Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/a-1234-8233
Lower gastrointestinal polypectomy competencies in the United Kingdom: a retrospective analysis of Directly Observed Polypectomy Skills (DOPyS)
Abstract
Background Polypectomy is often the most hazardous part of colonoscopy. There is significant variability in polypectomy training and assessment internationally. DOPyS (Directly Observed Polypectomy Skills) is a validated assessment tool and is used to demonstrate polypectomy competency in the UK. This study aimed to describe the learning curve for polypectomy competency in UK trainees.
Methods Retrospective DOPyS data (January 2009 to September 2015) were obtained from the UK Joint Advisory Group (JAG) for intestinal endoscopy training system (JETS) national database. The number of lower gastrointestinal (LGI) procedures, overall cecal intubation rate (CIR), procedure intensity, and time in days to the first DOPyS assessment were recorded, and time to JAG certification was calculated.
Results 4965 DOPyS assessments from 336 trainees were analyzed. Within the study period, 124 and 53 trainees achieved provisional and full colonoscopy certification, respectively. Trainees started formative assessment of polypectomy after > 130 LGI procedures and with a CIR of > 70 %. Within 3 years from the first DOPyS assessment, 94 % of trainees achieved provisional certification, and 50 % full certification. Higher procedure intensity at baseline DOPyS assessment was associated with a higher likelihood of obtaining certification sooner.
Conclusion There is a significant variation in time to competency, and this potentially reflects the time necessary to acquire polypectomy skills. There is a need to start polypectomy training earlier, once sufficient skills, such as tip control, have been achieved to shorten the time to competency. Overall, the CIR could be used as a guide for such technical skills. Increasing exposure to training lists also potentially reduces the time to polypectomy competency.
Publication History
Received: 02 May 2020
Accepted: 06 August 2020
Accepted Manuscript online:
06 August 2020
Article published online:
23 October 2020
© 2020. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
-
References
- 1 JRCTPB. Specialty Training Curriculum For Gastroenterology. 2010 Available at (Accessed 27 August 2020): https://www.jrcptb.org.uk/sites/default/files/2010%20Gastroenterology%20%28amendment%202013%29_0.pdf
- 2 ISCP. The Intercollegiate Surgical Curriculum: Educating the surgeons of the future. 2013 Available at (Accessed 27 August 2020): https://www.iscp.ac.uk/static/public/syllabus/syllabus_gs_2016.pdf
- 3 UK General Medical Council. Shape of Training. Securing the future of excellent patient care. 2013 Available at (Accessed 27 August 2020): https://www.gmc-uk.org/-/media/documents/shape-of-training-final-report_pdf-53977887.pdf
- 4 JRCTPB. The state of physicianly training in the UK. Report 1. 2017 Available at (Accessed 27 August 2020): https://www.jrcptb.org.uk/sites/default/files/JRCPTB_SoPT_report_FINAL_WEB.pdf
-
5
Health Education England.
Accelerated training programme for non-medical endoscopists. Available at (Accessed 27 August 2020): https://www.hee.nhs.uk/our-work/endoscopy/clinical-endoscopist-training-programme
- 6 Gupta S, Anderson J, Bhandari P. et al. Development and validation of a novel method for assessing competency in polypectomy: direct observation of polypectomy skills. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 73: 1232-1239 e1232
- 7 Gupta S, Bassett P, Man R. et al. Validation of a novel method for assessing competency in polypectomy. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 75: 568-575
-
8
JAG Advisory Group on GI Endoscopy.
Formative DOPyS: Colonoscopy and Flexible Sigmoidoscopy. Available at (Accessed 27 August 2020): https://www.thejag.org.uk/AboutUs/DownloadCentre.aspx
-
9
JAG Advisory Group on GI Endoscopy.
New DOPS and DOPyS forms and certification criteria. Available at (Accessed 27 August 2020): https://www.thejag.org.uk/AboutUs/DownloadCentre.aspx
-
10
JAG Advisory Group on GI Endoscopy.
JETS e-portfolio. Available at (Accessed 27 August 2020): http://www.jets.nhs.uk/ePortfolio.aspx
-
11
JAG Advisory Group on GI Endoscopy.
JAG trainee certification process colonoscopy (provisional and full) certification. Available at (Accessed 27 August 2020): https://www.thejag.org.uk/Downloads/JAG/JAG%20certification/JAG%20certification%20criteria%20and%20application%20process.pdf
-
12
Conjoint Committee for the Recognition of Training in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.
Information for applicants: Procedure requirements. Available at (Accessed 27 August 2020): https://www.conjoint.org.au/applicants.html#procedural
- 13 Romagnuolo J, Enns R, Ponich T. et al. Canadian credentialing guidelines for colonoscopy. Can J Gastroenterol 2008; 22: 17-22
- 14 Ferlitsch M, Moss A, Hassan C. et al. Colorectal polypectomy and endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR): European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Clinical Guideline. Endoscopy 2017; 49: 270-297
- 15 ASGE. Colonoscopy core curriculum. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 76: 482-490
- 16 Patel SG, Duloy A, Kaltenbach T. et al. Development and validation of a video-based cold snare polypectomy assessment tool (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc 2019; 89: 1222-1230.e1222
- 17 Kaltenbach T, Anderson JC, Burke CA. et al. Endoscopic removal of colorectal lesions: recommendations by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Am J Gastroenterol 2020; 115: 435-446
- 18 Boo S-J, Jung JH, Park JH. et al. An adequate level of training for technically competent colonoscopic polypectomy. Scand J Gastroenterol 2015; 50: 908-915
- 19 Choung BS, Kim SH, Ahn DS. et al. Incidence and risk factors of delayed postpolypectomy bleeding: a retrospective cohort study. J Clin Gastroenterol 2014; 48: 784-789
- 20 Patwardhan VR, Feuerstein JD, Sengupta N. et al. Fellowship colonoscopy training and preparedness for independent gastroenterology practice. J Clin Gastroenterol 2016; 50: 45-51
- 21 Ward ST, Mohammed MA, Walt R. et al. An analysis of the learning curve to achieve competency at colonoscopy using the JETS database. Gut 2014; 63: 1746-1754
- 22 Benson M, Lucey M, Pfau P. Caecal intubation rates and colonoscopy competency. Gut 2015; 64: 359
- 23 Spier BJ, Benson M, Pfau PR. et al. Colonoscopy training in gastroenterology fellowships: determining competence. Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 71: 319-324
- 24 Sedlack RE. Training to competency in colonoscopy: assessing and defining competency standards. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 74: 355-366 e351-e352
- 25 Zupanc CM, Burgess-Limerick R, Hill A. et al. A competency framework for colonoscopy training derived from cognitive task analysis techniques and expert review. BMC Med Educ 2015; 15: 216
- 26 Chadwick G, Budihal S. PTU-050 Is current UK colonoscopy training fit for purpose? – results of the 2014 BSG training survey. Gut 2015; 64 (Suppl. 01) A81
- 27 Rees CJ, Thomas Gibson S, Rutter MD. et al. UK key performance indicators and quality assurance standards for colonoscopy. Gut 2016; 65: 1923-1929
- 28 Haycock AV, Youd P, Bassett P. et al. Simulator training improves practical skills in therapeutic GI endoscopy: results from a randomized, blinded, controlled study. Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 70: 835-845