Download PDF
Aktuelle Urol 2020; 51(06): 572-581
DOI: 10.1055/a-1252-1780
Übersicht

Interdisziplinäre Empfehlungen zur Behandlung des fortgeschrittenen Nierenzellkarzinoms[*]

Interdisciplinary recommendations for the treatment of advanced metastatic renal cell carcinoma
Kurt Miller
1   Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Urologie, Berlin
,
Lothar Bergmann
2   Ambulantes Krebszentrum Schaubstraße (AKS), Frankfurt
,
Christian Doehn
3   Urologikum Lübeck, Urologikum Lübeck, Lübeck
,
Viktor Grünwald
4   Universität Duisburg-Essen, Urology, Essen
,
Jürgen E. Gschwend
5   Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Urology, München
,
Philipp Ivanyi
6   MHH, Urology, Hannover
,
Ulrich Keilholz
7   Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Berlin
,
Markus A. Kuczyk
8   Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Urology, Hannover
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Zusammenfassung

Die Prognose von Patienten mit metastasiertem Nierenzellkarzinom (mRCC) hat sich dank neuer Therapien deutlich verbessert. Überlebenszeiten von mehr als zweieinhalb Jahren sind realistisch. Immuntherapiekombinationen mit Checkpoint-Inhibitoren (CPI) oder dem Tyrosinkinaseinhibitor Axitinib sind neue Standards in der Erstlinientherapie und haben die Monotherapie mit Tyrosinkinase-Inhibitoren weitgehend verdrängt.

Für die Erstlinientherapie des mRCC sind Ipilimumab + Nivolumab (intermediäres und hoges Risiko) und Pembrolizumab + Axitinib sowie Avelumab + Axitinib für alle Risikogruppen zugelassen. Darüber hinaus stehen Sunitinib, Pazopanib, Tivozanib, Cabozantinib (intermediäres und hohes Risiko), die Kombination Bevacizumab + Interferon-alpha sowie Temsirolimus (hohes Risiko) zur Verfügung.

Sunitinib und Pazopanib haben eine Zulassung auch für die Zweitlinientherapie – bei Pazopanib gilt diese für den Einsatz nach Zytokinen. Für Nivolumab und Cabozantinib wurde in der Zweitlinientherapie ein signifikanter Überlebensvorteil gegenüber Everolimus gezeigt. Die Kombination Lenvatinib + Everolimus sowie Axitinib sind weitere für die Zweitlinie zugelassene Substanzen. Everolimus als Monotherapie ist durch die neuen Optionen in der Zweitlinie abgelöst worden.

Die Frage nach der optimalen Sequenztherapie muss aufgrund des Einzugs von CPI in die Erstlinie neu diskutiert werden, da die meisten Optionen nach Versagen einer VEGF-gerichteten TKI-Therapie geprüft wurden. Solange hierzu keine validen Studien oder Biomarker vorliegen, müssen andere Kriterien für die Therapieentscheidung herangezogen werden.

Ziel eines interdisziplinären RCC-Expertengesprächs war es, gemeinsame Therapieempfehlungen auf Basis der aktuell publizierten Daten und der eigenen klinischen Erfahrung für den Praxisalltag abzuleiten. Die Ergebnisse werden in dieser Publikation vorgestellt.

Abstract

Due to novel therapies, the prognosis of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) has improved. A median overall survival of more than two years is a realistic goal. Immunotherapy combinations with checkpoint inhibitors or checkpoint inhibitors and the tyrosine kinase inhibitor axitinib are new first-line options.

Sunitinib, pazopanib, tivozanib and the combination of bevacizumab + interferon alpha are approved for first-line therapy regardless of the progression risk score. The use of both the combination of nivolumab + ipilimumab and cabozantinib is restricted to intermediate and high-risk patients. In this subgroup, the immunotherapy combination was more effective in terms of overall survival compared with sunitinib. Temsirolimus is only approved for high-risk patients.

Sunitinib and pazopanib can also be applied as second-line options – for pazopanib the use is restricted to the event of cytokine failure. Nivolumab and cabozantinib demonstrated superior overall survival compared with everolimus. Furthermore, the combination of lenvatinib + everolimus and axitinib are approved treatment options in the second-line and further settings. Everolimus has been replaced in the second-line setting by these new options.

The question regarding the optimal sequence is still unanswered.

The purpose of an interdisciplinary expert meeting was to debate which criteria should influence treatment. The members discussed several aspects of treating patients with advanced or metastatic RCC. As in previous years, the experts intended to provide recommendations for clinical practice. The results are presented in this publication.

Schlüsselwörter

Nierenzellkarzinom - Nephrektomie - Metastasen - Medikamentöse Therapie - Immuntherapie

Keywords

renal cell cancer - metastases - medical treatment - immunotherapy - nephrectomy

* Dieser Beitrag wurde erstellt in Zusammenarbeit mit Anne Krampe-Scheidler, Berlin (Medical Writing).




Publication History

Article published online:
07 October 2020

© 2020. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Krebs in Deutschland 2015/2016. Berlin: Zentrum für Krebsregisterdaten und der Gesellschaft der epidemiologischen Krebsregister in Deutschland. e.V; 2019
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 2 Fachinformation Opdivo®; Stand: Mai 2020.
    PubMed
  • 3 Fachinformation CabometyxTM; Stand September 2019.
    PubMed
  • 4 Fachinformation Keytruda®; Stand: Juni 2020.
    PubMed
  • 5 Fachinformation Bavencio Stand: September 2019.
    PubMed
  • 6 Plimack ER, Rini BI, Stus V. et al. Pembrolizumab plus axitinib versus sunitinib as first-line therapy for advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC): Updated analysis of KEYNOTE-426. Journal of Clinical Oncology 2020; 38: 5001-5001
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Ljungberg B, Albiges L, Abu-Ghanem Y. et al. European Association of Urology Guidelines on Renal Cell Carcinoma: The 2019 Update. Eur Urol 2019; 75: 799-810
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Escudier B, Porta C, Schmidinger M. et al. Renal cell carcinoma: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up†. Ann Oncol 2019; 30: 706-720
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 NCCN Guidelines®, Version 2.2020 — August 5, 2019. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/kidney.pdf (Abruf: 11.01.2020)
    PubMed
  • 10 Rini BI, Battle D, Figlin RA. et al. The society for immunotherapy of cancer consensus statement on immunotherapy for the treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). J Immunother Cancer 2019; 7: 354
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Bergmann L, Bauernhofer T, Bokemeyer C. et al. Onkopedia-Leitlinie Nierenzellkarzinom (Hypernephrom). Stand: Mai 2020
    PubMed
  • 12 Heng DY, Xie W, Regan MM. et al. Prognostic factors for overall survival in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with vascular endothelial growth factor-targeted agents: results from a large, multicenter study. J Clin Oncol 2009; 27: 5794-5799
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Moch H, Cubilla AL, Humphrey PA. et al. The 2016 WHO Classification of Tumours of the Urinary System and Male Genital Organs-Part A: Renal, Penile, and Testicular Tumours. Eur Urol 2016; 70: 93-105
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 Bex A, Ljungberg B. Comparing Everolimus to Sunitinib in Non-clear-cell Renal Cell Carcinoma. Eur Urol 2016; 69: 875-876
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Ciccarese C, Iacovelli R, Brunelli M. et al. Addressing the best treatment for non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma: A meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials comparing VEGFR-TKis versus mTORi-targeted therapies. Eur J Cancer 2017; 83: 237-246
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 Bergmann L, Grünwald V, Maute L. et al. A Randomized Phase IIa Trial with Temsirolimus versus Sunitinib in Advanced Non-Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma: An Intergroup Study of the CESAR Central European Society for Anticancer Drug Research-EWIV and the Interdisciplinary Working Group on Renal Cell Cancer (IAGN) of the German Cancer Society. Oncol Res Treat 2020;
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Vera-Badillo FE, Templeton AJ, Duran I. et al. Systemic therapy for non-clear cell renal cell carcinomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol 2015; 67: 740-749
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 McDermott DF, Choueiri TK, Motzer RJ. et al. CheckMate 214 post-hoc analyses of nivolumab plus ipilimumab or sunitinib in IMDC intermediate/poor-risk patients with previously untreated advanced renal cell carcinoma with sarcomatoid features. Journal of Clinical Oncology 2019; 37: 4513-4513
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 Rini BI, Plimack ER, Stus V. et al. Pembrolizumab (pembro) plus axitinib (axi) versus sunitinib as first-line therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC): Outcomes in the combined IMDC intermediate/poor risk and sarcomatoid subgroups of the phase 3 KEYNOTE-426 study. Journal of Clinical Oncology 2019; 37: 4500-4500
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 Rini BI, Motzer RJ, Powles T. et al. Atezolizumab (atezo) + bevacizumab (bev) versus sunitinib (sun) in pts with untreated metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) and sarcomatoid (sarc) histology: IMmotion151 subgroup analysis. Journal of Clinical Oncology 2019; 37: 4512-4512
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 Pichler R, Compérat E, Klatte T. et al. Renal Cell Carcinoma with Sarcomatoid Features: Finally New Therapeutic Hope?. Cancers (Basel) 2019;
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 22 Buonerba C, Dolce P, Iaccarino S. et al. Outcomes Associated with First-Line anti-PD-1/ PD-L1 agents vs. Sunitinib in Patients with Sarcomatoid Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cancers (Basel) 2020;
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 23 Ahrens M, Scheich S, Hartmann A. et al. Non-Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma - Pathology and Treatment Options. Oncol Res Treat 2019; 42: 128-135
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 24 Ahrens M, Escudier B, Boleti E. et al. A randomized phase II study of nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus standard of care in previously untreated and advanced non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma (SUNIFORECAST). Journal of Clinical Oncology 2020;
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 25 Leitlinienprogramm Onkologie (Deutsche Krebsgesellschaft, Deutsche Krebshilfe, AWMF): Diagnostik, Therapie und Nachsorge des Nierenzellkarzinoms, Langversion 1.2, 2017, AWMF Registernummer: 043/017OL. http://leitlinienprogramm-onkologie.de/Nierenzellkarzinom.85.0.htm (abgerufen am 10.01.2020)
    PubMed
  • 26 Escudier B, Szczylik C, Porta C. et al. Treatment selection in metastatic renal cell carcinoma: expert consensus. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2012; 9: 327-337
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 27 Bergmann L, Beck J, Bothe K. et al. Treatment algorithm for metastatic renal cell carcinoma--recommendations based on evidence and clinical practice. In Oncol Res Treat, Edition Netherlands 2014; 136-141
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 28 Rini BI, Plimack ER, Stus V. et al. Pembrolizumab plus Axitinib versus Sunitinib for Advanced Renal-Cell Carcinoma. N Engl J Med 2019; 380: 1116-1127
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 29 Motzer RJ, Penkov K, Haanen J. et al. Avelumab plus Axitinib versus Sunitinib for Advanced Renal-Cell Carcinoma. N Engl J Med 2019; 380: 1103-1115
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 30 Motzer RJ, Tannir NM, McDermott DF. et al. Nivolumab plus Ipilimumab versus Sunitinib in Advanced Renal-Cell Carcinoma. N Engl J Med 2018; 378: 1277-1290
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 31 Motzer RJ, Rini BI, McDermott DF. et al. Nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus sunitinib in first-line treatment for advanced renal cell carcinoma: extended follow-up of efficacy and safety results from a randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2019; 20: 1370-1385
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 32 Tannir NM, McDermott DF, Escudier B. et al. Overall survival and independent review of response in CheckMate 214 with 42-month follow-up: First-line nivolumab + ipilimumab (N+I) versus sunitinib (S) in patients (pts) with advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC). Journal of Clinical Oncology 2020; 38: 609-609
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 33 Rini BI, Powles T, Atkins MB. et al. Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab versus sunitinib in patients with previously untreated metastatic renal cell carcinoma (IMmotion151): a multicentre, open-label, phase 3, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2019; 393: 2404-2415
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 34 Choueiri TK, Hessel C, Halabi S. et al. Cabozantinib versus sunitinib as initial therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma of intermediate or poor risk (Alliance A031203 CABOSUN randomised trial): Progression-free survival by independent review and overall survival update. Eur J Cancer 2018; 94: 115-125
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 35 Lee JL, Kim MK, Park I. et al. RandomizEd phase II trial of Sunitinib four weeks on and two weeks off versus Two weeks on and One week off in metastatic clear-cell type REnal cell carcinoma: RESTORE trial. Ann Oncol 2015; 26: 2300-2305
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 36 Sternberg CN, Davis ID, Mardiak J. et al. Pazopanib in locally advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma: results of a randomized phase III trial. J Clin Oncol 2010; 28: 1061-1068
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 37 Sternberg CN, Hawkins RE, Wagstaff J. et al. A randomised, double-blind phase III study of pazopanib in patients with advanced and/or metastatic renal cell carcinoma: final overall survival results and safety update. Eur J Cancer 2013; 49: 1287-1296
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 38 Motzer RJ, Hutson TE, Cella D. et al. Pazopanib versus sunitinib in metastatic renal-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med 2013; 369: 722-731
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 39 Motzer RJ, Hutson TE, McCann L. et al. Overall survival in renal-cell carcinoma with pazopanib versus sunitinib. N Engl J Med 2014; 370: 1769-1770
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 40 Fachinformation Fotivida; Stand: Oktober 2019.
    PubMed
  • 41 Motzer RJ, Nosov D, Eisen T. et al. Tivozanib versus sorafenib as initial targeted therapy for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: results from a phase III trial. J Clin Oncol 2013; 31: 3791-3799
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 42 Escudier B, Bellmunt J, Négrier S. et al. Phase III trial of bevacizumab plus interferon alfa-2a in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (AVOREN): final analysis of overall survival. J Clin Oncol 2010; 28: 2144-2150
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 43 Fachinformation Torisel®; Stand: Januar 2019.
    PubMed
  • 44 Hudes G, Carducci M, Tomczak P. et al. Temsirolimus, interferon alfa, or both for advanced renal-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med 2007; 356: 2271-2281
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 45 Barata PC, De Liano AG, Mendiratta P. et al. The efficacy of VEGFR TKI therapy after progression on immune combination therapy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Br J Cancer 2018; 119: 160-163
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 46 Kröger N, Merseburger AS, Bedke J. Current recommendations for the systemic treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Aktuelle Urol 2019; 50: 606-611
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 47 Ornstein MC, Pal SK, Wood LS. et al. Individualised axitinib regimen for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma after treatment with checkpoint inhibitors: a multicentre, single-arm, phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol 2019; 20: 1386-1394
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 48 Fachinformation Sutent®; Stand: Oktober 2019.
    PubMed
  • 49 Fachinformation Inlyta®; Stand: November 2019.
    PubMed
  • 50 Fachinformation Kisplyx®; Stand: Oktober 2019.
    PubMed
  • 51 Motzer RJ, Escudier B, McDermott DF. et al. Nivolumab versus Everolimus in Advanced Renal-Cell Carcinoma. N Engl J Med 2015; 373: 1803-1813
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 52 Choueiri TK, Escudier B, Powles T. et al. Cabozantinib versus Everolimus in Advanced Renal-Cell Carcinoma. N Engl J Med 2015; 373: 1814-1823
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 53 Motzer RJ, Hutson TE, Glen H. et al. Lenvatinib, everolimus, and the combination in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a randomised, phase 2, open-label, multicentre trial. Lancet Oncol 2015; 16: 1473-1482
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 54 Rini BI, Pal SK, Escudier BJ. et al. Tivozanib versus sorafenib in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (TIVO-3): a phase 3, multicentre, randomised, controlled, open-label study. Lancet Oncol 2020; 21: 95-104
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 55 Johannsen M, Flörcken A, Bex A. et al. Can tyrosine kinase inhibitors be discontinued in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma and a complete response to treatment? A multicentre, retrospective analysis. Eur Urol 2009; 55: 1430-1438
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 56 McDermott DF, Drake CG, Sznol M. et al. Survival, Durable Response, and Long-Term Safety in Patients With Previously Treated Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma Receiving Nivolumab. J Clin Oncol 2015; 33: 2013-2020
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 57 McDermott DF, Rini BI, Tannir NM. et al. Treatment-Free Interval (TFI) Following Discontinuation of First-Line Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab (N+I) or Sunitinib (S) in Patients (Pts) With Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma (aRCC): CheckMate 214 Analysis. Annals of Oncology 2018;
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 58 Escudier B, Motzer RJ, Sharma P. et al. Treatment Beyond Progression in Patients with Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma Treated with Nivolumab in CheckMate 025. Eur Urol 2017; 72: 368-376
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 59 George S, Motzer RJ, Hammers HJ. et al. Safety and Efficacy of Nivolumab in Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Treated Beyond Progression: A Subgroup Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Oncol 2016; 2: 1179-1186
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 60 Foller S, Oppel-Heuchel H, Fetter I. et al. Adverse events of immune checkpoint inhibitors. Urologe A 2017; 56: 486-491
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 61 Méjean A, Ravaud A, Thezenas S. et al. Sunitinib Alone or after Nephrectomy in Metastatic Renal-Cell Carcinoma. N Engl J Med 2018; 379: 417-427
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 62 Sassa N, Kato M, Funahashi Y. et al. Efficacy of pre-surgical axitinib for shrinkage of inferior vena cava thrombus in a patient with advanced renal cell carcinoma. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2014; 44: 370-373
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 63 Karam JA, Devine CE, Urbauer DL. et al. Phase 2 trial of neoadjuvant axitinib in patients with locally advanced nonmetastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Eur Urol 2014; 66: 874-880
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 64 Kats-Ugurlu G, Oosterwijk E, Muselaers S. et al. Neoadjuvant sorafenib treatment of clear cell renal cell carcinoma and release of circulating tumor fragments. Neoplasia 2014; 16: 221-228
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 65 Bex A, Jonasch E, Kirkali Z. et al. Integrating surgery with targeted therapies for renal cell carcinoma: current evidence and ongoing trials. Eur Urol 2010; 58: 819-828
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 66 Jonasch E, Wood CG, Matin SF. et al. Phase II presurgical feasibility study of bevacizumab in untreated patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 2009; 27: 4076-4081
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 67 Thomas AA, Rini BI, Stephenson AJ. et al. Surgical resection of renal cell carcinoma after targeted therapy. J Urol 2009; 182: 881-886
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 68 Cowey CL, Amin C, Pruthi RS. et al. Neoadjuvant clinical trial with sorafenib for patients with stage II or higher renal cell carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 2010; 28: 1502-1507
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 69 Ravaud A, Motzer RJ, Pandha HS. et al. Adjuvant Sunitinib in High-Risk Renal-Cell Carcinoma after Nephrectomy. N Engl J Med 2016; 375: 2246-2254
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 70 Ristau BT, Manola J, Haas NB. et al. Retroperitoneal Lymphadenectomy for High Risk, Nonmetastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: An Analysis of the ASSURE (ECOG-ACRIN 2805) Adjuvant Trial. J Urol 2018; 199: 53-59
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 71 Motzer RJ, Haas NB, Donskov F. et al. Randomized Phase III Trial of Adjuvant Pazopanib Versus Placebo After Nephrectomy in Patients With Localized or Locally Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 2017; 35: 3916-3923
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 72 Gross-Goupil M, Kwon TG, Eto M. et al. Axitinib versus placebo as an adjuvant treatment of renal cell carcinoma: results from the phase III, randomized ATLAS trial. Ann Oncol 2018; 29: 2371-2378
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar