Subscribe to RSS
The Effect of Anesthesia Type During Delivery on Neonatal Otoacoustic Emission Hearing Test Results: A Tertiary Center Experience
Background Hearing is essential for the healthy development of an infant as language is one of the main stimulants of intellectual capacity. We investigate the effect of anesthesia type during delivery on neonatal otoacoustic emission (OAE) hearing test results.
Methods This retrospective cross-sectional study includes 1,493 healthy, full-term (39/0–40/6 gestational weeks) newborns of healthy women and who were delivered by cesarean section. Newborns were divided into 2 groups based on their anesthesia type during delivery: 1) general anesthesia group (n=160), and 2) spinal anesthesia group (n=1333). Maternal age, anesthesia type, birth weight, gestational age at birth, neonatal gender, 1st–5th minute APGAR scores, and OAE results were compared between the groups.
Results 1287 (86.2%) newborns were reported to have passed the first step of OAE; 206 (13.8%) newborns were reported to have failed the first step and passed the second test. In the general anesthesia group, 133 (83.1%) of the newborns passed the first OAE test and 27 (16.9%) newborns had false-positive results. In the spinal anesthesia group, 1,154 (86.6%) of the newborns passed the first OAE test and 179 (13.4%) newborns had false-positive results. The difference between the 2 groups by false-positive values was found to be statistically significant (p<0.001).
Conclusions Type of delivery anesthesia may have an effect on the false-positive rates of OAE test results.
Received: 10 June 2020
Accepted after revision: 21 August 2020
29 September 2020 (online)
© 2020. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
- 1 Mukari SZ, Tan KY, Abdullah A. A pilot project on hospital-based universal newborn hearing screening: Lessons learned. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2006; 70: 843-851
- 2 Smolkin T, Mick O, Dabbah M. et al. Birth by cesarean delivery and failure on first otoacoustic emissions hearing test. Pediatrics 2012; 130: 95-100
- 3 Mohd K, Rafidah KN, Affizal A. et al. Anxiety of the mothers with referred baby during Universal Newborn Hearing Screening. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2011; 75: 513-517
- 4 Schwarz Y, Kaufman G, Daniel S. Newborn hearing screening failure and maternal factors during pregnancy. Int J Pediatric Otorhinolaryngol 2017; 103: 65-70
- 5 Dimitriou A, Perisanidis C, Chalkiadakis V. et al. The universal newborn hearing screening program in a public hospital: the importance of the day of examination. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2016; 91: 90-93
- 6 Smolkin T, Awawdeh S, Blazer S. et al. Delayed first otoacoustic emission test decreases failure on neonatal hearing screening after cesarean delivery. Acta Pediatr 2013; 102: 194-199
- 7 Güven S. The effect of mode of delivery on newborn hearing screening results. Turk Arch Otorhinolarnygol 2019; 57: 19-23
- 8 Sahin C, Terzioğlu U, Yiğit G. Sudden bilateral hearing loss after spinal anesthesia. J Laryngol Oto 2015; 129: 395-397
- 9 Vilhena D, Pereira L, Duarte D. et al. Sudden sensorineural hearing loss after orthopedic surgery under combined spinal and epidural anesthesia. Case Rep Otolaryngol 2016; 4295601. DOI: 10.1155/2016/4295601.
- 10 Schaffartzik W, Hirsch J, Frickmann F. et al. Hearing loss after spinal and general anesthesia: a comperative study. Anesth Analg 2000; 91: 1466-1472
- 11 Özdemir Ö, Tümkaya F. Yenidoğanda işitme tarama programı ve yönetimi. Türkiye Klinikleri. J Pediatr 2017; 26: 13-21
- 12 Bolat H, Bebitoğlu FG, Ozbaş S. et al. National newborn hearing screening program in Turkey: struggles and implementations between 2004 and 2008. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2009; 73: 1621-1623
- 13 Stueve MP, Rourk CO. Estimation of hearing loss in children: comparison of auditory steady state response and behavioral test methods. Am J Audiology 2003; 12: 125-136
- 14 Probst R, Lonsbury-Martin BL, Martin GK. A review of otoacoustic emissions. J Acoust Soc Am 1991; 89: 2027-2067
- 15 Farahani F, Hamidi NM, Seifrabiei MA. et al. The effect of mode of delivery and hospital type on newborn hearing screening results using otoacoustic emissions: based on screening age. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2017; 69: 1-5
- 16 Saitoh Y, Sakoda T, Hazama M. et al. Transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in newborn infants: effects of ear asymmetry, gender and age. J Otolaryngol 2006; 35: 133-138
- 17 Sato H, Sando J, Takahashi H. Sexual dimorphism and development of the human cochlea: computer 3-D measurement. Acta Otolaryngol 1991; 111: 1037-1040
- 18 Teixeira FM, Tomita S, de Lima MA. Evaluation of tympanometric alterations in patients subject to general anesthesia with nitrous oxide. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 2005; 71: 274-280
- 19 He YL, Seno H, Tsujimoto S. et al. The effects of uterine and umbilical blood flows on the transfer of propofol across the human placenta during in vitro perfusion. Anesth Analg 2001; 93: 151-156
- 20 Setoyama K, Shinzato T, Misumi K. et al. Effects of propofol-sevoflurane anesthesia on the maternal and fetal hemodynamics blood gases, and uterine activity in pregnant goats. J Vet Med Sci 2003; 65: 1075-1081
- 21 Huang B, Yan L, Zhang Z. et al. General anesthetic induced differential changes in latency of auditory evoked potential in the central nucleus of inferior colliculus of mouse. Neurosci Lett 2019; 708: 134325
- 22 Walsted A, Salomon G, Olsen KS. Low-frequency hearing loss after spinal anesthesia. Perilymphatic hypotonia?. Scand Audiol 1991; 20: 211-215
- 23 Fog J, Wang LP, Sundberg A. et al. Hearing loss after spinal anesthesia is related to needle size. Anesth Analg 1990; 70: 517-522
- 24 Solak S, Tulga T. Transient unilateral sudden hearing loss after spinal anesthesia. Agri 2019; 31: 50-52
- 25 Khoza-Shangaze K, Joubert K. The influence of epidural anesthesia on new-born hearing screening: a pilot study. J Pharm Bioallied Sci 2012; 4: 65