Rofo 2021; 193(05): 521-526
DOI: 10.1055/a-1275-0984
Review

The Ductus Venosus

Article in several languages: English | deutsch
Markus Born
Department of Radiology, Division of Pediatric Radiology, University Hospital Bonn, Germany
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Background the ductus venosus (DV) is not well known in general radiology, but it plays a role in the daily work of pediatric radiologists. Consequently all general radiologists who also care for a pediatric department should be familiar with the physiological and pathological findings related to the DV. Methods: Literature research in Medline, using the keywords “ductus venosus” and “umbilical vein catheter”.

Results and conclusions In the first weeks of life the DV is regularly still patent. It should be recognized as DV and not be mistaken for a pathological portosystemic shunt.The ductus venosus is the lead structure for umbilical vein catheters. Radiologists should be able to assess the correct catheter position. Radiologically important findings of an umbilical vein catheter are mainly malposition and intrahepatic extravasation. Agenesis of the DV can lead to intra- or extrahepatic compensatory portosystemic shunts, in which as well as in the case of persistent patency of the DV, there may be the necessity for radiological-interventional or surgical occlusion.

Key points:

  • In the first weeks of life in infants the Ductus venosus is regularly still patent.

  • The Ductus venosus should not be mistaken for a pathological portosystemic shunt.

  • An umbilcal vein catheter should project onto the Ductus venosus and end caudal to the right atrium.

  • Intrahepatic portosystemic shunts in DV agenesis show a high rate of spontaneous closure postnatally.

Citation Format

  • Born M. The Ductus Venosus. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2021; 193: 521 – 526



Publication History

Received: 11 May 2020

Accepted: 18 September 2020

Article published online:
05 November 2020

© 2020. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 
  • Literatur

  • 1 Haugen G, Kiserud T, Godfrey K. et al Portal and umbilical venous blood supply to the liver in the human fetus near term. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2004; 24: 599-605
  • 2 Strizek B, Zamprakou A, Gottschalk I. et al Prenatal Diagnosis of Agenesis of Ductus Venosus: A Retrospective Study of Anatomic Variants, Associated Anomalies and Impact on Postnatal Outcome. Ultraschall in Med 2019; 40 (03) 333-339 DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-115109.
  • 3 Kiserud T. Hemodynamics of the ductus venosus. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1999; 84 (02) 139-147
  • 4 Morton S, Brodsky D. Fetal Physiology and the Transition to Extrauterine Life. Clin Perinatol 2016; 43 (03) 395-407
  • 5 Fugelseth D, Lindemann R, Liestøl K. et al Ultrasonographic study of ductus venosus in healthy neonates. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 1997; 77 (02) F131-F134
  • 6 Loberant N, Barak M, Gaitini D. et al Closure of the ductus venosus in neonates: findings on real-time gray-scale, color-flow Doppler, and duplex Doppler sonography. Am J Roentgenol 1992; 159 (05) 1083-1085
  • 7 Kondo M, Itoh S, Kunikata T. et al Time of closure of ductus venosus in term and preterm neonates. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2001; 85 (01) F57-F59
  • 8 Fugelseth D, Lindemann R, Liestøl K. et al Postnatal closure of ductus venosus in preterm infants < or = 32 weeks. An ultrasonographic study. Early Hum Dev 1998; 53 (02) 163-169
  • 9 Schlesinger AE, Braverman RM, DiPietro MA. Pictorial essay. Neonates and umbilical venous catheters: normal appearance, anomalous positions, complications, and potential aid to diagnosis. Am J Roentgenol 2003; 180 (04) 1147-1153
  • 10 Selvam S, Humphrey T, Woodley H. et al Sonographic features of umbilical catheter-related complications. Pediatr Radiol 2018; 48 (13) 1964-1970 DOI: 10.1007/s00247-018-4214-9.
  • 11 Derinkuyu BE, Boyunaga OL, Damar C. et al Hepatic Complications of Umbilical Venous Catheters in the Neonatal Perid: The Ultrasound Spectrum. J Ultrasound Med 2018; 37 (06) 1335-1344 DOI: 10.1002/jum.14443.
  • 12 Hoellering A, Tshamala D, Davies MW. Study of movement of umbilical venous catheters over time. J Paediatr Child Health 2018; 54 (12) 1329-1335. doi:10.1111/jpc.14073.o
  • 13 Franta J, Harabor A, Soraisham AS. Ultrasound assessment of umbilical venous catheter migration in preterm infants: a prospective study. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2017; 102 (03) F251-F255 DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2016-311202.
  • 14 Grizelj R, Vukovic J, Bojanic K. et al Severe liver injury while using umbilical venous catheter: case series and literature review. Am J Perinatol 2014; 31 (11) 965-974 DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1370346.
  • 15 Pegu S, Murthy P. Ascites with hepatic extravasation of total parenteral nutrition (TPN) secondary to umbilical venous catheter (UVC) malposition in an extremely preterm baby. BMJ Case Rep 2018; 2018 DOI: 10.1136/bcr-2018-22637.
  • 16 Hartley M, Ruppa Mohanram G, Ahmed I. TPNoma: an unusual complication of umbilical venous catheter malposition. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2019; 104 (03) F326 DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2018-315960.
  • 17 Kanto WP, Parrish RA. Perforation of the peritoneum and intra-abdominal hemorrhage: A complication of umbilicalvein catheterizations. Am J Dis Child 1977; 131: 1102-1103
  • 18 Kim JH, Lee YS, Kim SH. et al Does umbilical vein catheterization lead to portal venous thrombosis? Prospective US evaluation in 100 neonates. Radiology 2001; 219 (03) 645-650
  • 19 Saha B, Saha AK. Distal Migration and Successful Retrieval of a Broken Umbilical Venous Catheter in a Neonate. Indian Pediatr 2019; 56 (02) 149
  • 20 Akın A, Bilici M, Demir F. et al Percutaneous retrieval of umbilical vein catheter fragment in an infant two months after embolization. Turk J Pediatr 2018; 60 (02) 191-193 DOI: 10.24953/turkjped.2018.02.012.
  • 21 Varan B, Yakut K, Harman A. Transcatheter retrieval of embolized catheter using venovenous loop in a neonate. Turk J Pediatr 2018; 60 (01) 113-115 DOI: 10.24953/turkjped.2018.01.020.
  • 22 Bernard O, Franchi-Abella S, Branchereau S. et al Congenital portosystemic shunts in children: recognition, evaluation, and management. Semin Liver Dis 2012; 32 (04) 273-287 DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1329896.
  • 23 Morgan G, Superina R. Congenital absence of the portal vein: two cases and a proposed classification system for portasystemic vascular anomalies. J Pediatr Surg 1994; 29 (09) 1239-1241
  • 24 Han BH, Park SB, Song MJ. et al Congenital portosystemic shunts: prenatal manifestations with postnatal confirmation and follow-up. J Ultrasound Med 2013; 32 (01) 45-52
  • 25 Paganelli M, Lipsich JE, Sciveres M. et al Predisposing Factors for Spontaneous Closure of Congenital Portosystemic Shunts. The Journal of Pediatrics 2015; 167 (04) 931-935
  • 26 Francois B, Gottrand F, Lachaux A. et al Outcome of intrahepatic portosystemic shunt diagnosed prenatally. Eur J Pediatr 2017; 176 (12) 1613-1618 DOI: 10.1007/s00431-017-3013-x.
  • 27 Poeppelman RS, Tobias JD. Patent Ductus Venosus and Congenital Heart Disease: A Case Report and Review. Cardiol Res 2018; 9 (05) 330-333 DOI: 10.14740/cr777w.
  • 28 Kamali L, Moradi M, Ebrahimian S. et al Patent ductus venosus in an infant with direct hyperbilirubinemia. Clin Case Rep 2019; 7 (07) 1430-1434 DOI: 10.1002/ccr3.2266.
  • 29 Ikeda S, Yamaguchi Y, Sera Y. et al Surgical correction of patent ductus venosus in three brothers. Dig Dis Sci 1999; 44 (03) 582-589
  • 30 Yoshimoto Y, Shimizu R, Saeki T. et al Patent ductus venosus in children: a case report and review of the literature. J Pediatr Surg 2004; 39 (01) E1-E5
  • 31 Perini MV, Starkey GM, Goh SK. et al Laparoscopic treatment of a patent ductus venosus and the use of indocyanine green to monitor perioperative hepatic function. J Surg Case Rep 2018; 2018 (02) rjy026 DOI: 10.1093/jscr/rjy026.