DeGIR Quality Report 2019: Report on the treatment quality of minimally invasive methods – Interventional therapy (EVAR) of abdominal aortic aneurysms

Abstract

Purpose To analyze the quality of endovascular aortic aneurysm repair using the data of the DeGIR quality management system. Comparison of data between 2011 and 2019.

Materials and Methods A retrospective analysis of all data registered in the DeGIR quality management system of the year 2019 was performed regarding the treatment quality for endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. Registration of data was voluntary. As quality parameters indication, treatment process data and quality of results were examined. The latter was judged by treatment success, complication rates and radiation exposure.

Results Out of 189 590 data sets overall 1639 cases of EVAR were registered; compared to 2011 this was an increase of 472 cases. 5.9 % of these cases encompassed emergency treatments. The most frequent indication was an abdominal aneurysm with 72 % of cases. In 54 % of cases, the aortic diameter ranged 50–70 mm. The rates for technical success, over all complications and major complications were 92.8 %, 6.7 % and 6.0 % respectively for all EVAR including emergency indications. In general, EVAR yielded a mortality rate of 1.2 % while emergency procedures had a mortality rate of 7.3 %. Median dose area product and fluoroscopy time were 10 503 cGy × cm2 and 20 minutes respectively at a mean procedure time of 114 minutes.

Conclusion Data analysis of the DeGIR quality management system persistently showed a very high technical success rate for endovascular aortic aneurysm repair performed by interventional radiologists accompanied by a low complication rate.

Key Points 

• The voluntary DeGIR quality assurance-system has reached high acceptance among interventional radiologists.

• The database has nearly 200 000 submissions on record for 2019.

• EVAR by interventional radiologists has shown very high technical success as well as a low complication rate.

Citation Format

• Frenzel F, Bücker A, Paprottka P et al. DeGIR Quality Report 2019: Report on the treatment quality of minimally invasive methods – Interventional therapy (EVAR) of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2022; 194: 49 – 61

Key words

quality management - interventional Radiology - aortic aneurysm - EVAR - stents - arteriosclerosis

Publication History

Received: 11 April 2021

Accepted: 17 June 2021

Article published online:
05 August 2021

• References

• 1 Heuser L. Qualitätssicherung und Dokumentation in der interventionellen+B52 Gefäßmedizin. Epub ahead of print In: Operative und interventionelle Gefäßmedizin. 2018. 2018. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-45856-3_46-1
• 2 Bücker A, Gross-Fengels W, Haage P. et al Qualifizierungsleitlinie der Deutschen Röntgengesellschaft (DRG) und der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Interventionelle Radiologie und minimalinvasive Therapie (DeGIR) zur Durchführung interventionell-radiologischer minimalinvasiver Verfahren an Arterien und. RöFo - Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Röntgenstrahlen und der Bildgeb Verfahren Epub ahead of print 2012; DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1312756.
• 3 Heuser LJ, Arnold CN, Morhard D. et al Qualitätsreport 2011: Bericht über die Behandlungsqualität minimalinvasiver Methoden – Teil 2 Interventionelle Therapie (EVAR) von Aortenaneurysmen. RoFo Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Rontgenstrahlen und der Bildgeb Verfahren Epub ahead of print 2013; DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1335736.
• 4 Society of Interventional Radiology Standards of Practice Committee. Guidelines for Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty. J Vasc Interv Radiol Epub ahead of print 2003; DOI: 10.1097/01.RVI.0000094586.83406.ac.
• 5 Statistisches Bundesamt (Destatis). Gesundheitsberichterstattung des Bundes – Verteilung der Bevölkerung nach ihrem Rauchverhalten (1992–2017). accessed 14 Mar 2021. https://www.gbe-bund.de/gbe/!pkg_olap_tables.prc_set_orientation?p_uid=gast&p_aid=7308363&p_sprache=D&p_help=2&p_indnr=436&p_ansnr=10864814&p_version=6&D.000=2&D.002=3&D.003=1&D.469=1
• 6 Carnevale M, Koleilat I, Lipsitz EC. et al Extended Screening Guidelines for the Diagnosis of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm. J Vasc Surg Epub ahead of print 2020; DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2020.04.321.
• 7 Maßmann A, Shayesteh-Kheslat R, Frenzel F. et al New developements in endovascular infrarenal aortic aneurysm treatment. Radiologe Epub ahead of print 2018; DOI: 10.1007/s00117-018-0440-2.
• 8 Rogers IS, Massaro JM, Truong QA. et al Distribution, determinants, and normal reference values of thoracic and abdominal aortic diameters by computed tomography (from the framingham heart study). Am J Cardiol Epub ahead of print 2013; DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2013.01.306.
• 9 Schegerer AA, Loose R, Heuser L. et al Diagnostic reference levels for diagnostic and interventional X-ray procedures in Germany: Update and handling – Answer to the comments of members of the chest radiology workshop of the German Roentgen Society. RoFo Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Rontgenstrahlen und der Bildgebenden Verfahren Epub ahead of print 2020; DOI: 10.1055/a-1064-0559.