Open Access
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Endosc Int Open 2020; 08(09): E1173-E1182
DOI: 10.1055/a-1198-4357
Review

Efficacy and safety of gastric exposed endoscopic full-thickness resection without laparoscopic assistance: a systematic review

Antonino Granata
1   Digestive Endoscopy Service, Department of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Services, IRCCS – ISMETT Palermo, Italy
,
Alberto Martino
1   Digestive Endoscopy Service, Department of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Services, IRCCS – ISMETT Palermo, Italy
,
Michele Amata
1   Digestive Endoscopy Service, Department of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Services, IRCCS – ISMETT Palermo, Italy
,
Dario Ligresti
1   Digestive Endoscopy Service, Department of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Services, IRCCS – ISMETT Palermo, Italy
,
Fabio Tuzzolino
2   Information Technology, IRCCS – ISMETT Palermo, Italy
,
Mario Traina
1   Digestive Endoscopy Service, Department of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Services, IRCCS – ISMETT Palermo, Italy
› Author Affiliations
Preview

Abstract

Background and study aims Exposed endoscopic full-thickness resection (Eo-EFTR) without laparoscopic assistance is a minimally invasive natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) technique that has shown promising efficacy and safety in resection of gastric submucosal tumors (G-SMTs) arising from muscularis propria (MP). However, data on the efficacy and safety of gastric Eo-EFTR mostly come from relatively small retrospective studies and concern regarding its use still exists. The aim of our systematic review was to assess the efficacy and safety of gastric Eo-EFTR without laparoscopic assistance.

Methods A detailed MEDLINE and EMBASE search was performed for papers published from January 1998 to November 2019 and reporting on gastric Eo-EFTR without laparoscopic assistance. The search strategy used the terms “endoscopic full thickness resection” and “gastric” or “stomach”. The primary outcomes were complete resection and surgical conversion rates. The secondary outcomes were overall major adverse events, delayed bleeding, delayed perforation, peritonitis, abdominal abscess and/or abdominal infection and successful Eo-EFTR.

Results Fifteen Asian studies were included in our final review, providing data on 750 Eo-EFTR-treated G-SMTs. The per-lesion rate of complete resection and surgical conversion were 98.8 %\0.8 %, respectively. The per-lesion rate of major adverse events, delayed bleeding, delayed perforation and peritonitis, abdominal abscess and/or abdominal infection was 1.6 %\0.5 %\0.1 %\0.9 %, respectively. The per-lesion rate of successful Eo-EFTR (i. e. complete tumor resection and effective endoscopic defect closure) was 98.3 %.

Conclusions Eo-EFTR without laparoscopic assistance appears to be highly effective and safe NOTES for removing deep G-SMTs, particularly those arising from MP layer.



Publication History

Received: 05 February 2020

Accepted: 25 May 2020

Article published online:
31 August 2020

© 2020. Owner and Copyright ©

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany