Download PDF
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Endosc Int Open 2021; 09(07): E1158-E1163
DOI: 10.1055/a-1401-9962
Innovation forum

Preoperative perihilar cholangiocarcinoma assessment using virtual endoscopic imaging magnetic resonance cholangioscopy

Mitsuru Okuno
1   Department of Gastroenterology, Gifu Municipal Hospital, Gifu, Japan
,
Tsuyoshi Mukai
1   Department of Gastroenterology, Gifu Municipal Hospital, Gifu, Japan
,
Shota Iwata
1   Department of Gastroenterology, Gifu Municipal Hospital, Gifu, Japan
,
Ryuichi Tezuka
1   Department of Gastroenterology, Gifu Municipal Hospital, Gifu, Japan
,
Naoya Mita
2   First Department of Internal Medicine, Gifu University Hospital, Gifu, Japan
,
Shinya Uemura
2   First Department of Internal Medicine, Gifu University Hospital, Gifu, Japan
,
Takuji Iwashita
2   First Department of Internal Medicine, Gifu University Hospital, Gifu, Japan
,
Akinori Maruta
3   Department of Gastroenterology, Gifu Prefecture General Medical Center, Gifu, Japan
,
Keisuke Iwata
3   Department of Gastroenterology, Gifu Prefecture General Medical Center, Gifu, Japan
,
Eiichi Tomita
1   Department of Gastroenterology, Gifu Municipal Hospital, Gifu, Japan
,
Masahito Shimizu
2   First Department of Internal Medicine, Gifu University Hospital, Gifu, Japan
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
Also available at
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Background and study aims Preoperative assessment of the superficial ductal spread (SDS) of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PCCA) is important for determining its resectability. A virtual endoscopic imaging method, magnetic resonance cholangioscopy (MRCS), wherein a three-dimensional image is created from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data, can evaluate all aspects of arbitrary bile ducts.

Patients and methods Overall, 15 patients with PCCA who underwent preoperative MRI were enrolled. All patients underwent surgical treatment.

Results MRCS could be performed based on preoperative MRI data in all patients. MRCS could not be used in one patient due to debris in the obstructed bile duct. The remaining 14 patients (93 %) were diagnosed with obstructed bile duct or irregular surface of the bile duct, signifying tumor invasion. The accuracy rate of diagnosing the SDS was 93 % (14/15). Seven patients underwent preoperative peroral cholangioscopy; the scope could not pass through the tumor in three patients. In these three patients, MRCS was able to be use dtoevaluate the obstructed side of the bile duct and faciliated accurate diagnosis of SDS.

Conclusions MRCS can be used to noninvasively evaluate the bile duct in all directions. This novel method makes it easy to create virtual images and can be useful for diagnosing the preoperative SDS of PCCA.

Supplementary material



Publication History

Received: 02 December 2020

Accepted: 15 February 2021

Article published online:
21 June 2021

© 2021. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 

  • References

  • 1 Hintze RE, Abou-Rebyeh H, Adler A. et al. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography-guided unilateral endoscopic stent placement for Klatskin tumors. Gastrointest Endosc 2001; 53: 40-46
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Lee SS, Kim MH, Lee SK. et al. MR cholangiography versus cholangioscopy for evaluation of longitudinal extension of hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Gastrointest Endosc 2002; 56: 25-32
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Materne R, Van Beers BE, Gigot JF. et al. Extrahepatic biliary obstruction: magnetic resonance imaging compared with endoscopic ultrasonography. Endoscopy 2000; 32: 3-9
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Blechacz B, Gores GJ. Cholangiocarcinoma: advances in pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment. Hepatology 2008; 48: 308-321
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Adamek HE, Albert J, Weitz M. et al. A prospective evaluation of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in patients with suspected bile duct obstruction. Gut 1998; 43: 680-683
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Feldman DR, Kulling DP, Kay CL. et al. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: a novel approach to the evaluation of suspected pancreaticobiliary neoplasms. Ann Surg Oncol 1997; 4: 634-638
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Fulcher AS, Turner MA, Capps GW. et al. Half-Fourier RARE MR cholangiopancreatography: experience in 300 subjects. Radiology 1998; 207: 21-32
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Rosch T, Meining A, Fruhmorgen S. et al. A prospective comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of ERCP, MRCP, CT, and EUS in biliary strictures. Gastrointest Endosc 2002; 55: 870-876
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Nishikawa T, Tsuyuguchi T, Sakai Y. et al. Preoperative assessment of longitudinal extension of cholangiocarcinoma with peroral video-cholangioscopy: a prospective study. Dig Endos 2014; 26: 450-457
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Itoi T, Sofuni A, Itokawa F. et al. Peroral cholangioscopic diagnosis of biliary-tract diseases by using narrow-band imaging (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc 2007; 66: 730-736
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar