CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Endosc Int Open 2020; 08(10): E1332-E1340
DOI: 10.1055/a-1214-5822
Original article

Efficacy of transoral outlet reduction in Roux-en-Y gastric bypass patients to promote weight loss: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Banreet Singh Dhindsa
1   Department of Internal Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Las Vegas, Nevada, United States
,
Syed Mohsin Saghir
1   Department of Internal Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Las Vegas, Nevada, United States
,
Yassin Naga
1   Department of Internal Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Las Vegas, Nevada, United States
,
Amaninder Dhaliwal
2   Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Las Vegas, Nevada, United States
,
Dayl Ramai
3   Department of Internal Medicine, The Brooklyn Hospital Center, Brooklyn, New York, United States
,
Chad Cross
4   Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Nevada Las Vegas, Las Vegas, Nevada, United States
,
Shailender Singh
2   Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Las Vegas, Nevada, United States
,
Ishfaq Bhat
2   Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Las Vegas, Nevada, United States
,
Douglas G. Adler
5   Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Huntsman Cancer Center, Salt Lake City, Utah
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Background and study aims Transoral outlet reduction (TORe) is an endoscopic procedure used in patients with weight gain post Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of TORe with a full-thickness suturing device for treating patients with weight regain after RYGB.

Patients and methods We conducted a comprehensive search of several databases and conference proceedings including PubMed, EMBASE, Google-Scholar, MEDLINE, SCOPUS, and Web of Science databases (earliest inception to March 2020). The primary outcomes assessed were technical success, absolute weight loss (AWL) and percent of total weight loss (% TWL) at 3, 6, and 12 months after the procedure. The secondary outcomes assessed were pooled rate of adverse events (AEs), adverse event subtypes and association of size of gastrojejunal anastomosis (GJA) and percent TWL.

Results Thirteen studies on 850 patients were included. The pooled rate of technical success was 99.89 %. The absolute weight loss (kg) at 3, 6, and 12 months was 6.14, 10.15, and 7.14, respectively. The percent TWL at 3, 6, and 12 months was 6.69, 11.34, and 8.55, respectively. The pooled rate of AE was 11.4 % with abdominal pain being the most common adverse event. The correlation coefficient (r) was –0.11 between post TORe GJA size and weight loss at 12 months.

Conclusion TORe is an endoscopic procedure that is safe and technically feasible for post RYGB with weight gain.

Supplementary material



Publication History

Received: 08 April 2020

Accepted: 22 May 2020

Article published online:
22 September 2020

© 2020. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commecial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 
  • References

  • 1 Afshin A, Forouzanfar MH. GBD 2015 Obesity Collaborators. et al. Health effects of overweight and obesity in 195 countries over 25 years. N Engl J Med 2017; 377: 13-27
  • 2 Smith KB, Smith MS. Obesity statistics. Primary care 2016; 43: 121-135, ix
  • 3 Tran DD, Nwokeabia ID, Purnell S. et al. Revision of Roux-En-Y gastric bypass for weight regain: a systematic review of techniques and outcomes. Obes Surg 2016; 26: 1627-1634
  • 4 Gloy VL, Briel M, Bhatt DL. et al. Bariatric surgery versus non-surgical treatment for obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ 2013; 347: f5934
  • 5 Maciejewski ML, Arterburn DE, Van Scoyoc L. et al. Bariatric Surgery and long-term durability of weight loss. JAMA Surg 2016; 151: 1046-1055
  • 6 King WC, Hinerman AS, Belle SH. et al. Comparison of the performance of common measures of weight regain after bariatric surgery for association with clinical outcomes. JAMA 2018; 320: 1560-1569
  • 7 Changela K, Ofori E, Duddempudi S. et al. Peroral endoscopic reduction of dilated gastrojejunal anastomosis after bariatric surgery: Techniques and efficacy. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2016; 8: 239-243
  • 8 Karmali S, Brar B, Shi X. et al. Weight recidivism post-bariatric surgery: a systematic review. Obes Surg 2013; 23: 1922-1933
  • 9 Hourneaux De Moura DT, Thompson CC. Endoscopic management of weight regain following Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Expert Rev Endocrinol Metab 2019; 14: 97-110
  • 10 American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery. Estimate of Bariatric surgery numbers, 2011–2018. https://asmbs.org/resources/estimate-of-bariatric-surgery-numbers
  • 11 Jirapinyo P, Dayyeh BK, Thompson CC. Gastrojejunal anastomotic reduction for weight regain in roux-en-y gastric bypass patients: physiological, behavioral, and anatomical effects of endoscopic suturing and sclerotherapy. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2016; 12: 1810-1816
  • 12 Vargas EJ, Bazerbachi F, Rizk M. et al. Transoral outlet reduction with full thickness endoscopic suturing for weight regain after gastric bypass: a large multicenter international experience and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 2018; 32: 252-259
  • 13 Abu Dayyeh BK, Lautz DB, Thompson CC. Gastrojejunal stoma diameter predicts weight regain after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Clin Gastroenterol Hepat 2011; 9: 228-233
  • 14 Thompson CC, Slattery J, Bundga ME. et al. Peroral endoscopic reduction of dilated gastrojejunal anastomosis after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a possible new option for patients with weight regain. Surg Endosc 2006; 20: 1744-1748
  • 15 Wong SKH. Endoscopic full-thickness transoral outlet reduction with endoscopic submucosal dissection or argon plasma coagulation: does it make a difference?. Endoscopy 2019; 51: 617-618
  • 16 Watson RR. The use of the Overstitch for bariatric weight loss. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2020; 30: 115-128
  • 17 Kumar N, Thompson CC. Comparison of a superficial suturing device with a full-thickness suturing device for transoral outlet reduction (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc 2014; 79: 984-989
  • 18 Eid GM, McCloskey CA, Eagleton JK. et al. StomaphyX vs a sham procedure for revisional surgery to reduce regained weight in Roux-en-Y gastric bypass patients : a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Surg 2014; 149: 372-379
  • 19 Brunaldi VO, Jirapinyo P, de Moura DTH. et al. Endoscopic Treatment of weight regain following roux-en-y gastric bypass: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Surg 2018; 28: 266-276
  • 20 Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J. et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Annals Internal Med 2009; 151: 264-269
  • 21 Stang A. Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses. Eur J Epidemiol 2010; 25: 603-605
  • 22 Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D. et al. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary?. Control Clin Trials 1996; 17: 1-12
  • 23 Callahan ZM, Su B, Kuchta K. et al. Five-year results of endoscopic gastrojejunostomy revision (transoral outlet reduction) for weight gain after gastric bypass. Surg Endosc 2019; DOI: 10.1007/s00464-019-07003-6.
  • 24 Goyal D, Kim S, Dutson E. et al. Endoscopic trans-oral outlet reduction in combination with gastroplasty (TORe-G) is a novel technique that is highly efficacious and safe for weight loss in patients with failed Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). American Journal of Gastroenterology 2015; 110: S656-S657
  • 25 Staudenmann D, Gass M, Milone C. et al. Transoral outlet reduction (TORe) partially reverses weight regain after bariatric Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). First clinical experience from a tertiary referral center. Muttenz, Switzerland: Emh Swiss Medical Publishers Ltd Farnsburgerstr 8; Ch-4132 2S
  • 26 Espinet-Coll E, Nebreda-Durán J, López-Nava-Breviere G. et al. Eficacia y seguridad del TORe mediante sutura endoscópica para tratar la reganancia ponderal tras bypass gástrico quirúrgico en Y-de-Roux. Revista Española de Enfermedades Digestivas 2018; 110: 551-556
  • 27 Fayad L, Schweitzer M, Raad M. et al. A real-world, insurance-based algorithm using the two-fold running suture technique for transoral outlet reduction for weight regain and dumping syndrome after Roux-En-Y gastric bypass. Obes Surg 2019; 29: 2225-2232
  • 28 Hollenbach M, Selig L, Lellwitz S. et al. Endoscopic full-thickness transoral outlet reduction with semicircumferential endoscopic submucosal dissection. Endoscopy 2019; 51: 684-688
  • 29 Brunaldi VO, Ayala Farias GF, Tavares de Rezende D. et al. Argon plasma coagulation alone versus endoscopic suturing plus argon plasma coagulation to treat weight regain after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a prospective randomized trial (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc 2020; DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.03.3757.
  • 30 Cotton PB, Eisen GM, Aabakken L. et al. A lexicon for endoscopic adverse events: report of an ASGE workshop. Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 71: 446-454
  • 31 DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 1986; 7: 177-188
  • 32 Higgins JPT, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ. et al. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 2003; 327: 557-560
  • 33 Kanwal F, White D. “Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses” in clinical gastroenterology and hepatology. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2012; 10: 1184-1186
  • 34 Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R. et al. GRADE guidelines: 7. Rating the quality of evidence – inconsistency. J Clin Epidemiol 2011; 64: 1294-1302
  • 35 Furuya-Kanamori L, Barendregt JJ, Doi SAR. A new improved graphical and quantitative method for detecting bias in meta-analysis. Int J Evid Based Healthc 2018; 16: 195-203
  • 36 Tsai C, Steffen R, Kessler U. et al. Endoscopic gastrojejunal revisions following gastric bypass: lessons learned in more than 100 consecutive patients. J Gastrointest Surg 2019; 23: 58-66
  • 37 Jirapinyo P, Kumar N, AlSamman MA. et al. Five-year outcomes of transoral outlet reduction for the treatment of weight regain after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Gastrointest Endosc 2019; DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2019.11.044.
  • 38 Chang SH, Stoll CR, Song J. et al. The effectiveness and risks of bariatric surgery: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis, 2003–2012. JAMA Surg 2014; 149: 275-287
  • 39 Ghiassi S, Higa K, Chang S. et al. Conversion of standard Roux-en-Y gastric bypass to distal bypass for weight loss failure and metabolic syndrome: 3-year follow-up and evolution of technique to reduce nutritional complications. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2018; 14: 554-561
  • 40 Shimizu H, Annaberdyev S, Motamarry I. et al. Revisional bariatric surgery for unsuccessful weight loss and complications. Obes Surg 2013; 23: 1766-1773
  • 41 Jirapinyo P, de Moura DTH, Thompson CC. Endoscopic submucosal dissection with suturing for the treatment of weight regain after gastric bypass: outcomes and comparison with traditional transoral outlet reduction (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2020; DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.01.036.
  • 42 Kothari T, Kaul V, Bittner K. et al. Outcomes of a Transoral Outlet Reduction Endoscopy Procedure for Weight Regain Due to Dilated Anastomosis Aperture in Roux-en-Y Patients: 1024. American Journal of Gastroenterology 2018; 113: 582-583
  • 43 Catalano MF, Khan NM, Lajin M. et al. Mo2005 Gastric Outlet Revision Using Endoscopic Suturing (ES) in Patients Presenting With Weight Regain Following Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB). Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2016; 83: AB491
  • 44 Laterza L, Boskoski I, Landi R. et al. Transoral Outlet Reduction for Therapy of Weight Regain After Gastric Bypass: 770. American Journal of Gastroenterology 2017; 112: S430-S431