PDF herunterladen
Int J Sports Med 2021; 42(02): 138-146
DOI: 10.1055/a-1157-9220
Training – Testing

Comparison of Omegawave Device and an Ambulatory ECG for RR Interval Measurement at rest

José Naranjo-Orellana 
1   Department of Sports and Computing, Pablo de Olavide University, Sevilla, Spain
,
José Francisco Ruso-Álvarez
1   Department of Sports and Computing, Pablo de Olavide University, Sevilla, Spain
,
José Luis Rojo-Álvarez
2   Department of Signal Theory and Communications and Telematic Systems and Computation, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Madrid, Spain
› Institutsangaben
› Weitere Informationen
Auch verfügbar auf
    Lizenzen und Reprints

Erratum zu diesem Artikel:

Correction: Comparison of Omegawave Device and an Ambulatory ECG for RR Interval Measurement at restInt J Sports Med 2020; 41(14): e19-e19
DOI: 10.1055/a-1294-4928

Abstract

The aim of this study was to validate the measurements of the beat intervals taken at rest by the Omegawave® device by comparing them to an ambulatory electrocardiogram system. For this purpose, the electrocardiogram was digitally processed, time-aligned, and scrutinized for its suitable use as gold-standard. Rest measurements were made for 10 minutes on 5 different days to 10 men and 3 women (24.8±5.05 years; 71.82±11.02 kg; 174.35±9.13 cm). RR intervals were simultaneously recorded using the Omegawave device and a Holter electrocardiogram. The processing of Holter electrocardiogram signals included the detrending of baseline noise and a high-pass filtering for emphasizing the QRS complexes and attenuating the T waves. After obtaining the RR intervals from the electrocardiogram, those from the Omegawave device were automatically aligned to them with cross-correlation digital processing techniques and compared to check whether both measurements could be considered superimposable. A Bland-Altman analysis was applied to the 5 measurements made for all subjects. The Omegawave device exhibited very strong agreement with a quality-controlled Holter electrocardiogram. Deviations not exceeding 25 ms could be expected in 95% of the cases, which is within manageable ranges both for clinical practice and for sports.

Key words

heart rate variability - sport device - validation


Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 23. Oktober 2019

Angenommen: 01. April 2020

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
25. August 2020

© 2020. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 

  • References

  • 1 Task Force of The European Society of Cardiology and The North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology Heart rate variability. Standards of measurement, physiological interpretation, and clinical use. Eur Heart J 1996; 17: 354-381 DOI: 10.1161/01.CIR.93.5.1043.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Tulppo MP, Mäkikallio TH, Seppänen T. et al. Vagal modulation of heart rate during exercise: effects of age and physical fitness. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 1998; 274: H424-H429
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Mourot L, Bouhaddi M, Perrey S. et al. Decrease in heart rate variability with overtraining: Assessment by the Poincaré plot analysis. Clin Physiol Func Imaging 2004; 24: 10-18
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Le Meur Y, Pichon A, Schaal K. et al. Evidence of parasympathetic hyperactivity in functionally overreached athletes. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2013; 45: 2061-2071
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Schmitt L, Regnard J, Desmarets M. et al. Fatigue shifts and scatters heart rate variability in elite endurance athletes. PLoS One 2013; 8: e71588
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Kiviniemi AM, Hautala AJ, Kinnunen H. et al. Daily exercise prescription on the basis of hr variability among men and women. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2010; 42: 1355-1363
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Plews DJ, Laursen PB, Stanley J. et al. Training adaptation and heart rate variability in elite endurance athletes: Opening the door to effective monitoring. Sports Med 2013; 43: 773-781
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Board EM, Ispoglou T, Ingle L. Validity of telemetric-derived measures of heart rate variability: A systematic review. J Exerc Physiol Online 2016; 19: 64-84
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Heishman AD, Curtis MA, Saliba EN. et al. Comparing performance during morning vs. afternoon training sessions in intercollegiate basketball players. J Strength Cond Res 2017; 31: 1557-1562
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Parrado E, García MÁ, Ramos J. et al. Comparison of omega wave system and polar S810i to detect R-R intervals at rest. Int J Sports Med 2010; 31: 336-341
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Dobbs WC, Fedewa MV, MacDonald HV. et al. The accuracy of acquiring heart rate variability from portable devices: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Med 2019; 49: 417-435
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Harriss DJ, Macsween A, Atkinson G. Ethical standards in sport and exercise science research: 2020 update. Int J Sports Med 2019; 40: 813-817
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Penttilä J, Helminen A, Jartti T. et al. Time domain, geometrical and frequency domain analysis of cardiac vagal outflow: effects of various respiratory patterns. Clin Physiol 2001; 21: 365-376
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Altman DG, Bland JM. Measurement in medicine: The analysis of method comparison studies. The Statistician 1983; 32: 307-317
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; 327: 307-310
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Medina Corrales M, De la Cruz torres B, Garrido Esquivel A. et al. Normal values of heart rate variability at rest in a young, healthy and active Mexican population. Health 2012; 4: 377-385
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Vanderlei LCM, Silva RA, Pastre CM. et al. Comparison of the Polar S810i monitor and the ECG for the analysis of heart rate variability in the time and frequency domains. Braz J Med Biol Res 2008; 41: 854-859
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Flatt AA, Esco MR. Validity of the ithletetm smart phone application for determining ultra-short-term heart rate variability. J Hum Kinet 2013; 39: 85-92
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 de Rezende Barbosa MP, da Silva NT, de Azevedo FM. et al. Comparison of Polar® RS800G3TM heart rate monitor with Polar® S810iTM and electrocardiogram to obtain the series of RR intervals and analysis of heart rate variability at rest. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging 2016; 36: 112-117
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Perrotta AS, Jeklin AT, Hives BA. et al. Validity of the Elite HRV smartphone application for examining heart rate variability in a field-based setting. J Strength Cond Res 2017; 31: 2296-2302
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Nunan D, Gay D, Jakovljevic DG. et al. Validity and reliability of short-term heart-rate variability from the Polar S810. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2009; 41: 243-250
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Plews DJ, Scott B, Altini M. et al. Comparison of heart-rate-variability recording with smartphone photoplethysmography, Polar H7 chest strap, and electrocardiography. Int J Sports Physiol Perform 2017; 12: 1324-1328
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Kingsley M, Lewis MJ, Marson RE. Comparison of Polar 810s and an ambulatory ECG system for RR interval measurement during progressive exercise. Int J Sports Med 2005; 26: 39-44
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Gamelin FX, Berthoin S, Bosquet L. Validity of the Polar S810 heart rate monitor to measure R–R intervals at rest. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2006; 38: 887-893
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Gamelin FX, Baquet G, Berthoin S. et al. Validity of the Polar S810 to measure R-R intervals in children. Int J Sports Med 2008; 29: 134-138
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Nunan D, Jakovljevic DG, Donovan G. et al. Levels of agreement for RR intervals and short-term heart rate variability obtained from the Polar S810 and an alternative system. Eur J Appl Physiol 2008; 103: 529-537
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Giles D, Draper N, Neil W. Validity of the Polar V800 heart rate monitor to measure RR intervals at rest. Eur J Appl Physiol 2015; 116: 563-571
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar