CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Ultrasound Int Open 2020; 06(03): E67-E75
DOI: 10.1055/a-1323-4906
Review

Focal Autoimmune Pancreatitis: A Simple Flow Chart for a Challenging Diagnosis

Clara Benedetta Conti
1   Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, ASST Cremona, Cremona, Italy
,
Fabrizio Cereatti
1   Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, ASST Cremona, Cremona, Italy
,
Andrea Drago
1   Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, ASST Cremona, Cremona, Italy
,
Roberto Grassia
1   Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, ASST Cremona, Cremona, Italy
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Autoimmune pancreatitis is a chronic fibroinflammatory autoimmune mediated disease of the pancreas. Clinically, obstructive painless jaundice and upper abdominal pain are the main symptoms. Focal AIP is characterized by segmental involvement of pancreatic parenchyma and it is often radiologically represented by a pancreatic mass. In these cases, the diagnosis can be very challenging, since it may be easily confused with pancreatic cancer. Therefore, we suggest a combined approach of imaging tests as the diagnostic workup. EUS study combined with CEUS and elastography, if available, increases the accuracy of the method to rule out cancer. Moreover, the lesion should always be sampled under EUS guidance to obtain a cyto/histological diagnosis. The diagnostic workup should also include the use of diagnostic clinical criteria (extrapancreatic lesions, steroid response) and laboratory findings (CA 19.9 and IgG4 evaluations).



Publication History

Received: 15 September 2020

Accepted after revision: 25 November 2020

Article published online:
19 January 2021

© 2021. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 
  • References

  • 1 Members of the Criteria Committee for Autoimmune Pancreatitis of the Japan Pancreas Society Diagnostic criteria for autoimmune pancreatitis by the Japan Pancreas Society (2002). J Jpn Pancreas Soc (Suizou) 2002; 17: 585-587
  • 2 Chari ST, Takahashi N, Levy MJ. et al. A diagnostic strategy to distinguish autoimmune pancreatitis from pancreatic cancer. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2009; 7: 1097-03 PMID:19410017
  • 3 Kwon S, Kim MH, Choi EK. The diagnostic criteria for autoimmune chronic pancreatitis: it is time to make a consensus. Pancreas 2007; 34: 279-286 PMID: 17414049
  • 4 Otsuki M, Chung JB, Okazaki K. et al. Asian diagnostic criteria for autoimmune pancreatitis: consensus of the Japan-Korea Symposium on Autoimmune Pancreatitis. J Gastroenterol 2008; 43: 403-408 PMID: 18600383
  • 5 Schneider A, Lohr JM. [Autoimmune pancreatitis]. Internist (Berl) 2009; 50: 318-330 PMID: 19212732
  • 6 Pearson RK, Longnecker DS, Chari ST. et al. Controversies in clinical pancreatology: autoimmune pancreatitis: does it exist?. Pancreas. 2003; 27: 1-13 PMID:12826899
  • 7 Shimosegawa T, Chari ST, Frulloni L. et al. “International consensus diagnostic criteria for autoimmune pancreatitis: Guidelines of the international association of pancreatology,”. Pancreas 2011; 3: 352-358 PMID: 21412117
  • 8 Okazaki K, Uchida K. Current concept of autoimmune pancreatitis and IgG4-related disease. Am J Gastroenterol 2018; 113: 1412-1416 PMID: 30002467
  • 9 Kamisawa T, Zen Y, Pillai S. et al. IgG4-related disease. The Lancet 2015; 385: 1460-1471 PMID: 25481618
  • 10 Okazaki K, Kawa S, Kamisawa T. et al. Japanese consensus guidelines for management of autoimmune pancreatitis: I. Concept and diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis. J Gastroenterol 2010; 45: 249-26 PMID: 20084528
  • 11 Wakabayashi T, Kawaura Y, Satomura Y. et al. Clinical and imaging features of autoimmune pancreatitis with focal pancreatic swelling or mass formation: comparison with so-called tumor-forming pancreatitis and pancreatic carcinoma. Am J Gastroenterol 2003; 98: 2679-2687 PMID: 14687817
  • 12 Weber SM, Cubukcu-Dimopulo O, Palesty JA. et al. Lymphoplasmacytic sclerosing pancreatitis: inflammatory mimic of pancreatic carcinoma. J Gastrointest Surg 2003; 7: 129-137 PMID: 12559194
  • 13 Abraham SC, Wilentz RE, Yeo CJ. et al. Pancreaticoduodenectomy (Whipple resections) in patients without malignancy: Are they all ‘chronic pancreatitis’?. Am J Surg Pathol 2003; 27: 110-120 PMID: 12502933
  • 14 Kennedy T, Preczewski L, Stocker SJ. et al. Bell et al. Incidence of benign inflammatory disease in patients undergoing Whipple procedure for clinically suspected carcinoma: a single-institution experience. Am J Surg 2006; 191: 437-441 PMID: 16490563
  • 15 Hurtuk MG, Shoup M, Oshima K. et al. Pancreaticoduodenectomies in patients without periampullary neoplasms: lesions that masquerade as cancer. Am J Surg 2010; 199: 372-376 PMID: 20226913
  • 16 De la Fuente SG, Ceppa EP, Reddy SK. et al. Incidence of benign disease in patients that underwent resection for presumed pancreatic cancer diagnosed by endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) and fine-needle aspiration (FNA). J Gastrointest Surg 2010; 14: 1139-1142 PMID: 20424928
  • 17 Frulloni L, Amodio A, Katsotourchi AM. et al. A practical approach to the diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis. World J Gastroenterol 2011; 17: 2076-2079 PMID: 21547125
  • 18 Dite P, Novotny I, Dvorackova J. et al. Pancreatic solid focal lesions: differential diagnosis between autoimmune pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer. Dig Dis 2019; 37: 416-442 PMID: 31079114
  • 19 Chang MC, Liang PC, Jan S. et al. Increase diagnostic accuracy in differentiating focal type autoimmune pancreatitis from pancreatic cancer with combined serum IgG4 and CA19-9 levels. Pancreatology 2014; 14: 366-372 PMID: 25278306
  • 20 Sharma C, Eltawil KM, Renfrew PD. et al. Advances in diagnosis, treatment and palliation of pancreatic carcinoma: 1990–2010. World J Gastroenterol 2011; 17: 867-897
  • 21 Kanno A, Masamune A, Hanada K. et al. Multicenter study of early pancreatic cancer in Japan. Pancreatology 2018; 18: 61-67 DOI: 10.1016/j.pan.2017.11.007.
  • 22 Ashida R, Tanaka S, Yamanaka H. et al. The role of transabdominal ultrasound in the diagnosis of early stage pancreatic cancer: Review and Single-Center Experience. Diagnostics (Basel) 2018; 9: 2 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics9010002. PMID: 30587766.
  • 23 D’Onofrio M, De Robertis R, Crosara S. et al. Acoustic radiation force impulse with shear wave speed quantification of pancreatic masses: A prospective study. Pancreatology 2016; 16: 106-109
  • 24 Park MK, Jo J, Kwon H. et al. Usefulness of acoustic radiation force impulse elastography in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant solid pancreatic lesions. Ultrasonography 2014; 33: 26-33 DOI: 10.14366/usg.13017.
  • 25 Furuhashi N, Suzuki K, Sakurai Y. et al. Differentiation of focal-type autoimmune pancreatitis from pancreatic carcinoma: assessment by multiphase contrast-enhanced CT. Eur Radiol 2015; 25: 1366-1374 PMID: 25433412
