PDF herunterladen
ZWR - Das Deutsche Zahnärzteblatt 2020; 129(09): 438-442
DOI: 10.1055/a-1227-2725
Fortbildung
Allgemeine Zahnheilkunde

Erfolg und Misserfolg bei der zahnärztlichen Sedierung

Frank G. Mathers
,
Wolfgang Jakobs
› Weitere Informationen
Auch verfügbar auf
    Lizenzen und Reprints

Zahnärzte wenden zunehmend dentale Sedierungstechniken an, um die Zahnbehandlung für Patient und Behandler zu optimieren. Damit eine Sedierung möglichst erfolgreich abläuft, gibt es bestimmte Voraussetzungen.

Publikationsverlauf

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
28. September 2020

© 2020. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Stuttgart · New York

 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Brand HS, Gortzak RA, Palmer-Bouva CC. et al. Cardiovascular and neuroendocrine responses during acute stress induced by different types of dental treatment. Int Dent J 1995; 45: 45-48
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Dušková M, Vašáková J, Dušková J. et al. The role of stress hormones in dental management behavior problems. Physiol Res 2017; 66 (Suppl. 03) S317-S322
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Salpekar JA, Basu T, Thangaraj S. et al. The intersections of stress, anxiety and epilepsy. Int Rev Neurobiol 2020; 152: 195-219
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Mathers FG, Schön H, Jakobs W. et al. Erfolg und Misserfolg bei der Sedierung: Zahnmediziner und Anästhesisten. Poster-Veröffentlichung. Frankfurt, Germany: Deutscher Zahnärztetag; 2019
    Google Scholar
  • 5 Kapur A, Jain K, Goyal A. et al. Oral Midazolam Sedation For Uncooperative Children In Outpatient Paedodontics: Time For Reappraisal. SAAD Dig 2016; 32: 14-16
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Wilson KE, Thorpe RJ, McCabe JF. et al. Complications associated with intravenous midazolam sedation in anxious dental patients. Prim Dent Care 2011; 18: 161-166
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Isik B, Baygin O, Bodur H. Premedication with melatonin vs. midazolam in anxious children. Paediatr Anaesth 2008; 18: 635-641
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Sahu S, Patley A, Kharsan V. et al. Comparative evaluation of efficacy and latency of twin mix vs 2% lignocaine HCL with 1:80000 epinephrine in surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molar. J Family Med Prim Care 2020; 9: 904-908
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Jain NK, John RR. Anesthetic efficacy of 4% articaine versus 2% lignocaine during the surgical removal of the third molar: A comparative prospective study. Anesth Essays Res 2016; 10: 356-361
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Becker DE. Pharmacokinetic considerations for moderate and deep sedation. Anesth Prog 2011; 58: 166-172 quiz 173
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Moore DL, Ding L, Yang G. et al. Impact of Instituting General Anesthesia on Oral Sedation Care in a Tertiary Care Pediatric Dental Clinic. Anesth Prog 2019; 66: 183-191
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Sivaramakrishnan G, Sridharan K. Nitrous Oxide and Midazolam Sedation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Anesth Prog 2017; 64: 59-65
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Papineni A, Lourenco-Matharu L, Ashley PF. Safety of oral midazolam sedation use in paediatric dentistry: a review. Int J Paediatr Dent 2014; 24: 2-13
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 McKenzie WS, Rosenberg M. Paradoxical reaction following administration of a benzodiazepine. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2010; 68: 3034-3036
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Gillet C, Polard E, Mauduit N. et al. [Acting out and psychoactive substances: alcohol, drugs, illicit substances]. Encephale 2001; 27: 351-359
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Benzoni T, Cascella M. Procedural Sedation. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls; 2020. Im Internet (Stand: 19.08.2020): https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK551685/
    Google Scholar
  • 17 Reuter NG, Westgate PM, Ingram M. et al. Death related to dental treatment: a systematic review. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2017; 123: 194-204.e10
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Galili D, Garfunkel A, Elad S. et al. [Respiratory distress]. Refuat Hapeh Vehashinayim (1993) 2002; 19: 34-46 100
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Harbuz DK, OʼHalloran M. Techniques to administer oral, inhalational, and IV sedation in dentistry. Australas Med J 2016; 9: 25-32
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Jastak JT, Peskin RM. Major morbidity or mortality from office anesthetic procedures: a closed-claim analysis of 13 cases. Anesth Prog 1991; 38: 39-44
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Jackson DL, Johnson BS. Conscious sedation for dentistry: risk management and patient selection. Dent Clin North Am 2002; 46: 767-780
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Owens WD, Felts JA, Spitznagel EL. ASA physical status classifications: a study of consistency of ratings. Anesthesiology 1978; 49: 239-243
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Rafique S, Banerjee A, Fiske J. Management of the petrified dental patient. Dent Update 2008; 35: 196-198 201–202, 204 passim
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Feck AS, Goodchild JH. The use of anxiolytic medications to supplement local anesthesia in the anxious patient. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2005; 26: 183-186 188–190, quiz 191–209
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Nakai Y, Milgrom P, Mancl L. et al. Effectiveness of local anesthesia in pediatric dental practice. J Am Dent Assoc 2000; 131: 1699-1705
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Parker W, Estrich CG, Abt E. et al. Benefits and harms of capnography during procedures involving moderate sedation: A rapid review and meta-analysis. J Am Dent Assoc 2018; 149: 38-50.e2
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar