PDF herunterladen
ZWR - Das Deutsche Zahnärzteblatt 2020; 129(10): 491-502
DOI: 10.1055/a-1271-9801
Fortbildung
Endodontologie

Der Stift im Wurzelkanal – differenzialtherapeutische Überlegungen

Ralf Krug
,
Gabriel Krastl
› Weitere Informationen
Auch verfügbar auf
    Lizenzen und Reprints

Wurzelkanalbehandelte Zähne wurden oftmals „reflexartig“ aus vermeintlichen Stabilisierungsgründen mit einem Stift restauriert. In der restaurativen Zahnheilkunde gibt es zahlreiche Möglichkeiten, die den Stift im Wurzelkanal bedingen oder relativieren können. Ziel der hier vorgestellten differenzialtherapeutischen Aspekte ist es, dass wurzelkanalbehandelte Zähne – bei korrekter Indikation oftmals auch ohne Stift – langfristig restauriert werden können.

Schlüsselwörter

Wurzelkanal - Stiftversorgung - Teilüberkronung - Extrusion - Ferrule-Design


Publikationsverlauf

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
21. Oktober 2020

© 2020. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Naumann M, Schmitter M, Frankenberger R. et al. “Ferrule comes first. Post is second!” Fake news and alternative facts? A systematic review. J Endod 2018; 44: 212-219
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Edelhoff D, Heidemann D, Kern M. et al. Aufbau endodontisch behandelter Zähne. Gemeinsame Stellungnahme der DGZMK, der DGZPW und der DGZ. Dt Zahn Z 2003; 58: 199
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Bitter K, Noetzel J, Stamm O. et al. Randomized clinical trial comparing the effects of post placement on failure rate of postendodontic restorations: Preliminary results of a mean period of 32 months. J Endod 2009; 35: 1477-1482
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 von Stein-Lausnitz M, Bruhnke M, Rosentritt M. et al. Direct restoration of endodontically treated maxillary central incisors: Post or no post at all?. Clin Oral Investig 2019; 23: 381-389
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Krishan R, Paque F, Ossareh A. Impacts of conservative endodontic cavity on root canal instrumentation efficacy and resistance to fracture assessed in incisors, premolars, and molars. J Endod 2014; 40: 1160-1166
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Plotino G, Grande NM, Isufi A. et al. Fracture strength of endodontically treated teeth with different access cavity designs. J Endod 2017; 43: 995-1000
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Azim AA, Griggs JA, Huang GT. The Tennessee study: factors affecting treatment outcome and healing time following nonsurgical root canal treatment. Int Endod J 2016; 49: 6-16
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Moreira DM, Almeida JFA, Ferraz CCR. et al. Structural analysis of bovine root dentin after use of different endodontics auxiliary chemical substances. J Endod 2009; 35: 1023-1027
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Farina AP, Cecchin D, Barbizam JV. et al. Influence of endodontic irrigants on bond strength of a self-etching adhesive. Austr End J 2011; 37: 26-30
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Morris MD, Lee KW, Agee KA. et al. Effects of sodium hypochlorite and rc-prep on bond strengths of resin cement to endodontic surfaces. J Endod 2001; 27: 753-757
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Santos JN, Carrilho MR, De Goes MF. et al. Effect of chemical irrigants on the bond strength of a self-etching adhesive to pulp chamber dentin. J Endod 2006; 32: 1088-1090
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Violich DR, Chandler NP. The smear layer in endodontics – a review. Int Endod J 2010; 43: 2-15
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Bitter K, Eirich W, Neumann K. et al. Effect of cleaning method, luting agent and preparation procedure on the retention of fibre posts. Int Endod J 2012; 45: 1116-1126
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Bitter K, Perdigao J, Exner M. et al. Reliability of fibre post bonding to root canal dentin after simulated clinical function in vitro. Oper Dent 2012; 37: 397-405
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Juloski J, Radovic I, Goracci C. et al. Ferrule effect: A literature review. J End 2012; 38: 11-19
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Schmitter M, Sterzenbach G, Faggion CM. et al. A flood tide of systematic reviews on endodontic posts: Methodological assessment using of r-amstar. Clin Oral Inv 2013; 17: 1287-1294
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Duret B, Reynaud M, Duret F. [A new concept of corono-radicular reconstruction, the Composipost (2)]. Chir Dent Fr 1990; 60: 69-77
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Sterzenbach G, Franke A, Naumann M. Rigid versus flexible dentine-like endodontic posts-clinical testing of a biomechanical concept: Seven-year results of a randomized controlled clinical pilot trial on endodontically treated abutment teeth with severe hard tissue loss. J Endod 2012; 38: 1557-1563
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Naumann M, Sterzenbach G, Dietrich T. et al. Dentin-like versus rigid endodontic post: 11-year randomized controlled pilot trial on no-wall to 2-wall defects. J Endod 2017; 43: 1770-1775
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Figueiredo FE, Martins-Filho PR, Faria ESAL. Do metal post-retained restorations result in more root fractures than fibre post-retained restorations? A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Endod 2015; 41: 309-316
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Bitter K, Kielbassa AM. Post-endodontic restorations with adhesively luted fibre-reinforced composite post systems: A review. Am J Dent 2007; 20: 353-360
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Krastl G, Zitzmann NU, Weiger R. Adhäsivaufbau bei wurzelkanalgefüllten Zähnen. Zahnmed up2date 2008; 4: 323-346
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Naumann M, Blankenstein F, Kiessling S. et al. Risk factors for failure of glass fibre-reinforced composite post restorations: A prospective observational clinical study. Eur J Oral Sci 2005; 113: 519-524
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Naumann M, Koelpin M, Beuer F. et al. 10-year survival evaluation for glass-fibre-supported postendodontic restoration: A prospective observational clinical study. J Endod 2012; 38: 432-435
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Costa RG, De Morais EC, Campos EA. et al. Customized fibre glass posts. Fatigue and fracture resistance. Am J Dent 2012; 25: 35-38
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Anchieta RB, Rocha EP, Almeida EO. et al. Influence of customized composite resin fibreglass posts on the mechanics of restored treated teeth. Int Endod J 2012; 45: 146-155
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Genovese K, Lamberti L, Pappalettere C. Finite element analysis of a new customized composite post system for endodontically treated teeth. J Biomech 2005; 38: 2375-2389
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Cagidiaco MC, Garcia-Godoy F, Vichi A. et al. Placement of fibre prefabricated or custom made posts affects the 3-year survival of endodontically treated premolars. Am J Dent 2008; 21: 179-184
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Ferrari M, Vichi A, Fadda GM. et al. A randomized controlled trial of endodontically treated and restored premolars. J Dent Res 2012; 91: 72-78
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Bergman B, Lundquist P, Sjogren U. et al. Restorative and endodontic results after treatment with cast posts and cores. J Prosth Dentistry 1989; 61: 10-15
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Jung RE, Kalkstein O, Sailer I. et al. A comparison of composite post buildups and cast gold post-and-core buildups for the restoration of nonvital teeth after 5 to 10 years. Int J Prosthodont 2007; 20: 63-69
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Sarkis-Onofre R, de Castilho Jacinto R, Boscato N. et al. Cast metal vs. Glass fibre posts: A randomized controlled trial with up to 3 years of follow up. J Dent 2014; 42: 582-587
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Cloet E, Debels E, Naert I. Controlled clinical trial on the outcome of glass fibre composite cores versus wrought posts and cast cores for the restoration of endodontically treated teeth: A 5-year follow-up study. Int J Prosthodont 2017; 30: 71-79
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Maccari PC, Cosme DC, Oshima HM. et al. Fracture strength of endodontically treated teeth with flared root canals and restored with different post systems. J Esthet Restor Dent 2007; 19: 30-36 discussion 37
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Heydecke G, Peters MC. The restoration of endodontically treated, single-rooted teeth with cast or direct posts and cores: A systematic review. J Prosth Dent 2002; 87: 380-386
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Schmitter M, Hamadi K, Rammelsberg P. Survival of two post systems–five-year results of a randomized clinical trial. Quintessence Int 2011; 42: 843-850
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Schmitter M, Lippenberger S, Rues S. et al. Fracture resistance of incisor teeth restored using fibre-reinforced posts and threaded metal posts: Effect of post length, location, pretreatment and cementation of the final restoration. Int Endod J 2010; 43: 436-442
