CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Endosc Int Open 2021; 09(04): E530-E536
DOI: 10.1055/a-1352-2761
Original article

Measurement of intragastric pressure: an objective method to ascertain whether gastric wall extension is sufficient for assessment of the non-extension sign[*]

Kentaro Imamura
1   Department of Endoscopy, Fukuoka University Chikushi Hospital, Chikusino, Japan
,
Motoko Machii
2   Department of Gastroenterology, Tobata Kyoritsu Hospital, Kitakyushu, Japan
,
Kenshi Yao
1   Department of Endoscopy, Fukuoka University Chikushi Hospital, Chikusino, Japan
,
Suketo Sou
2   Department of Gastroenterology, Tobata Kyoritsu Hospital, Kitakyushu, Japan
,
Takashi Nagahama
3   Nagahama Clinic, Fukuoka, Japan
,
Tsuneyoshi Yao
4   Department of Gastroenterology, Sada Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan
,
Takao Kanemitsu
1   Department of Endoscopy, Fukuoka University Chikushi Hospital, Chikusino, Japan
,
Masaki Miyaoka
1   Department of Endoscopy, Fukuoka University Chikushi Hospital, Chikusino, Japan
,
Kensei Ohtsu
1   Department of Endoscopy, Fukuoka University Chikushi Hospital, Chikusino, Japan
,
Toshiharu Ueki
5   Department of Gastroenterology, Fukuoka University Chikushi Hospital, Chikusino, Japan
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Background and study aims The optimal intragastric pressure (IP) for strong gastric wall extension is unclear. We aimed to develop an accurate method to measure IP using endoscopy and determine the pressure required for strong gastric wall extension.

Methods An in vitro experiment using an endoscope with a rubber attached at its tip was conducted. The process of inserting the pressure measurement probe into the forceps channel was skipped, and the tube of the pressure measurement device was directly connected to the forceps channel. In vivo, the pressure in 51 consecutive patients at the time of strong gastric wall extension was measured. Strong extension of the gastric wall was defined as when the folds in the greater curvature were flattened as a result of sufficient extension of the gastric wall by insufflated air during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. The IP at that time was measured.

Results In vitro, 20 mL of tap water was injected once into the forceps channel and then aspirated for 10 seconds. Pressure measurement after irrigation of the forceps channel as well as the measurement by inserting the probe procedure were accurately performed. In vivo, among the 51 included patients, the mean IP (range) was 14.7 mmHg (10–23). Strong extension of the gastric wall was obtained in 96.1 % of patients when the IP was 20 mmHg.

Conclusions We developed an accurate method to measure IP using upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Strong extension of the gastric wall was obtained in almost all patients when the IP was 20 mmHg.

* Meeting presentations: Asian Pacific Digestive Week (APDW) 2019 (December 14, 2019)




Publication History

Received: 14 July 2020

Accepted: 09 December 2020

Article published online:
17 March 2021

© 2021. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commecial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 
  • References

  • 1 Yao K. The endoscopic diagnosis of early gastric cancer. Ann Gastroenterol 2013; 26: 11-22
  • 2 Yao T, Tanabe H, Nagahama T. et al. Clinicopathological study for accurate endoscopic diagnosis of submucosal invasion by early gastric cancer of depressed type (in Japanese, with English abstract). Stomach Intest (Tokyo) 2008; 43: 1109-1125
  • 3 Nagahama T, Yao K, Imamura K. et al. Diagnostic performance of conventional endoscopy? in the identification of submucosal invasion by early gastric cancer: the “non-extension sign” as a simple diagnostic marker. Gastric Cancer 2017; 20: 304-313
  • 4 Carbon F, Tack J, Hoffman I. The intragastric pressure measurement: a novel method to assess gastric accommodation in functional dyspepsia children. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2017; 64: 918-924
  • 5 Oken MM, Creech RH, Tormey DC. et al. Toxicity and response criteria of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Am J Clin Oncol 1982; 5: 649-655
  • 6 Mori H, Kobara H, Muramatsu A. et al. Comparison of postoperative complications after endoscopic submucosal dissection: differences of insufflations and anesthesias. Diagn Ther Endosc 2011; DOI: 10.1155/2011/709237.
  • 7 Kimura K, Takemoto T. An endoscopic recognition of the atrophic border and its significance in chronic gastritis. Endoscopy 1969; 1: 87-97
  • 8 Sakaki N, Momma K, Egawa N. et al. The influence of Helicobacter pylori infection on the progression of gastric mucosal atrophy and occurrence of gastric cancer. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 1995; 7 Supp. 1: S59-S62
  • 9 Japanese Society for the Study of Obesity. Japanese obesity treatment guideline. (in Japanese). Tokyo: Lifescience; 2016
  • 10 Jensen MP, Turner JA, Romano JM. et al. Comparative reliability and validity of chronic pain intensity measures. Pain 1999; 83: 157-162
  • 11 Suzuki T, Hirano M, Yamamoto Y. Examination of visceral perception and gastric tone by gastric stimulation using air inflation during endoscopy. J Int Med Res 2005; 33: 160-169
  • 12 Desai KM, Sessa WC, Vane JR. Involvement of nitric oxide in the reflex relaxation of the stomach to accommodate food or fluid. Nature 1991; 351: 477-479
  • 13 Tack J, Demedts I, Meulemans A. et al. Role of nitric oxide in the gastric accommodation reflex and in meal induced satiety in humans. Gut 2002; 51: 219-224
  • 14 Lambert DM, Marceau S, Forse RA. Intra-abdominal pressure in the morbidly obese. Obes Surg 2005; 15: 1225-1232
  • 15 Wisén O, Hellström PM. Gastrointestinal motility in obesity. J Intern Med 1995; 237: 411-418