Impact of Transferring a Poor Quality Embryo Along with a Good Quality Embryo on Pregnancy Outcomes in IVF/ICSI Cycles: a Retrospective Study

Abstract

Background The number and the quality of embryos transferred are important predictors of success in in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles. In the presence of more than one good quality embryo on the transfer day, double-embryo transfer (DET) can be performed with these embryos, but generally, different quality embryos are present in the available transfer cohort. We aimed to investigate the effect of transferring a poor quality embryo along with a good quality embryo on IVF outcomes.

Methods In this study, 2298 fresh IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles with two good quality embryos (group A), one good and one poor quality embryo (group B), and single good quality embryo (group C) transfers were examined. All groups were divided into two subgroups according to the transfer day as cleavage or blastocyst stage. Clinical pregnancy and live birth rates were the primary outcomes.

Results In the cleavage stage transfer subgroups, the clinical pregnancy rates were lower in the single-embryo transfer (SET) subgroup compared with DET subgroups, but the difference was not statistically significant compared with DET with mixed quality embryos. The live birth rates were comparable between the three groups. In the blastocyst transfer subgroups, the clinical pregnancy and live birth rates were significantly higher in DET with two good quality embryos than DET with mixed quality embryos and SET groups. Multiple pregnancy rates were higher in both DET groups in terms of transfer day (p = 0.001).

Conclusion DET with mixed quality embryos results with lower clinical pregnancy and live birth rates compared with DET with two good quality embryos at the blastocyst stage. At cleavage stage transfer, there is no difference in live birth rates between the two groups.

Zusammenfassung

Hintergrund Anzahl und Qualität von transferierten Embryos sind wichtige Prädiktoren für den Erfolg bei In-vitro-Fertilisations-(IVF-)Zyklen. Wenn mehr als ein Embryo von guter Qualität am Transfertag vorhanden ist, kann ein Doppelembryonentransfer (DET) mit diesen Embyros vorgenommen werden. Generell sind aber die verfügbaren Embryos von sehr unterschiedlicher Qualität. Ziel dieser Studie war es, die Auswirkung eines Transfers von einem Embryo schlechter Qualität zusammen mit einem Embryo guter Qualität auf das IVF-Outcome zu untersuchen.

Methoden In dieser Studie wurden 2298 frische IVF/intrazytoplasmatische Spermieninjektions-(ICSI-)Zyklen, bei denen entweder 2 Embryos von guter Qualität (Gruppe A), ein Embryo von guter Qualität und ein Embryo von schlechter Qualität (Gruppe B), oder ein einziges Embryo von guter Qualität (Gruppe C) transferiert wurden, verglichen. Alle diese Gruppen wurden je nach Transfertag (im Teilungsstadium bzw. Blastozystenstadium) nochmals in 2 Untergruppen unterteilt. Die primären Endpunkte waren klinische Schwangerschaftsrate und Lebendgeburtenrate.

Ergebnisse In den Teilungsstadiumtransfer-Untergruppen waren die klinischen Schwangerschaftsraten niedriger in der Untergruppe mit einem einzigen transferierten Embryo (SET) verglichen mit den DET-Untergruppen, aber der Unterschied zu den DET-Untergruppen mit Embyros gemischter Qualität war nicht statistisch signifikant. Die Lebendgeburtenraten waren bei allen 3 Gruppen vergleichbar. Bei den Blastozystentransfer-Untergruppen waren die klinischen Schwangerschaftsraten und Lebendgeburtenraten signifikant höher in der DET-Untergruppe mit 2 Embyros guter Qualität verglichen mit der DET-Untergruppe mit Embryos gemischer Qualität und den SET-Untergruppen. Die Mehrlingsschwangerschaftsraten waren in beiden DET-Gruppen höher (p = 0,001).

Schlussfolgerung DET mit Embryos von gemischter Qualität geht einher mit niedrigeren klinischen Schwangerschaftsraten und Lebendgeburtenraten als DET mit 2 Embryos von guter Qualität im Blastozystenstadium. Werden die Embryos im Teilungsstadium transferiert, gibt es hinsichtlich der Lebendgeburtenraten keinen Unterschied zwischen den 2 Gruppen.

Key words

double embryo transfer - embryo quality - cleavage stage - blastocyst stage - live birth rate - multiple pregnancy

Schlüsselwörter

Doppelembryonentransfer - Embryoqualität - Teilungsstadium - Blastozystenstadium - Lebendgeburtenrate - Mehrlingsschwangerschaft

Publication History

Received: 28 March 2020

Accepted after revision: 07 July 2020

Article published online:
14 August 2020

• References

• 1 Oron G, Son WY, Buckett W. et al. The association between embryo quality and perinatal outcome of singletons born after single embryo transfers: a pilot study. Hum Reprod 2014; 29: 1444-1451
• 2 Zhu J, Lian Y, Li M. et al. Does IVF cleavage stage embryo quality affect pregnancy complications and neonatal outcomes in singleton gestations after double embryo transfers?. J Assist Reprod Genet 2014; 31: 1635-1641
• 3 Teklenburg G, Salker M, Molokhia M. et al. Natural selection of human embryos: decidualizing endometrial stromal cells serve as sensors of embryo quality upon implantation. PloS one 2010; 5: e10258
• 4 Kushnir VA, Barad DH, Albertini DF. et al. Systematic review of worldwide trends in assisted reproductive technology 2004–2013. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2017; 15: 6
• 5 Prados N, Quiroga R, Caligara C. et al. Elective single versus double embryo transfer: live birth outcome and patient acceptance in a prospective randomised trial. Reprod Fertil Dev 2015; 27: 794-800
• 6 McLernon DJ, Harrild K, Bergh C. et al. Clinical effectiveness of elective single versus double embryo transfer: meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomised trials. BMJ 2010; 341: c6945
• 7 Wintner EM, Hershko-Klement A, Tzadikevitch K. et al. Does the transfer of a poor quality embryo together with a good quality embryo affect the In Vitro Fertilization (IVF) outcome?. J Ovarian Res 2017; 10: 2
• 8 Baczkowski T, Kurzawa R, Glabowski W. Methods of embryo scoring in in vitro fertilization. Reprod Biol 2004; 4: 5-22
• 9 Gardner DK, Lane M, Stevens J. et al. Blastocyst score affects implantation and pregnancy outcome: towards a single blastocyst transfer. Fertil Steril 2000; 73: 1155-1158
• 10 Dobson SJA, Lao MT, Michael E. et al. Effect of transfer of a poor quality embryo along with a top quality embryo on the outcome during fresh and frozen in vitro fertilization cycles. Fertil Steril 2018; 110: 655-660
• 11 Van Royen E, Mangelschots K, De Neubourg D. et al. Characterization of a top quality embryo, a step towards single-embryo transfer. Hum Reprod 1999; 14: 2345-2349
• 12 Pandian Z, Marjoribanks J, Ozturk O. et al. Number of embryos for transfer following in vitro fertilisation or intra-cytoplasmic sperm injection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; (07) CD003416
• 13 Paria BC, Dey SK. Preimplantation embryo development in vitro: cooperative interactions among embryos and role of growth factors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1990; 87: 4756-4760
• 14 Stokes PJ, Abeydeera LR, Leese HJ. Development of porcine embryos in vivo and in vitro; evidence for embryo ‘cross talk’ in vitro. Dev Biol 2005; 284: 62-71
• 15 Spyropoulou I, Karamalegos C, Bolton VN. A prospective randomized study comparing the outcome of in-vitro fertilization and embryo transfer following culture of human embryos individually or in groups before embryo transfer on day 2. Hum Reprod 1999; 14: 76-79
• 16 Tao T, Robichaud A, Mercier J. et al. Influence of group embryo culture strategies on the blastocyst development and pregnancy outcome. J Assist Reprod Genet 2013; 30: 63-68
• 17 Macklon NS, Brosens JJ. The human endometrium as a sensor of embryo quality. Biol Reprod 2014; 91: 98
• 18 El-Danasouri I, Sterzik K, Rinaldi L. et al. Effect of transferring a morphologically impaired embryo with a good quality embryo on the pregnancy and implantation rates. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 2016; 20: 394-398
• 19 Li J, Du M, Zhang Z. Does a poor-quality embryo have an adverse impact on a good-quality embryo when transferred together?. J Ovarian Res 2018; 11: 78
• 20 Staessen C, Platteau P, Van Assche E. et al. Comparison of blastocyst transfer with or without preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy screening in couples with advanced maternal age: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Hum Reprod 2004; 19: 2849-2858
• 21 Neuber E, Mahutte NG, Arici A. et al. Sequential embryo assessment outperforms investigator-driven morphological assessment at selecting a good quality blastocyst. Fertil Steril 2006; 85: 794-796
• 22 Milki AA, Hinckley MD, Gebhardt J. et al. Accuracy of day 3 criteria for selecting the best embryos. Fertil Steril 2002; 77: 1191-1195
• 23 Klenov VE, Boulet SL, Mejia RB. et al. Live birth and multiple birth rates in US in vitro fertilization treatment using donor oocytes: a comparison of single-embryo transfer and double-embryo transfer. J Assist Reprod Genet 2018; 35: 1657-1664
• 24 Chai J, Yeung TW, Lee VC. et al. Live birth rate, multiple pregnancy rate, and obstetric outcomes of elective single and double embryo transfers: Hong Kong experience. Hong Kong Med J 2014; 20: 102-106
• 25 Gelbaya TA, Tsoumpou I, Nardo LG. The likelihood of live birth and multiple birth after single versus double embryo transfer at the cleavage stage: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril 2010; 94: 936-945