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Rathke A, Haj-Omer D, Muche R. et al. Effectiveness of bonding fibre posts to root canals and composite core build-ups. Eur J Oral Sci 2009; 117: 604-610
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Bitter K, Perdigao J, Exner M. et al. Reliability of fibre post bonding to root canal dentin after simulated clinical function in vitro. Oper Dent 2012; 37: 397-405
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Goracci C, Ferrari M. Current perspectives on post systems: A literature review. Austr Dent J 2011; 56: 77-83
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Gu XH, Mao CY, Liang C. et al. Does endodontic post space irrigation affect smear layer removal and bonding effectiveness?. Eur J Oral Sci 2009; 117: 597-603
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Sarkis-Onofre R, Skupien JA, Cenci MS. et al. The role of resin cement on bond strength of glass-fibre posts luted into root canals: A systematic review and meta-analysis of in vitro studies. Oper Dent 2014; 39: E31-E44
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Bitter K, Schubert A, Neumann K. et al. Are self-adhesive resin cements suitable as core build-up materials? Analyses of maximum load capability, margin integrity, and physical properties. Clin Oral Inv 2016; 20: 1337-1345
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Lang H, Korkmaz Y, Schneider K. et al. Impact of endodontic treatments on the rigidity of the root. J Dent Res 2006; 85: 364-368
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Krastl G, Gugger J, Deyhle H. et al. Impact of adhesive surface and volume of luting resin on fracture resistance of root filled teeth. Int Endod J 2011; 44: 432-439
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Krastl G. Die postendodontische Restauration – Wurzelkanalstifte: wann und wie?. Endodontie 2005; 14: 129-142
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Junqueira RB, de Carvalho RF, Marinho CC. et al. Influence of glass fibre post length and remaining dentine thickness on the fracture resistance of root filled teeth. Int Endod J 2017; 50: 569-577
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Shu X, Mai QQ, Blatz M. et al. Direct and indirect restorations for endodontically treated teeth: A systematic review and meta-analysis, IAAD 2017 Consensus Conference Paper. J Adhes Dent 2018; 20: 183-194
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Dammaschke T, Nykiel K, Sagheri D. et al. Influence of coronal restorations on the fracture resistance of root canal-treated premolar and molar teeth: A retrospective study. Aust Endod J 2013; 39: 48-56
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Federlin M, Hiller KA, Schmalz G. Controlled, prospective clinical split-mouth study of cast gold vs. ceramic partial crowns: 5,5 year results. Am J Dent 2010; 23: 161-167
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 51 Naumann M, Schmitter M, Krastl G. Postendodontic restoration: Endodontic post-and-core or no post at all?. J Adh Dent 2018; 20: 19-24
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 52 Sedrez-Porto JA, Rosa WL, da Silva AF. et al. Endocrown restorations: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent 2016; 52: 8-14
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 53 Bindl A, Mormann WH. Clinical evaluation of adhesively placed cerec endo-crowns after 2 years – preliminary results. J Adh Dent 1999; 1: 255-265
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 54 Decerle N, Bessadet M, Munoz-Sanchez ML. et al. Evaluation of cerec endocrowns: A preliminary cohort study. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2014; 22: 89-95
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 55 Otto T. Computer-aided direct all-ceramic crowns: Preliminary 1-year results of a prospective clinical study. Int J Period Restor Dent 2004; 24: 446-455
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 56 Behring J, Cujé J, Hergt A. et al. Erhalt tief zerstörter Zähne – eine Entscheidungshilfe. Endodontie 2017; 26: 437-444
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 57 Goldberg PV, Higginbottom FL, Wilson TG. Periodontal considerations in restorative and implant therapy. Periodontol 2000 2001; 25: 100-109
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 58 Lanning SK, Waldrop TC, Gunsolley JC. et al. Surgical crown lengthening: Evaluation of the biological width. J Periodontol 2003; 74: 468-474
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar