
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Background Traditional endoscopic treatments have limited success in gastric sleeve stenosis (GSS). Gastric peroral endoscopic myotomy (G-POEM) could conceivably obliterate the twist/angulation that causes GSS through a tunneled stricturotomy. We report early outcomes of G-POEM for GSS treatment.

Methods We retrospectively reviewed all patients with GSS treated with G-POEM at our center. The primary end point was clinical success, defined as symptom improvement with resumption of adequate oral intake, without requiring further intervention.

Results 13 patients (mean age 43 ± 10.9 years; 12 female) underwent G-POEM for predominantly helical (11/13, 85 %) GSS. Three (23 %) had concurrent sleeve leak and 10 (77 %) had prior GSS treatment. Two intraoperative complications occurred, with no deviation to the procedure; no major complications occurred. At median follow-up of 175 (interquartile range [IQR] 119–260) days, clinical success was achieved in 10 patients (77 %). Median Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index score in responders decreased from 2.06 (IQR 1.5–2.8) to 0.39 (IQR 0.2–0.5). Three patients (23 %) required surgical revision.

Conclusions G-POEM was feasible and safe, and may provide an alternative option for those averse to undergoing surgical revision for treatment of GSS.

Tables 1 s, 2 s, Figs. 1 s–3 s



Publication History

Received: 07 March 2021

Accepted after revision: 05 July 2021

Accepted Manuscript online:
05 July 2021

Article published online:
13 September 2021

© 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 
  • References

  • 1 Fayad L, Simsek C, Oleas R. et al. Safety and efficacy of endoscopically secured fully covered self-expandable metallic stents (FCSEMS) for post-bariatric complex stenosis. Obes Surg 2019; 29: 3484-3492
  • 2 Agnihotri A, Barola S, Hill C. et al. An algorithmic approach to the management of gastric stenosis following laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Obes Surg 2017; 27: 2628-2636
  • 3 Jaruvongvanich V, Matar R, Beran A. et al. A protocolized approach to endoscopic hydrostatic versus pneumatic balloon dilation therapy for gastric sleeve stenosis: a multicenter study and meta-analysis. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2020; 16: 1543-1553
  • 4 Donatelli G, Dumont JL, Pourcher G. et al. Pneumatic dilation for functional helix stenosis after sleeve gastrectomy: long-term follow-up (with videos). Surg Obes Relat Dis 2017; 13: 943-950
  • 5 Parikh A, Alley JB, Peterson RM. et al. Management options for symptomatic stenosis after laparoscopic vertical sleeve gastrectomy in the morbidly obese. Surg Endosc 2012; 26: 738-746
  • 6 Kumbhari V, Cummings DE, Kalloo AN. et al. AGA Clinical practice update on evaluation and management of early complications after bariatric/metabolic surgery: expert review. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2021; DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2021.03.020.
  • 7 Revicki DA, Rentz AM, Dubois D. et al. Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index (GCSI): development and validation of a patient reported assessment of severity of gastroparesis symptoms. Qual Life Res 2004; 13: 833-844
  • 8 Zhang LY, Dinary F, Farha J. et al. Gastric per-oral endoscopic myotomy for treatment of chronic proximal staple line leak precipitated by downstream stenosis. Obes Surg 2021; 31: 3347-3352
  • 9 Farha J, Fayad L, Kadhim A. et al. Gastric per-oral endoscopic myotomy (G-POEM) for the treatment of gastric stenosis post-laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). Obes Surg 2019; 29: 2350-2354
  • 10 Kahaleh M, Gonzalez JM, Xu MM. et al. Gastric peroral endoscopic myotomy for the treatment of refractory gastroparesis: a multicenter international experience. Endoscopy 2018; 50: 1053-1058
  • 11 Yu JX, Baker JR, Watts L. et al. Functional lumen imaging probe is useful for the quantification of gastric sleeve stenosis and prediction of response to endoscopic dilation: a pilot study. Obes Surg 2020; 30: 786-789
  • 12 Dapri G, Cadière GB, Himpens J. Laparoscopic seromyotomy for long stenosis after sleeve gastrectomy with or without duodenal switch. Obes Surg 2009; 19: 495-499
  • 13 Vilallonga R, Himpens J, van de Vrande S. Laparoscopic management of persistent strictures after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Obes Surg 2013; 23: 1655-1661
  • 14 Kumbhari V, Abu Dayyeh BK. Keeping the fistula open: paradigm shift in the management of leaks after bariatric surgery?. Endoscopy 2016; 48: 789-791
  • 15 Deslauriers V, Beauchamp A, Garofalo F. et al. Endoscopic management of post-laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy stenosis. Surg Endosc 2018; 32: 601-609
  • 16 Shnell M, Gluck N, Abu-Abeid S. et al. Use of endoscopic septotomy for the treatment of late staple-line leaks after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Endoscopy 2017; 49: 59-63
  • 17 Mahadev S, Kumbhari V, Campos JM. et al. Endoscopic septotomy: an effective approach for internal drainage of sleeve gastrectomy-associated collections. Endoscopy 2017; 49: 504-508