Download PDF
Zahnmedizin up2date 2020; 14(06): 467-483
DOI: 10.1055/a-1307-7178
Zahnerhaltung, Prävention und Restauration

Adhäsivbrücken als Therapieoptionen zum minimalinvasiven Lückenschluss

Andreas Zenthöfer
,
Cornelia Frese
,
Wolfgang Bömicke
› Further Information
Also available at
   Permissions and Reprints All articles of this category

In diesem Artikel werden Adhäsivbrücken als minimalinvasive Therapieoptionen zur Versorgung von Einzelzahnlücken aus dem Spektrum der Zahnerhaltung sowie der zahnärztlichen Prothetik gegenübergestellt und Indikationsbereiche aufgezeigt. Die genannten Vorgehensweisen geben Einblick in die vielfältigen Einsatzgebiete der Adhäsivbrücken und ermöglichen es, patientenzentrierte Versorgungskonzepte zum Lückenschluss in der Praxis anzubieten.

Publication History

Article published online:
11 December 2020

© 2020. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Pjetursson BE, Brägger U, Lang NP. et al. Comparison of survival and complication rates of tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) and implant-supported FDPs and single crowns (SCs). Clin Oral Implants Res 2007; 18 Suppl 3: 97-113
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Kuijs R, van Dalen A, Roeters J. et al. The Resin-Bonded Fixed Partial Denture as the First Treatment Consideration to Replace a Missing Tooth. Int J Prosthodont 2016; 29: 337-339
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Kern M. Single-retainer resin-bonded fixed dental prostheses as an alternative to orthodontic space closure (and to single-tooth implants). Quintessence Int 2018; 49: 789-798
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Kullar AS, Miller CS. Are There Contraindications for Placing Dental Implants?. Dent Clin North Am 2019; 63: 345-362
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Muller F, Salem K, Barbezat C. et al. Knowledge and attitude of elderly persons towards dental implants. Gerodontology 2012; 29: e914-e923
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Augusti D, Augusti G, Re D. Prosthetic restoration in the single-tooth gap: patient preferences and analysis of the WTP index. Clin Oral Implants Res 2014; 25: 1257-1264
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Edelhoff D, Sorensen JA. Tooth structure removal associated with various preparation designs for posterior teeth. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2002; 22: 241-249
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Schwindling FS, Waldecker M, Rammelsberg P. et al. Tooth substance removal for ceramic single crown materials-an in vitro comparison. Clin Oral Investig 2019; 23: 3359-3366
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Rochette AL. Attachment of a splint to enamel of lower anterior teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1973; 30: 418-423
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Howe DF, Denehy GE. Anterior fixed partial dentures utilizing the acid-etch technique and a cast metal framework. J Prosthet Dent 1977; 37: 28-31
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Thompson VP, Livaditis GJ. Etched casting acid etch composite bonded posterior bridges. Pediatr Dent 1982; 4: 38-43
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Behr M, Leibrock A, Stich W. et al. Adhesive-fixed partial dentures in anterior and posterior areas. Results of an on-going prospective study begun in 1985. Clin Oral Investig 1998; 2: 31-35
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Thoma DS, Sailer I, Ioannidis A. et al. A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of resin-bonded fixed dental prostheses after a mean observation period of at least 5 years. Clin Oral Implants Res 2017; 28: 1421-1432
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Balasubramaniam GR. Predictability of resin bonded bridges – a systematic review. Br Dent J 2017; 222: 849-858
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Yoshida T, Kurosaki Y, Mine A. et al. Fifteen-year survival of resin-bonded vs. full-coverage fixed dental prostheses. J Prosthodont Res 2019; 63: 374-382
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Alraheam IA, Ngoc CN, Wiesen CA. et al. Five-year success rate of resin-bonded fixed partial dentures: A systematic review. J Esthet Restor Dent 2019; 31: 40-50
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Chaar MS, Passia N, Kern M. All-ceramic inlay-retained fixed dental prostheses: An update. Quintessence Int 2015; 46: 781-788
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Pospiech P, Rammelsberg P, Unsöld F. A new design for all-ceramic resin-bonded fixed partial dentures. Quintessence Int 1996; 27: 753-758
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Kern M, Passia N, Sasse M. et al. Ten-year outcome of zirconia ceramic cantilever resin-bonded fixed dental prostheses and the influence of the reasons for missing incisors. J Dent 2017; 65: 51-55
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Abou Tara M, Eschbach S, Wolfart S. et al. Zirconia ceramic inlay-retained fixed dental prostheses – first clinical results with a new design. J Dent 2011; 39: 208-211
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Staehle HJ. Lowtech-Dentistry – Bewährte und neue frugale Interventionen in der Zahnmedizin. Zahnärztl Mitt 2019; 109: 1081-1096
    Google Scholar
  • 22 Staehle HJ. Frugale Innovationen in der Zahnmedizin. Zahnmedizin up2date 2016; 10: 197-198
    Article in Thieme ConnectGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Freilich MA. Fiber-reinforced Composites in clinical Dentistry. Chicago: Quintessence Publishing Co; 2001
    Google Scholar
  • 24 Proctor BA. Composite Material I: Fibre reinforced composite Materials: An introductory Review. Lathom, Ormskirk, Lancashire: Pilkington Research and Development Laboratories; 1976: 63-75
    Google Scholar
  • 25 Smith DC. Recent developments and prospects in dental polymers. J Prosthet Dent 1962; 12: 1066-1078
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Frese C, Staehle HJ, Wolff D. Faserverstärkte Komposite – Materialspezifische Eigenschaften und klinische Einsatzmöglichkeiten. wissen kompakt 2015; 9: 179-188
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Vallittu PK, Shinya A, Baraba A. et al. Fiber-reinforced composites in fixed prosthodontics-Quo vadis?. Dent Mater 2017; 33: 877-879
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Frese C. Glasfaserverstärkte Restaurationen. Zahnärztl Mitt 2020; 110: 48-56
    Google Scholar
  • 29 Wolff D, Wohlrab T, Saure D. et al. Fiber-reinforced composite fixed dental prostheses: A 4-year prospective clinical trial evaluating survival, quality, and effects on surrounding periodontal tissues. J Prosthet Dent 2018; 119: 47-52
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Boemicke W, Kappel S, Stober T. et al. Clinical comparison of metal ceramic resin-bonded fixed dental prostheses with a conventional and a mixed retainer design. J Prosthet Dent 2014; 112: 472-480
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Frese C, Staehle HJ. Wie invasiv ist minimalinvasiv? – Management von Einzelzahnlücken aus konservierender Sicht. Der Freie Zahnarzt 2018; 4: 252-259
    Google Scholar
  • 32 Audenino G, Giannella G, Morello GM. et al. Resin-bonded fixed partial dentures: ten-year follow-up. Int J Prosthodont 2006; 19: 22-23
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Kern M, Wegner SM. Bonding to zirconia ceramic: adhesion methods and their durability. Dent Mater 1998; 14: 64-71
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Tzanakakis EG, Tzoutzas IG, Koidis PT. Is there a potential for durable adhesion to zirconia restorations? A systematic review. J Prosthet Dent 2016; 115: 9-19
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Chen J, Cai H, Ren X. et al. A Systematic Review of the Survival and Complication Rates of All-Ceramic Resin-Bonded Fixed Dental Prostheses. J Prosthodont 2018; 27: 535-543
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Lang NP, Pjetursson BE, Tan K. et al. A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of fixed partial dentures (FPDs) after an observation period of at least 5 years. II. Combined tooth-implant-supported FPDs. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004; 15: 643-653
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Bömicke W, Schürz A, Krisam J. et al. Durability of Resin-Zirconia Bonds Produced Using Methods Available in Dental Practice. J Adhes Dent 2016; 18: 17-27
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Bömicke W, Rathmann F, Pilz M. et al. Clinical Performance of Posterior Inlay-Retained and Wing-Retained Monolithic Zirconia Resin-Bonded Fixed Partial Dentures: Stage One Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial. J Prosthodont 2020; DOI: 10.1111/jopr.13258.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Kern M. Bonding to oxide ceramics–laboratory testing versus clinical outcome. Dent Mater 2015; 31: 8-14
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Wolff D, Schach C, Kraus T. Faserverstärkte Kompositbrücken. Zahnmedizin up2date 2009; 2: 55-78
    Article in Thieme ConnectGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Wolff D, Geiger S, Ding P. et al. Analysis of the interdiffusion of resin monomers into pre-polymerized fiber-reinforced composites. Dent Mater 2012; 28: 541-547
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Frese C, Decker C, Rebholz J. et al. Original and repair bond strength of fiber-reinforced composites in vitro. Dent Mater 2014; 30: 456-462
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Yokoyama D, Shinya A, Lassila LV. et al. Framework design of an anterior fiber-reinforced hybrid composite fixed partial denture: a 3D finite element study. Int J Prosthodont 2009; 22: 405-412
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Frese C, Schiller P, Staehle HJ. et al. Fiber-reinforced composite fixed dental prostheses in the anterior area: a 4.5-year follow-up. J Prosthet Dent 2014; 112: 143-149
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Wolff D, Schach C, Kraus T. et al. Fiber-reinforced composite fixed dental prostheses: a retrospective clinical examination. J Adhes Dent 2011; 13: 187-194
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Rathmann F, Bömicke W, Rammelsberg P. et al. Veneered zirconia inlay-retained fixed dental prostheses: 10-Year results from a prospective clinical study. J Dent 2017; 64: 68-72
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Chaar MS, Kern M. Five-year clinical outcome of posterior zirconia ceramic inlay-retained FDPs with a modified design. J Dent 2015; 43: 1411-1415
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar