B&G Bewegungstherapie und Gesundheitssport 2021; 37(02): 77-82
DOI: 10.1055/a-1382-2776
Praxis

Evidenz von Trainingsempfehlungen für ein Hypertrophietraining

Evidence of recommendations for hypertrophy training
Simon Gavanda
1   IST Hochschule für Management, Fachbereich Fitness & Gesundheit
,
Eduard Isenmann
1   IST Hochschule für Management, Fachbereich Fitness & Gesundheit
2   Deutsche Sporthochschule Köln, Institut für Kreislaufforschung und Sportmedizin, Abteilung Molekulare und zelluläre Sportmedizin
› Author Affiliations

Zusammenfassung

Der Abbau der Skelettmuskulatur steigt mit zunehmendem Alter und wird in der heutigen Gesellschaft aufgrund geringerer körperlicher Aktivität zusätzlich beschleunigt. Die Skelettmuskulatur ist vor allem für die Übertragung von Kräften und somit für unsere alltäglichen Bewegungen verantwortlich. Mit der Reduzierung der Muskelmasse wird die Durchführung von Alltagsbewegungen kontinuierlich erschwert, und die Lebensqualität kann dadurch deutlich sinken. Mit Kraft- bzw. Hypertrophietraining kann jedoch einer Muskelatrophie entgegengewirkt werden, indem Abbauprozesse verlangsamt werden und die Skelettmuskulatur wieder aufgebaut wird. Trainingsempfehlungen für ein Hypertrophietraining variieren jedoch erheblich. Dieser Artikel soll vor allem den aktuellen Forschungstand zusammenfassen und praxisrelevante Empfehlungen aussprechen.

Der entscheidendste Aspekt beim Hypertrophietraining scheint lediglich das Setzen von regelmäßigen progressiven und erschöpfenden Belastungsreizen zu sein, die mindestens einen Wirkungsmechanismus aktivieren, der für hypertrophe Effekte verantwortlich ist. Vor allem die Variation der mechano-biologischen Deskriptoren (Trainingswiderstand, Anzahl Wiederholungen und Sätze, Pause etc.) könnte helfen, langfristig effektive Reize zu gestalten. Dabei kann nahezu auf unbegrenzte Kombinationsmöglichkeiten zurückgegriffen werden, welche jedoch dem Leistungsniveau und der Belastbarkeit der trainierenden Person sowie der Umsetzbarkeit im Alltag angepasst werden müssen. Nach dem Motto „viele Wege führen nach Rom“ gibt es dabei nicht nur eine konkrete Lösung bei der Planung und Durchführung eines Hypertrophietrainings. Es ist eher von essenzieller Bedeutung, dass kontinuierliche Belastungsreize in unterschiedlichen Variationen durchgeführt werden, um einen Hypertrophieeffekt zu erzeugen und folglich dem Abbau der Skelettmuskulatur entgegenzuwirken.

Summary

The breakdown of skeletal muscles increases with age and is further accelerated in today’s society due to lower physical activity. The skeletal muscles are primarily responsible for the transmission of force and thus for our everyday movement. With the reduction of muscle mass, the execution of everyday movement is continuously hampered and the quality of life can be significantly reduced. However, strength or hypertrophy training can counteract muscle atrophy by slowing down degradation processes and rebuilding skeletal muscles. Nonetheless, training recommendations for hypertrophy training vary considerably. The primary aim of this article, therefore, is to summarize the current state of research and make practical recommendations.

The most decisive aspect of hypertrophy training seems to be the setting of regular progressive and exhausting stress stimuli that activate at least one mechanism of action that is responsible for hypertrophic effects. In particular, the variation of the mechano-biological descriptors (training resistance, number of repetitions and sets, rests, etc.) could help to create long-term effective stimuli. There is almost no limit to the number of possible combinations, but these have to be adapted to the level of performance and the resilience of the training person as well as the feasibility in everyday life. As in the motto “many roads lead to Rome,” hypertrophy training does not just entail one specific solution for planning and implementation. It is more essential to perform iterative stress stimuli in different variations in order to generate a hypertrophy effect and consequently counteract the breakdown of the skeletal muscles.



Publication History

Article published online:
16 April 2021

© 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 
  • Literatur

  • 1 Koopman R, Loon LJC. Aging, exercise, and muscle protein metabolism. Journal of applied Physiology 2009; 106 (06) : 2040-2048
  • 2 John A, Buscemi S. Sarcopenia, Sarcopenic Obesity and Insulin Resistance. In:. Medical Complications of Type 2 Diabetes; edn.; 2011
  • 3 Mackley AL RL, Kadi F, Schjerling P. et al. Activation of satellite cells and the regeneration of human skeletal muscle are expedited by ingestion of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory medication. FASEB Journal 2016; 30 (06) : 2266-81
  • 4 Seynnes O, de Boer M, Narici M. Early skeletal muscle hypertrophy and architectural changes in response to high-intensity resistance training. J Appl Physiol (1985) 2007; 102 (01) : 368-373
  • 5 Toigo M. Trainingsrelevante Determinanten der molekularen und zellulären Skelettmuskeladaptation, Teil 1: Einleitung und Längenadaptation. Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Sportmedizin und Sporttraumatologie 2006; 54 (03) ), 101-107
  • 6 Schoenfeld BJ, Wilson JM, Lowery RP. Krieger JW: Muscular adaptations in low- versus high-load resistance training: A meta-analysis. Eur J Sport Sci 2016; 16 (01) : 1-10
  • 7 Schoenfeld B, Grgic J, Ogborn D, Krieger J. Strength and hypertrophy adaptations between low- vs high-load resistance training: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research 2017; 31 (12) )/ 3508-3523
  • 8 Wackerhage H, Schoenfeld BJ, Hamilton DL. et al. Stimuli and sensors that initiate skeletal muscle hypertrophy following resistance exercise. J Appl Physiol (1985) 2019; 126 (01) : 30-43
  • 9 Boeckh-Behrens W, Buskies W, Beier P. Fitness-Krafttraining, Die besten Übungen und Methoden für Sport und Gesundheit. Rowohlt Taschenbuch; 2016
  • 10 Schoenfeld BJ, Ogborn D, Krieger JW. Dose-response relationship between weekly resistance training volume and increases in muscle mass: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Sports Sci 2017; 35 (11) : 1073-1082
  • 11 Ralston GW, Kilgore L, Wyatt FB. et al. The Effect of Weekly Set Volume on Strength Gain: A Meta-Analysis. Sports Med 2017; 47 (12) : 2585-2601
  • 12 Grgic J, Lazinica B, Mikulic P. et al. The effects of short versus long inter-set rest intervals in resistance training on measures of muscle hypertrophy: A systematic review. Eur J Sport Sci 2017; 17 (08) : 983-993
  • 13 Henselmans M, Schoenfeld BJ. The effect of inter-set rest intervals on resistance exercise-induced muscle hypertrophy. Sports Med 2014; 44 (12) : 1635-1643
  • 14 Dankel SJ, Mattocks KT, Jessee MB. et al. Frequency: The Overlooked Resistance Training Variable for Inducing Muscle Hypertrophy?. Sports Med 2017; 47 (05) : 799-805
  • 15 Schoenfeld BJ, Ogborn D, Krieger JW. Effects of Resistance Training Frequency on Measures of Muscle Hypertrophy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Sports Med 2016; 46 (11) : 1689-1697
  • 16 Schoenfeld BJ, Grgic J, Krieger J. How many times per week should a muscle be trained to maximize muscle hypertrophy? A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies examining the effects of resistance training frequency. J Sports Sci 2019; 37 (11) : 1286-1295
  • 17 Damas F, Libardi CA, Ugrinowitsch C. The development of skeletal muscle hypertrophy through resistance training: the role of muscle damage and muscle protein synthesis. Eur J Appl Physiol 2018; 118 (03) : 485-500
  • 18 Schoenfeld B, Ogborn D, Vigotsky A. et al. Hypertrophic effects of concentric vs. eccentric muscle actions: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research 2017; 31 (09) )/ 2599-2608
  • 19 Schoenfeld BJ, Ogborn DI, Krieger JW. Effect of repetition duration during resistance training on muscle hypertrophy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Med 2015; 45 (04) : 577-585
  • 20 Hackett DA, Davies TB, Orr R. et al. Effect of movement velocity during resistance training on muscle-specific hypertrophy: A systematic review. Eur J Sport Sci 2018; 18 (04) : 473-482
  • 21 Lasevicius T, Schoenfeld B, Silva-Batista C. et al. Muscle Failure Promotes Greater MuscleHypertrophy in Low-Load but Not in High-LoadResistance Training. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research 2019; 00: 00
  • 22 Martorelli S, Cadore E, Izquierdo M. et al. Strength training with repetitions to failure does not provide additional strength and muscle hypertrophy gains in young women. Eur J Transl Myol 2017; 27 (02) : 113-120
  • 23 Willardson J. The application of training to failure in periodized multiple-set resistance exercise program. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research 2007; 21 (02) : 628-31
  • 24 Newmire DE, Willoughby D. Partialcompared with full range of motion resistance training for muscle hypertrophy: A brief review and an identification of potential mechanisms. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. 2018
  • 25 Schoenfeld BJ, Grgic J. Effects of range of motion on muscle development during resistance training interventions: A systematic review. SAGE Open Med 2020; 8 : 2050312120901559
  • 26 Signorile J, Lew K, Stoutenberg M. et al. Range of motion and leg rotation affect electromyography activation levels of the superficial quadriceps muscles during leg extension. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research 2014; 28 (09) / 2536-2545
  • 27 Wakahara T, Fukutani A, Kawakami Y, Yanai T. Nonuniform muscle hypertrophy: its relation to muscle activation in training session. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2013; 45 (11) : 2158-2165
  • 28 Drummond MD, Szmuchrowski LA, Goulart KN, Couto BP. Effect of strength training on regional hypertrophy of the elbow flexor muscles. Muscle Nerve 2016; 54 (04) : 750-755
  • 29 Kiely J. Periodization Paradigms in the 21st Century: Evidence-Led or Tradition-Driven?. International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance 2012; 7: 242-250
  • 30 Afonso J, Nikolaidis P, Sousa P, Mesquita I. Is Empirical Research on Periodization Trustworthy? A Comprehensive Review of Conceptual and Methodological Issues. Journal of Sports Science and Medicine 2017; (07) 16: 27-34