CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Endosc Int Open 2020; 08(05): E668-E672
DOI: 10.1055/a-1134-4786
Case report

Rendezvous transgastric and percutaneous sinus tract endoscopy (STE) for debridement of necrotic collections with deep retroperitoneal extension: a case series (with video)

Meeting presentations: Digestive Disease Week 2018
Guru Trikudanathan
Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
,
Hiba Hashmi
Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
,
Ahmed Dirweesh
Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
,
Stuart Amateau
Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
,
Nabeel Azeem
Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
,
Shawn Mallery
Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
,
Martin L. Freeman
Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Background and study aims Infected necrotic collections extending deep into the retroperitoneum may not be amenable solely to endoscopic necrosectomy. Rendezvous transgastric and percutaneous sinus tract endoscopic necrosectomy was conceived to maximize debridement and obviate the need for open necrosectomy or video-assisted retroperitoneal debridement.

Patients and methods Patients who underwent simultaneous rendezvous transgastric and sinus tract endoscopic transluminal necrosectomy at the same session were identified from a prospectively maintained database. Demographic data, clinical outcomes, immediate and late complications were evaluated.

Results Among 415 patients with necrotizing pancreatitis, four patients (three males, median age 47 years) underwent this intervention after a median 29.5 days following placement of percutaneous drain. Intra-procedural bleeding following dilation of percutaneous tract required placement of esophageal stent for tamponade. No patients required rescue open necrosectomy or video assisted retroperitoneal debridement. Complete removal of percutaneous drains was accomplished in all patients after a median of 78.5 days.

Conclusions Our novel approach is safe and effective and can expand the available armamentarium for management of large necrotic collection with deep retroperitoneal extension.



Publication History

Received: 28 May 2019

Accepted: 06 January 2019

Article published online:
17 April 2020

© 2020. Owner and Copyright ©

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Stuttgart · New York

 
  • References

  • 1 Banks PA, Bollen TL, Dervenis C. et al. Classification of acute pancreatitis--2012: revision of the Atlanta classification and definitions by international consensus. Gut 2013; 62: 102-111
  • 2 Trikudanathan G, Attam R, Arain MA. et al. Endoscopic interventions for necrotizing pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol 2014; 109: 969-981; quiz 982
  • 3 Jürgensen C, Brückner S, Reichel S. et al. Flexible percutaneous endoscopic retroperitoneal necrosectomy as rescue therapy for pancreatic necroses beyond the reach of endoscopic ultrasonography: A case series. Dig Endosc 2017; 29: 377-382
  • 4 Carter CR, McKay CJ, Imrie CW. Percutaneous necrosectomy and sinus tract endoscopy in the management of infected pancreatic necrosis: an initial experience. Ann Surg 2000; 232: 175-180
  • 5 Arvanitakis M, Dumonceau J-M, Albert J. et al. Endoscopic management of acute necrotizing pancreatitis: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) evidence-based multidisciplinary guidelines. Endoscopy 2018; 50: 524-546
  • 6 van Brunschot S, van Grinsven J, van Santvoort HC. et al. Endoscopic or surgical step-up approach for infected necrotising pancreatitis: a multicentre randomised trial. Lancet 2018; 391: 51-58
  • 7 Bakker OJ, van Santvoort HC, van Brunschot S. et al. Endoscopic transgastric vs surgical necrosectomy for infected necrotizing pancreatitis: a randomized trial. JAMA 2012; 307: 1053-1061
  • 8 Bang JY, Arnoletti JP, Holt BA. et al. An endoscopic transluminal approach, compared to minimally invasive surgery, reduces complications and costs for patients with necrotizing pancreatitis. Gastroenterology 2018; 56: 1027-1040
  • 9 Trikudanathan G, Arain M, Attam R. et al. Interventions for necrotizing pancreatitis: an overview of current approaches. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2013; 7: 463-475
  • 10 Freeman ML, Werner J, van Santvoort HC. et al. Interventions for necrotizing pancreatitis: summary of a multidisciplinary consensus conference. Pancreas 2012; 41: 1176-1194
  • 11 Ross AS, Irani S, Gan SI. et al. Dual-modality drainage of infected and symptomatic walled-off pancreatic necrosis: long-term clinical outcomes. Gastrointest Endosc 2014; 79: 929-935
  • 12 Horvath KD, Kao LS, Wherry KL. et al. A technique for laparoscopic-assisted percutaneous drainage of infected pancreatic necrosis and pancreatic abscess. Surg Endosc 2001; 15: 1221-1225
  • 13 Gambiez LP, Denimal FA, Porte HL. et al. Retroperitoneal approach and endoscopic management of peripancreatic necrosis collections. Arch Surg Chic Ill 1998; 133: 66-72
  • 14 Dhingra R, Srivastava S, Behra S. et al. Single or multiport percutaneous endoscopic necrosectomy performed with the patient under conscious sedation is a safe and effective treatment for infected pancreatic necrosis (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 81: 351-359
  • 15 Saumoy M, Kumta NA, Tyberg A. et al. Transcutaneous Endoscopic necrosectomy for walled-off pancreatic necrosis in the paracolic gutter. J Clin Gastroenterol 2018; 52: 458-463