Download PDF
Hamostaseologie 2020; 40(05): 671-678
DOI: 10.1055/a-1171-0499
Original Article

In Vitro Closure Times (PFA-100) Are Different Between Peritoneal Dialysis and Hemodialysis

Cenk Gokalp
1   Department of Nephrology, Ege University, İzmir, Turkey
,
Fatma Keklik Karadag
2   Department of Internal Medicine, Ege University, İzmir, Turkey
,
Matthias Christoph Braunisch
3   Department of Nephrology, KlinikumRechts der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
,
Christoph Schmaderer
3   Department of Nephrology, KlinikumRechts der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
,
Emrah Gunay
1   Department of Nephrology, Ege University, İzmir, Turkey
,
Hatice Demet Kiper
4   Department of Hematology, Ege University, İzmir, Turkey
,
Mahmut Tobu
4   Department of Hematology, Ege University, İzmir, Turkey
,
Celalettin Ustün
5   Department of Hematology, University of Minnesota, Minnesota, United States
,
Meltem Sezis Demirci
1   Department of Nephrology, Ege University, İzmir, Turkey
,
Mehmet Ozkahya
1   Department of Nephrology, Ege University, İzmir, Turkey
› Author Affiliations Funding None.
› Further Information
Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Introduction Platelet dysfunction is not uncommon in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Type of renal replacement therapy may have an effect on platelet functions, which has not been well investigated. We evaluated in vitro closure time (CT) differences between peritoneal dialysis (PD) and hemodialysis (HD) patients using platelet function analyzer (PFA-100)and observed a significant difference between these renal replacement therapies.

Methods Patients with ESRD undergoing PD (n = 24) or HD (n = 23) for more than 6 months were included. Blood samples for collagen/epinephrine (Col/EPI) and collagen/adenosine diphosphate (Col/ADP) measurements were obtained before HD at a mid-week session for HD patients and at an outpatient control time for PD patients.

Results Three of 24 (12.5%) PD patients and 16 of 23 (69.5%) HD patients had prolonged PFA-100 Col/EPI, p< 0.001. Likewise, 4.2% of PD patients and 87.0% of HD patients had prolonged PFA-100 Col/ADP, p< 0.001. Moreover, the median times of PFA-Col/EPI and PFA-100 Col/ADP were significantly lower in PD patients compared with those of HD patients (p< 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that the type of renal replacement was a risk factor for both elevated PFA-100 Col/ADP and PFA-100 Col/EPI after adjusted for platelets, hematocrit, and urea (p< 0.001).

Conclusions The type of renal replacement therapy may have an effect on in vitro CTs; therefore, studies including more patients with long-term follow-up are needed to investigate if the difference has any impact on clinical outcomes.

Zusammenfassung

Eine Thrombozytendysfunktion ist bei Dialysepatienten nicht selten. Unklar ist inwieweit das Dialyseverfahren einen Einfluss auf die Thrombozytenfunktion hat. Wir untersuchten die in vitro Verschlusszeit mittels PFA-100 bei n = 24 Patienten mit Peritonealdialyse (PD) und n = 23 Patienten mit Hämodialyse (HD). Blutproben zu Messung von Kollagen/Adrenalin (Col/EPI) und Kollagen/ADP (Col/ADP) wurden bei HD-Patienten vor einer in der Mitte der Woche stattfindenden Dialysesitzung und bei PD-Patienten zur ambulanten Visite abgenommen. 13% der PD- und 70% der HD-Patienten hatten eine verlängerte PFA-100 Col/EPI. Ebenso lag bei 4% der PD- und 87% der HD-Patienten eine verlängerte PFA-100 Col/ADP vor. Gleichermaßen waren die medianen Verschlusszeiten von PFA-100 Col/EPI und Col/ADP bei PD- im Vergleich zu HD-Patienten signifikant niedriger. Nach Adjustierung blieb das Dialyseverfahren ein Risikofaktor sowohl für eine erhöhte PFA-100 Col/EPI als auch für eine PFA-100 Col/ADP. Weitere Studien sind notwendig um zu evaluieren, ob dieser Unterschied einen langfristigen Einfluss auf das klinische Outcome hat.

Keywords

in vitro closure time - hemodialysis - peritoneal dialysis - thrombocyte function - primary hemostasis

Schlüsselwörter

in vitro Verschlusszeit - Hämodialyse - Peritonealdialyse - Thrombozytenfunktion - primäreHämostase

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.


Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.




Publication History

Received: 21 June 2019

Accepted: 05 May 2020

Article published online:
27 July 2020

© 2020. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 

  • References

  • 1 Kim JH, Baek CH, Min JY, Kim JS, Kim SB, Kim H. Desmopressin improves platelet function in uremic patients taking antiplatelet agents who require emergent invasive procedures. Ann Hematol 2015; 94 (09) 1457-1461
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Molino D, De Lucia D, Gaspare De Santo N. Coagulation disorders in uremia. SeminNephrol 2006; 26 (01) 46-51
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Francis J, Francis D, Larson L, Helms E, Garcia M. Can the platelet function analyzer (PFA)-100 test substitute for the template bleeding time in routine clinical practice?. Platelets 1999; 10 (2–3): 132-136
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Zupan IP, Sabovic M, Salobir B, Ponikvar JB, Cernelc P. Utility of in vitro closure time test for evaluating platelet-related primary hemostasis in dialysis patients. Am J Kidney Dis 2003; 42 (04) 746-751
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Mattix H, Singh AK. Is the bleeding time predictive of bleeding prior to a percutaneous renal biopsy?. CurrOpinNephrolHypertens 1999; 8 (06) 715-718
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Paniccia R, Priora R, Liotta AA, Abbate R. Platelet function tests: a comparative review. Vasc Health Risk Manag 2015; 11: 133-148
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Favaloro EJ. Clinical utility of closure times using the platelet function analyzer-100/200. Am J Hematol 2017; 92 (04) 398-404
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Escolar G, Díaz-Ricart M, Cases A. Uremic platelet dysfunction: past and present. CurrHematol Rep 2005; 4 (05) 359-367
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Rath CE, Mailliard JA, Schreiner GE. Bleeding tendency in uremia. N Engl J Med 1957; 257 (17) 808-811
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Kaw D, Malhotra D. Platelet dysfunction and end-stage renal disease. SeminDial 2006; 19 (04) 317-322
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Mekawy MA, Habashy DM, Abd El-Mohsen WA. Effect of hemodialysis on platelet function in end-stage renal disease Egyptian patients using in vitro closure time test (PFA-100 analyzer). Platelets 2015; 26 (05) 443-447
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Bazilinski N, Shaykh M, Dunea G. et al. Inhibition of platelet function by uremic middle molecules. Nephron 1985; 40 (04) 423-428
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Martín Mateo MC, Cuevas Lobato OL, Bustamante J. Purification and analysis of plasmatic components of middle molecular weight in patients with uremic syndrome. Nephron 1995; 71 (02) 160-167
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Sloand JA, Sloand EM. Studies on platelet membrane glycoproteins and platelet function during hemodialysis. J Am Soc Nephrol 1997; 8 (05) 799-803
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Remuzzi G, Livio M, Marchiaro G, Mecca G, de Gaetano G. Bleeding in renal failure: altered platelet function in chronic uraemia only partially corrected by haemodialysis. Nephron 1978; 22 (4–6): 347-353
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Bilgin AU, Karadogan I, Artac M, Kizilors A, Bligin R, Undar L. Hemodialysis shortens long in vitro closure times as measured by the PFA-100. Med Sci Monit 2007; 13 (03) CR141-CR145
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Lindsay RM, Friesen M, Koens F, Linton AL, Oreopoulos D, de Veber G. Platelet function in patients on long term peritoneal dialysis. Clin Nephrol 1976; 6 (02) 335-339
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Salvati F, Liani M. Role of platelet surface receptor abnormalities in the bleeding and thrombotic diathesis of uremic patients on hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis. Int J Artif Organs 2001; 24 (03) 131-135
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Stępniewska J, Dołęgowska B, Chruściana M. et al. Platelet - derived CD154 antigen in patients with chronic kidney disease. Clin Biochem 2016; 49 (03) 243-247
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Knehtl M, Ponikvar R, Buturovic-Ponikvar J. Platelet-related Hemostasis Before and After Hemodialysis With Five Different Anticoagulation Methods. Int J Artif Organs. 2013;36(10):717–24. doi: 10.5301/ijao.5000239. Epub 2013 Sep 26
  • 21 Gäckler A, Rohn H, Lisman T, Benkö T, Witzke O, Kribben A, Saner FH. Evaluation of Hemostasis in Patients With End-Stage Renal Disease. PLoS One. 2019 Feb 20;14(02):e0212237. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0212237. eCollection 2019