Open Access
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Endosc Int Open 2021; 09(02): E271-E277
DOI: 10.1055/a-1324-3083
Original article

Diagnostic ability of Japan Narrow-Band Imaging Expert Team classification for colorectal lesions by magnifying endoscopy with blue laser imaging versus narrow-band imaging

Renma Ito
1   Department of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy
,
Hiroaki Ikematsu
1   Department of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy
,
Tatsuro Murano
1   Department of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy
,
Kensuke Shinmura
1   Department of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy
,
Motohiro Kojima
2   Division of Pathology, National Cancer Center Hospital East
,
Kana Kumahara
1   Department of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy
,
Yasuaki Furue
1   Department of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy
,
Hironori Sunakawa
1   Department of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy
,
Tatsunori Minamide
1   Department of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy
,
Daiki Sato
1   Department of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy
,
Yoichi Yamamoto
1   Department of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy
,
Kenji Takashima
1   Department of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy
,
Yusuke Yoda
1   Department of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy
,
Keisuke Hori
1   Department of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy
,
Tomonori Yano
1   Department of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy
› Author Affiliations
Preview

Abstract

Background and study aims The Japan Narrow-band imaging (NBI) Expert Team (JNET) classification was proposed for evaluating colorectal lesions. However, it remains unknown whether the JNET classification can be applied to magnifying endoscopy with image-enhanced endoscopies other than NBI. This study aimed to compare the diagnostic ability of JNET classification by magnifying endoscopy with blue laser imaging (ME-BLI) and with ME-NBI.

Patients and methods We retrospectively assessed consecutive patients diagnosed per the JNET classification by ME-BLI (BLI group) or ME-NBI (NBI group) between March 2014 and June 2017. We compared the diagnostic value of JNET classification between the groups with one-to-one propensity score matching.

Results Four hundred and seventy-one propensity score-matched pairs of lesions were analyzed. In the BLI and NBI groups, the overall diagnostic accuracies were 92.1 % and 91.7 %, respectively, and those for differentiating between neoplastic and non-neoplastic polyps were 96.6 % and 96.8 %, respectively. The positive predictive value by each JNET classification in BLI vs. NBI group was 90.6 % vs. 96.2 % in Type 1, 94.3 % vs. 94.6 % in Type 2A, 57.7 % vs. 42.3 % in Type 2B, and 100 % vs. 91.7 % in Type 3. The negative predictive value was 97.0 % vs. 96.9 % in Type 1, 88.1 % vs. 82.8 % in Type 2A, 98.0 % vs. 98.2 % in Type 2B, and 98.5 % vs. 98.7 % in Type 3. No statistical difference in the diagnostic results was found between the groups.

Conclusions The diagnostic ability of the JNET classification by ME-BLI and ME-NBI was comparable, with the former also applicable for diagnosis of colorectal lesions.



Publication History

Received: 28 August 2020

Accepted: 19 October 2020

Article published online:
03 February 2021

© 2021. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commecial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany