PDF herunterladen
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Endosc Int Open 2021; 09(08): E1196-E1197
DOI: 10.1055/a-1495-5077
Editorial

Proportionate patient safety incident reviews: making them less complicated

Manmeet Matharoo
1   Wolfson Unit for Endoscopy, St. Mark’s Hospital, Harrow, United Kingdom
,
Matt D. Rutter
2   Gastroenterology, University Hospital of North Tees, Stockton-on-Tees, United Kingdom
3   Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, United Kingdom
› Institutsangaben
› Weitere Informationen
Auch verfügbar auf
   Lizenzen und Reprints

Globally, the provision of gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy is grounded in quality assurance processes to safeguard patient safety. In the UK, the Joint Advisory Group on GI Endoscopy (JAG) oversees this function and its Global Rating Scale is a robust model for high-level quality assurance [1]. In addition, UK endoscopy benefits from comprehensive national datasets from its Bowel Cancer Screening Programme [2] and the National Endoscopy Database [3], enabling close scrutiny of key performance indicators.



Publikationsverlauf

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
16. Juli 2021

© 2021. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

Einführung zu:

A three-tiered approach to investigating patient safety incidents in endoscopy: 4-year experience in a teaching hospitalEndosc Int Open 2021; 09(08): E1188-E1195
DOI: 10.1055/a-1479-2556

 

  • References

  • 1 Siau K, Green J, Hawkes N. et al. Impact of the Joint Advisory Group on Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (JAG) on endoscopy services in the UK and beyond. Frontline Gastroenterol 2019; 10: 93-106
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Lee TJW, Rutter MD, Blanks RG. et al. Colonoscopy quality measures: experience from the NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme. Gut 2012; 61: 1050-1057
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Lee TJW, Siau K, Esmaily S. et al. Development of a national automated endoscopy database: The United Kingdom National Endoscopy Database (NED). United European Gastroenterol J 2019; 7: 798-806
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Matharoo MK, Haycock A, Sevdalis N. et al. A prospective study of patient safety incidents in gastrointestinal endoscopy. Endosc Int Open 2017; 5: E83-E89
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Berry P, Sreelakshmi K, Tritto G. et al. A three-tiered approach to investigating patient safety incidents in endoscopy: 4 year experience in a teaching hospital. Endosc Int Open 2021; 09: E1188-E1195
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Peerally MF, Carr S, Waring J. et al. The problem with root cause analysis. BMJ Qual and Saf 2017; 26: 417-422
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Wu AW. Medical error: the second victim. The doctor who makes the mistake needs help too. BMJ 2000; 320: 726-727
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Vincent CA, Coulter A. Patient safety: what about the patient?. Qual Saf Health Care 2002; 11: 76-80
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Hayee B, Thoufeeq M, Rees CJ. et al. Safely restarting GI endoscopy in the era of COVID-19. Gut 2020; 69: 2063-2070
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Syed M. Black box thinking: marginal gains and the secret of high performance. London: John Murray Press; 2015
    Google Scholar
  • 11 Thomas-Gibson S, Matharoo M, Siau K. et al. Improving safety and reducing error in endoscopy (ISREE) a JAG initiative. Gut 2018; 67: A34
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Joint Advisory Group on GI Endoscopy. Contribute to JAGʼs case of the month series. https://www.thejag.org.uk/news/contribute-to-jags-case-of-the-month-series
    PubMedGoogle Scholar