  • 26 Held L. A nomogram for P values. BMC Med Res Methodol 2010; 10: 21 PMID: 20233437
  • 27 Zaheer A, Singh VK, Akshintala VS. et al. Differentiating autoimmune pancreatitis from pancreatic adenocarcinoma using dual-phase computed tomography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2014; 38: 146-155 PMID: 24424563
  • 28 Zhang J, Jia G, Zuo C. et al. 18F- FDG PET/CT helps differentiate autoimmune pancreatitis from pancreatic cancer. BMC Cancer 2017; 17: 695 PMID: 29061130
  • 29 Matsumoto I, Shirakawa S, Shinzeki M. et al. 18-Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography does not aid in diagnosis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2013; 11: 712-718 PMID: 23353642
  • 30 Gu X, Liu R. Application of 18F-FDG PET/CT combined with carbohydrate antigen 19-9 for differentiating pancreatic carcinoma from chronic mass-forming pancreatitis in Chinese elderly. Clin Interv Aging 2016; 11: 1365-1370 PMID: 27729779
  • 31 Kwon JH, Kim JH, Kim SY. et al. Differentiating focal autoimmune pancreatitis and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: contrast-enhanced MRI with special emphasis on the arterial phase. Eur Radiol 2019; 29: 5763-5771 PMID: 31028441
  • 32 Sun GF, Zuo CJ, Shao CW. et al. Focal autoimmune pancreatitis: radiological characteristics help to distinguish from pancreatic cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2013; 19: 3634-3641 PMID: 23801866
  • 33 Jang KM, Kim SH, Kim YK. et al. Missed pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: Assessment of early imaging findings on prediagnostic magnetic resonance imaging. Eur J Radiol 2015; 84: 1473-1479 PMID: 26032128
  • 34 Lee JH, Min JH, Kim YK. et al. Usefulness of non-contrast MR imaging in distinguishing pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma from focal pancreatitis. Clin Imaging 2019; 55: 132-139 PMID: 30818163
  • 35 De Lisi S, Buscarini E, Arcidiacono PG. et al. Endoscopic ultrasonography findings in autoimmune pancreatitis: be aware of the ambiguous features and look for the pivotal ones. JOP 2010; 11: 78-84 PMID: 20065561
  • 36 Rösch T, Lorenz R, Braig C. et al. Endoscopic ultrasound in pancreatic tumor diagnosis. Gastrointest Endosc 1991; 37: 347-352 PMID: 2070987
  • 37 Dumonceau JM, Deprez PH, Jenssen C. et al. Indications, results, and clinical impact of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided sampling in gastroenterology: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Clinical Guideline - Updated January 2017. Endoscopy 2017; 49: 695-714 PMID: 28511234
  • 38 Chen G, Liu S, Zhao Y. et al. Diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration for pancreatic cancer: a meta-analysis. Pancreatology 2013; 13: 298-304 PMID: 23719604
  • 39 Klapman JB, Logrono R, Dye CE. et al. Clinical impact of on-site cytopathology interpretation on endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration. Am J Gastroenterol 2003; 98: 1289-1294 PMID: 12818271
  • 40 Conti CB, Cereatti F, Grassia R. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid pancreatic masses: the fine needle aspiration or fine needle biopsy dilemma. Is the best needle yet to come?. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2019; 11: 454-471 PMID: 31523377
  • 41 Levy MJ, Wiersema MJ, Chari ST. Chronic pancreatitis: focal pancreatitis or cancer? Is there a role for FNA/biopsy? Autoimmune pancreatitis. Endoscopy. 2006; 38: S30-S35 PMID: 16802220
  • 42 Grassia R, Imperatore N, Capone P. et al. EUS-guided tissue acquisition in chronic pancreatitis: Differential diagnosis between pancreatic cancer and pseudotumoral masses using EUS-FNA or core biopsy. Endoscopic. Ultrasound 2020; 9: 122-129
  • 43 Dong Y, D’Onofrio M, Hocke M. et al. Autoimmune pancreatitis: Imaging features. Endosc Ultrasound 2018; 7: 196-203 PMID: 28836516
  • 44 Cho MK, Moon SH, Song TJ. et al. Contrast-Enhanced Endoscopic Ultrasound for Differentially Diagnosing Autoimmune Pancreatitis and Pancreatic Cancer. Gut Liver 2018; 12: 591-596 PMID: 29699060
  • 45 Vitali F, Pfeifer L, Janson C. et al. Quantitative perfusion analysis in pancreatic contrast enhanced ultrasound (DCE-US): A promising tool for the differentiation between autoimmune pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer. Z Gastroenterol 2015; 53: 1175-1181 PMID 26480053
  • 46 Dietrich CF, Hocke M. Elastography of the pancreas. Current viewClin Endosc 2019; 52: 533-540 Doi: 10.5946/ce.2018.156
  • 47 Dyrla P, Gil J, Niemczyk S. et al. Elastography in the Diagnosis of Pancreatic Malignancies. Adv Exp Med Biol 2019; 1133: 41-48 PMID:30443726
  • 48 Okasha HH, Mahdy RE, Elkholy S. et al. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) elastography and strain ratio, could it help in differentiating malignant from benign pancreatic lesions?. Medicine (Baltimore) 2018; 97: e11689 PMID: 30200064
  • 49 Okasha H, Elkholy S, El-Sayed R. et al. Real time endoscopic ultrasound elastography an strain ratio in the diagnosis of solid pancreatic lesions. World J Gastroenterol 2017; 23: 5962-5968 PMID: 28932088
  • 50 Lu Y, Chen L, Li C. et al. Diagnostic utility of endoscopic ultrasonography-elastography in the evaluation of solid pancreatic masses: A meta-analysis and systematic review. Med Ultrason 2017; 19: 150-158 PMID: 28440348