Preliminary assessment of two novel mechanical colonoscopic polypectomy simulators: Description, evaluation and validation

Abstract

Background and study aims Colonoscopic polypectomy is an essential endoscopic skill. The simulators available for training are limited and based on raw porcine colons. Animal intestines are inconvenient and offer limited advantages for polypectomy training. These limitations are avoided by two novel mechanical simulators — the magnetic system based simulator (MSPS) and the simulator for polypectomy with high frequency current (HFPS) — described here. They are equipped to demonstrate self-repair of polyps after making a cut and hybrid polyps. The aim of this study was to describe and establish face, content, and construct validity of the two simulators and to assess their perceived utility as training and assessment tools.

Methods Ten novice, seven intermediate, and 10 advanced endoscopists participated in this study. Each one performed two polypectomies in MSPS and then one polypectomy and polyp retrieval in HFPS. The median times were compared among the three groups to preliminarily assess construct validity as a primary outcome. To establish face validity, the novices and intermediates completed a questionnaire about the credibility of each simulator after finishing the tasks. For content validity, the experts completed a questionnaire grading different aspects of the simulators’ realism and their usefulness for training.

Results All 27 participants completed the modules. Median times needed to complete the tasks in both simulators differed significantly between the participants with different levels of experience (P < 0.05). Both MSPS and HFPS received favorable scores regarding face and content validity. No technical problems were encountered.

Conclusion This study provides preliminary validation for MSPS and HFPS as useful training tools in a preclinical setting as well as during colonoscopy training. Moreover, we demonstrated the construct validity of both simulators, which confirms their use as a skill assessment tool during a colonoscopy training program.

Publication History

Received: 23 July 2019

Accepted: 02 March 2020

Article published online:
07 October 2020

• References

• 1 Citarda F, Tomaselli G, Capocaccia R. et al. Efficacy in standard clinical practice of colonoscopic polypectomy in reducing colorectal cancer incidence. Gut 2001; 48: 812-815
• 2 Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Ho MN. et al. Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. The National Polyp Study Workgroup. N Engl J Med 1993; 329: 1977-1981
• 3 Chukmaitov A, Bradley CJ, Dahman B. et al. Association of polypectomy techniques, endoscopist volume, and facility type with colonoscopy complications. Gastrointest Endosc 2013; 77: 436-446
• 4 Boo SJ, Jung JH, Park JH. et al. An adequate level of training for technically competent colonoscopic polypectomy. Scand J Gastroenterol 2015; 50: 908-915
• 5 van Doorn SC, Bastiaansen BA, Thomas-Gibson S. et al. Polypectomy skills of gastroenterology fellows: can we improve them?. Endosc Int Open 2016; 4: E182-E189
• 6 Ansell J, Arnaoutakis K, Goddard S. et al. The WIMAT colonoscopy suitcase model: a novel porcine polypectomy trainer. Colorectal Dis 2013; 15: 217-223 ; discussion 223
• 7 Ansell J, Hurley JJ, Horwood J. et al. The Welsh Institute for Minimal Access Therapy colonoscopy suitcase has construct and concurrent validity for colonoscopic polypectomy skills training: a prospective, cross-sectional study. Gastrointest Endosc 2014; 79: 490-497
• 8 Neumann M, Hochberger J, Felzmann T. et al. Part 1. The Erlanger endo-trainer. Endoscopy 2001; 33: 887-890
• 9 Maiss J, Matthes K, Naegel A. et al. Der coloEASIE-Simulator – Ein neues Trainingsmodell für die interventionelle Kolo- und Rektoskopie. Endo heute 2005; 18: 190-193
• 10 Jirapinyo P, Kumar N, Thompson CC. Validation of an endoscopic part-task training box as a skill assessment tool. Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 81: 967-973
• 11 Takao T, Masumura R, Sakauchi S. et al. New report preparation system for endoscopic procedures using speech recognition technology. Endosc Int Open 2018; 6: E676-E687
• 12 Frimberger E, Abdelhafez M, Schmid RM. et al. A novel mechanical simulator for cannulation and sphincterotomy after Billroth II or Roux-en-Y reconstruction. Endosc Int Open 2016; 4: E922-E926
• 13 Bar-Meir S. A new endoscopic simulator. Endoscopy 2000; 32: 898-900
• 14 Frimberger E, von Delius S, Rosch T. et al. A novel and practicable ERCP training system with simulated fluoroscopy. Endoscopy 2008; 40: 517-520
• 15 Cohen J, Bosworth BP, Chak A. et al. Preservation and Incorporation of Valuable Endoscopic Innovations (PIVI) on the use of endoscopy simulators for training and assessing skill. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 76: 471-475
• 16 Thompson CC, Jirapinyo P, Kumar N. et al. Development and initial validation of an endoscopic part-task training box. Endoscopy 2014; 46: 735-744
• 17 Spier BJ, Benson M, Pfau PR. et al. Colonoscopy training in gastroenterology fellowships: determining competence. Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 71: 319-324